From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Fix macro definition spelling
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 20:57:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190614035736.GA57346@archlinux-epyc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190514185404.GP4319@dell>
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 07:54:04PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2019, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 08:30:59AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, 10 May 2019, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > >
> > > > Clang warns:
> > > >
> > > > In file included from drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:13:
> > > > include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h:7:9: warning: 'MFD_STMFX_H' is used as a
> > > > header guard here, followed by #define of a different macro
> > > > [-Wheader-guard]
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 06252ade9156 ("mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver")
> > > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/475
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > Applied, thanks.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Lee,
> >
> > Thanks for picking it up. It seems this didn't make it into your MFD
> > pull request for 5.2, was that intentional? It would be nice to avoid
> > this warning.
>
> Hmm... no it was not intentional. Not sure what happened there.
>
> I will pick it up for the -rcs.
Hi Lee,
Have you picked this up yet? I don't see it in -next or your public
tree.
Cheers,
Nathan
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Fix macro definition spelling
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 20:57:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190614035736.GA57346@archlinux-epyc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190514185404.GP4319@dell>
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 07:54:04PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2019, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 08:30:59AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, 10 May 2019, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > >
> > > > Clang warns:
> > > >
> > > > In file included from drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:13:
> > > > include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h:7:9: warning: 'MFD_STMFX_H' is used as a
> > > > header guard here, followed by #define of a different macro
> > > > [-Wheader-guard]
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 06252ade9156 ("mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver")
> > > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/475
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > Applied, thanks.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Lee,
> >
> > Thanks for picking it up. It seems this didn't make it into your MFD
> > pull request for 5.2, was that intentional? It would be nice to avoid
> > this warning.
>
> Hmm... no it was not intentional. Not sure what happened there.
>
> I will pick it up for the -rcs.
Hi Lee,
Have you picked this up yet? I don't see it in -next or your public
tree.
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-14 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-11 1:23 [PATCH] mfd: stmfx: Fix macro definition spelling Nathan Chancellor
2019-05-11 1:23 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-05-13 7:10 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-05-13 7:10 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-05-13 7:30 ` Lee Jones
2019-05-13 7:30 ` Lee Jones
2019-05-14 18:39 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-05-14 18:39 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-05-14 18:54 ` Lee Jones
2019-05-14 18:54 ` Lee Jones
2019-05-14 19:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-05-14 19:45 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-06-14 3:57 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2019-06-14 3:57 ` Nathan Chancellor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190614035736.GA57346@archlinux-epyc \
--to=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=amelie.delaunay@st.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.