From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
Cc: "vigneshr@ti.com" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"bbrezillon@kernel.org" <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
"helmut.grohne@intenta.de" <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>,
"richard@nod.at" <richard@nod.at>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"marek.vasut@gmail.com" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
"yamada.masahiro@socionext.com" <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"miquel.raynal@bootlin.com" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"computersforpeace@gmail.com" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v17 1/2] mtd: rawnand: nand_micron: Do not over write driver's read_page()/write_page()
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:20:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626142021.484c4fd8@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR02MB4779B5C815FB4DAF33EF4996AFE20@DM6PR02MB4779.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 12:12:47 +0000
Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:34 PM
> > To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
> > Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com; helmut.grohne@intenta.de; richard@nod.at;
> > dwmw2@infradead.org; computersforpeace@gmail.com; marek.vasut@gmail.com;
> > vigneshr@ti.com; bbrezillon@kernel.org; yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; linux-
> > mtd@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v17 1/2] mtd: rawnand: nand_micron: Do not over write
> > driver's read_page()/write_page()
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:51:12 +0000
> > Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Boris,
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 4:57 PM
> > > > To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
> > > > Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com; helmut.grohne@intenta.de;
> > > > richard@nod.at; dwmw2@infradead.org; computersforpeace@gmail.com;
> > > > marek.vasut@gmail.com; vigneshr@ti.com; bbrezillon@kernel.org;
> > > > yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; linux- mtd@lists.infradead.org;
> > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v17 1/2] mtd: rawnand: nand_micron: Do not
> > > > over write driver's read_page()/write_page()
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:22:33 +0000
> > > > Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Boris,
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 12:18 PM
> > > > > > To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
> > > > > > Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com; helmut.grohne@intenta.de;
> > > > > > richard@nod.at; dwmw2@infradead.org;
> > > > > > computersforpeace@gmail.com; marek.vasut@gmail.com;
> > > > > > vigneshr@ti.com; bbrezillon@kernel.org;
> > > > > > yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; linux- mtd@lists.infradead.org;
> > > > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v17 1/2] mtd: rawnand: nand_micron: Do
> > > > > > not over write driver's read_page()/write_page()
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:46:29 -0600 Naga Sureshkumar Relli
> > > > > > <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Add check before assigning chip->ecc.read_page() and
> > > > > > > chip->ecc.write_page()
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Naga Sureshkumar Relli
> > > > > > > <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c | 7 +++++--
> > > > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > > > > > > b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > > > > > > index cbd4f09ac178..565f2696c747 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > > > > > > @@ -500,8 +500,11 @@ static int micron_nand_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > > > > > > chip->ecc.size = 512;
> > > > > > > chip->ecc.strength = chip->base.eccreq.strength;
> > > > > > > chip->ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_BCH;
> > > > > > > - chip->ecc.read_page = micron_nand_read_page_on_die_ecc;
> > > > > > > - chip->ecc.write_page = micron_nand_write_page_on_die_ecc;
> > > > > > > + if (!chip->ecc.read_page)
> > > > > > > + chip->ecc.read_page = micron_nand_read_page_on_die_ecc;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + if (!chip->ecc.write_page)
> > > > > > > + chip->ecc.write_page = micron_nand_write_page_on_die_ecc;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's wrong, if you don't want on-die ECC to be used, simply
> > > > > > don't set nand-ecc-mode to "on- die".
> > > > > Ok. But if we want to use on-die ECC then you mean to say it is
> > > > > mandatory to use
> > > > micron_nand_read/write_page_on_die_ecc()?
> > > >
> > > > Absolutely, and if it doesn't work that means you driver does not
> > > > implement raw accesses correctly, which means it's still buggy...
> > > I agree. But let's say, if there is a limitation with the controller. Then it is must to have this
> > check right?
> > > I mean, for pl353 controller, we must clear the CS during the data
> > > phase, hence we are splitting the Transfer in the pl353_read/write_page_raw().
