From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 20:18:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201906251312.5059C51334@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c0d4ed622d6b8e47e040d398f764d52a9ac396d.camel@perches.com>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:49:01AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 10:31 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:52:23AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 11:01 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> > > > cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> > > []
> > > > This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> > > > -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
> > >
> > > Just enable the thing already.
> >
> > Linus has been pretty clear about not wanting warning options enabled
> > without first fixing all the cases it warns about first.
>
> Hey Kees.
>
> I don't recall that particular tidbit. Got a link?
It was spread out over the discussion around removing __deprecated,
about enabling -Wvla, and in person at the kernel summit when asking
what approach to take for -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
--
Kees Cook
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:18:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201906251312.5059C51334@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c0d4ed622d6b8e47e040d398f764d52a9ac396d.camel@perches.com>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:49:01AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 10:31 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:52:23AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 11:01 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> > > > cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> > > []
> > > > This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> > > > -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
> > >
> > > Just enable the thing already.
> >
> > Linus has been pretty clear about not wanting warning options enabled
> > without first fixing all the cases it warns about first.
>
> Hey Kees.
>
> I don't recall that particular tidbit. Got a link?
It was spread out over the discussion around removing __deprecated,
about enabling -Wvla, and in person at the kernel summit when asking
what approach to take for -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
--
Kees Cook
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 13:18:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201906251312.5059C51334@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c0d4ed622d6b8e47e040d398f764d52a9ac396d.camel@perches.com>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:49:01AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 10:31 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:52:23AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 11:01 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > > > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> > > > cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> > > []
> > > > This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> > > > -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
> > >
> > > Just enable the thing already.
> >
> > Linus has been pretty clear about not wanting warning options enabled
> > without first fixing all the cases it warns about first.
>
> Hey Kees.
>
> I don't recall that particular tidbit. Got a link?
It was spread out over the discussion around removing __deprecated,
about enabling -Wvla, and in person at the kernel summit when asking
what approach to take for -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
--
Kees Cook
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-25 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20190625160111epcas3p162f3d789c6219e679d9fd30c6a6b3d51@epcas3p1.samsung.com>
2019-06-25 16:01 ` [PATCH] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: Mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-06-25 16:01 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-06-25 16:52 ` Joe Perches
2019-06-25 16:52 ` Joe Perches
2019-06-25 16:52 ` Joe Perches
2019-06-25 17:06 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-06-25 17:06 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-06-25 17:06 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-06-25 17:37 ` Joe Perches
2019-06-25 17:37 ` Joe Perches
2019-06-25 17:31 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-25 17:31 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-25 17:49 ` Joe Perches
2019-06-25 17:49 ` Joe Perches
2019-06-25 20:18 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2019-06-25 20:18 ` Kees Cook
2019-06-25 20:18 ` Kees Cook
2019-07-05 15:16 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2019-07-05 15:16 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201906251312.5059C51334@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.