All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: slightly improve cache helpers
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 08:35:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190709133540.GJ30355@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5864549-40c3-badd-8c41-d5b7bf3c4f3c@c-s.fr>

On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 07:04:43AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 08/07/2019 à 21:14, Nathan Chancellor a écrit :
> >On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:19:30AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >>On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 09:24:48 UTC, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>>Cache instructions (dcbz, dcbi, dcbf and dcbst) take two registers
> >>>that are summed to obtain the target address. Using 'Z' constraint
> >>>and '%y0' argument gives GCC the opportunity to use both registers
> >>>instead of only one with the second being forced to 0.
> >>>
> >>>Suggested-by: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
> >>
> >>Applied to powerpc next, thanks.
> >>
> >>https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/6c5875843b87c3adea2beade9d1b8b3d4523900a
> >>
> >>cheers
> >
> >This patch causes a regression with clang:
> 
> Is that a Clang bug ?

I would think so, but cannot tell from the given information.

> Do you have a disassembly of the code both with and without this patch 
> in order to compare ?

That's what we need to start debugging this, yup.

> Segher, any idea ?

There is nothing I recognise, no.


Segher

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: slightly improve cache helpers
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 08:35:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190709133540.GJ30355@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5864549-40c3-badd-8c41-d5b7bf3c4f3c@c-s.fr>

On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 07:04:43AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 08/07/2019 à 21:14, Nathan Chancellor a écrit :
> >On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:19:30AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >>On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 09:24:48 UTC, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>>Cache instructions (dcbz, dcbi, dcbf and dcbst) take two registers
> >>>that are summed to obtain the target address. Using 'Z' constraint
> >>>and '%y0' argument gives GCC the opportunity to use both registers
> >>>instead of only one with the second being forced to 0.
> >>>
> >>>Suggested-by: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
> >>
> >>Applied to powerpc next, thanks.
> >>
> >>https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/6c5875843b87c3adea2beade9d1b8b3d4523900a
> >>
> >>cheers
> >
> >This patch causes a regression with clang:
> 
> Is that a Clang bug ?

I would think so, but cannot tell from the given information.

> Do you have a disassembly of the code both with and without this patch 
> in order to compare ?

That's what we need to start debugging this, yup.

> Segher, any idea ?

There is nothing I recognise, no.


Segher

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-09 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-10  9:24 [PATCH v2] powerpc: slightly improve cache helpers Christophe Leroy
2019-05-10  9:24 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-07-08  1:19 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-08 19:14   ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-08 19:14     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-09  5:04     ` Christophe Leroy
2019-07-09  5:04       ` Christophe Leroy
2019-07-09  6:49       ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-09  6:49         ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-19  3:24         ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-19  3:24           ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-19 15:23           ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-19 15:23             ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-19 16:04             ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-19 16:04               ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-21  7:58               ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-21  7:58                 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-21 18:01                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-21 18:01                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-22  2:41                   ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-22  2:41                     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-07-22  6:19                     ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-22  6:19                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-22 17:21                       ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-22 17:21                         ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-22 17:58                         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-22 17:58                           ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-25 21:30                           ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-25 21:30                             ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-29 20:28                             ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-29 20:28                               ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-07-22 10:15                   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-22 10:15                     ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-22 15:18                     ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-22 15:18                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-22 23:21                       ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-22 23:21                         ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-25 13:22                         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-25 13:22                           ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-07-22  0:53                 ` [PATCH] powerpc: Test broken dcbz kbuild test robot
2019-07-22  0:53                   ` kbuild test robot
2019-07-09 13:35       ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2019-07-09 13:35         ` [PATCH v2] powerpc: slightly improve cache helpers Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190709133540.GJ30355@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.