> > > + pl353_nand_read_data_op(chip, buf, mtd->writesize, false);
> > > + p = chip->oob_poi;
> > > + pl353_nand_read_data_op(chip, p,
> > > + (mtd->oobsize -
> > > + PL353_NAND_LAST_TRANSFER_LENGTH), false);
> > > + p += (mtd->oobsize - PL353_NAND_LAST_TRANSFER_LENGTH);
> > > + xnfc->dataphase_addrflags |= PL353_NAND_CLEAR_CS;
> > > + pl353_nand_read_data_op(chip, p, PL353_NAND_LAST_TRANSFER_LENGTH,
> > > + false);
> > > As the above sequence is needed even for raw access, PL353 is unable to use the on_die_page
> > reads.
> >
> > This "de-assert CS on last access" logic should be done in the
> > exec_op() implementation. I also wonder how that works for operations that don't have data
> > cycles. Oh, BTW, most chips are CE-don't-care, which means you can assert/de-assert CS on
> > each read_data_op() without any issues.
> Yes, we can assert/de-assert CS on each read/write_data_op().
> But what about transfer length splitting?
> + p = chip->oob_poi;
> + pl353_nand_read_data_op(chip, p,
> + (mtd->oobsize -
> + PL353_NAND_LAST_TRANSFER_LENGTH), false);
> + p += (mtd->oobsize - PL353_NAND_LAST_TRANSFER_LENGTH);
> This should be done as a part of pl353_raw_read/write() right?
Are you sure you need to do that, and if that's the case, do you have
an idea why this is needed? Is this "read last 4 bytes separately"
thing is needed, I suspect it's needed for any kind of input-data
cycles, not just page reads.
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
Cc: "miquel.raynal@bootlin.com" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"helmut.grohne@intenta.de" <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>,
"richard@nod.at" <richard@nod.at>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"computersforpeace@gmail.com" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
"marek.vasut@gmail.com" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
"vigneshr@ti.com" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"bbrezillon@kernel.org" <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
"yamada.masahiro@socionext.com" <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v17 1/2] mtd: rawnand: nand_micron: Do not over write driver's read_page()/write_page()
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:20:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190626142021.484c4fd8@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR02MB4779B5C815FB4DAF33EF4996AFE20@DM6PR02MB4779.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 12:12:47 +0000
Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:34 PM
> > To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
> > Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com; helmut.grohne@intenta.de; richard@nod.at;
> > dwmw2@infradead.org; computersforpeace@gmail.com; marek.vasut@gmail.com;
> > vigneshr@ti.com; bbrezillon@kernel.org; yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; linux-
> > mtd@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v17 1/2] mtd: rawnand: nand_micron: Do not over write
> > driver's read_page()/write_page()
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:51:12 +0000
> > Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Boris,
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 4:57 PM
> > > > To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
> > > > Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com; helmut.grohne@intenta.de;
> > > > richard@nod.at; dwmw2@infradead.org; computersforpeace@gmail.com;
> > > > marek.vasut@gmail.com; vigneshr@ti.com; bbrezillon@kernel.org;
> > > > yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; linux- mtd@lists.infradead.org;
> > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v17 1/2] mtd: rawnand: nand_micron: Do not
> > > > over write driver's read_page()/write_page()
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 11:22:33 +0000
> > > > Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Boris,
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 12:18 PM
> > > > > > To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
> > > > > > Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com; helmut.grohne@intenta.de;
> > > > > > richard@nod.at; dwmw2@infradead.org;
> > > > > > computersforpeace@gmail.com; marek.vasut@gmail.com;
> > > > > > vigneshr@ti.com; bbrezillon@kernel.org;
> > > > > > yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; linux- mtd@lists.infradead.org;
> > > > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v17 1/2] mtd: rawnand: nand_micron: Do
> > > > > > not over write driver's read_page()/write_page()
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:46:29 -0600 Naga Sureshkumar Relli
> > > > > > <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Add check before assigning chip->ecc.read_page() and
> > > > > > > chip->ecc.write_page()
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Naga Sureshkumar Relli
> > > > > > > <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c | 7 +++++--
> > > > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > > > > > > b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > > > > > > index cbd4f09ac178..565f2696c747 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> > > > > > > @@ -500,8 +500,11 @@ static int micron_nand_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > > > > > > chip->ecc.size = 512;
> > > > > > > chip->ecc.strength = chip->base.eccreq.strength;
> > > > > > > chip->ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_BCH;
> > > > > > > - chip->ecc.read_page = micron_nand_read_page_on_die_ecc;
> > > > > > > - chip->ecc.write_page = micron_nand_write_page_on_die_ecc;
> > > > > > > + if (!chip->ecc.read_page)
> > > > > > > + chip->ecc.read_page = micron_nand_read_page_on_die_ecc;
> > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > + if (!chip->ecc.write_page)
> > > > > > > + chip->ecc.write_page = micron_nand_write_page_on_die_ecc;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's wrong, if you don't want on-die ECC to be used, simply
> > > > > > don't set nand-ecc-mode to "on- die".
> > > > > Ok. But if we want to use on-die ECC then you mean to say it is
> > > > > mandatory to use
> > > > micron_nand_read/write_page_on_die_ecc()?
> > > >
> > > > Absolutely, and if it doesn't work that means you driver does not
> > > > implement raw accesses correctly, which means it's still buggy...
> > > I agree. But let's say, if there is a limitation with the controller. Then it is must to have this
> > check right?
> > > I mean, for pl353 controller, we must clear the CS during the data
> > > phase, hence we are splitting the Transfer in the pl353_read/write_page_raw().
> > > + pl353_nand_read_data_op(chip, buf, mtd->writesize, false);
> > > + p = chip->oob_poi;
> > > + pl353_nand_read_data_op(chip, p,
> > > + (mtd->oobsize -
> > > + PL353_NAND_LAST_TRANSFER_LENGTH), false);
> > > + p += (mtd->oobsize - PL353_NAND_LAST_TRANSFER_LENGTH);
> > > + xnfc->dataphase_addrflags |= PL353_NAND_CLEAR_CS;
> > > + pl353_nand_read_data_op(chip, p, PL353_NAND_LAST_TRANSFER_LENGTH,
> > > + false);
> > > As the above sequence is needed even for raw access, PL353 is unable to use the on_die_page
> > reads.
> >
> > This "de-assert CS on last access" logic should be done in the
> > exec_op() implementation. I also wonder how that works for operations that don't have data
> > cycles. Oh, BTW, most chips are CE-don't-care, which means you can assert/de-assert CS on
> > each read_data_op() without any issues.
> Yes, we can assert/de-assert CS on each read/write_data_op().
> But what about transfer length splitting?
> + p = chip->oob_poi;
> + pl353_nand_read_data_op(chip, p,
> + (mtd->oobsize -
> + PL353_NAND_LAST_TRANSFER_LENGTH), false);
> + p += (mtd->oobsize - PL353_NAND_LAST_TRANSFER_LENGTH);
> This should be done as a part of pl353_raw_read/write() right?
Are you sure you need to do that, and if that's the case, do you have
an idea why this is needed? Is this "read last 4 bytes separately"
thing is needed, I suspect it's needed for any kind of input-data
cycles, not just page reads.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-26 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-25 4:46 [LINUX PATCH v17 1/2] mtd: rawnand: nand_micron: Do not over write driver's read_page()/write_page() Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-06-25 4:46 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-06-25 4:46 ` [LINUX PATCH v17 2/2] mtd: rawnand: pl353: Add basic driver for arm pl353 smc nand interface Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-06-25 4:46 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-06-25 14:11 ` Helmut Grohne
2019-06-25 14:11 ` Helmut Grohne
2019-07-03 6:13 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-07-03 6:13 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-07-03 6:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-07-03 6:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-07-03 8:57 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-07-03 8:57 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-07-03 11:06 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-07-03 11:06 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-07-03 11:29 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-07-03 11:29 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-07-03 11:40 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-07-03 11:40 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-06-25 14:11 ` [LINUX PATCH v17 1/2] mtd: rawnand: nand_micron: Do not over write driver's read_page()/write_page() Helmut Grohne
2019-06-25 14:11 ` Helmut Grohne
2019-06-26 6:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-06-26 6:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-06-26 11:22 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-06-26 11:22 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-06-26 11:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-06-26 11:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-06-26 11:51 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-06-26 11:51 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-06-26 12:04 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-06-26 12:04 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-06-26 12:12 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-06-26 12:12 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-06-26 12:20 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2019-06-26 12:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-06-26 12:33 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-06-26 12:33 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-07-08 12:18 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2019-07-08 12:18 ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190626142021.484c4fd8@collabora.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=helmut.grohne@intenta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=nagasure@xilinx.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.