From: helgaas@kernel.org (Bjorn Helgaas)
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: PCIe: ASPM: Introduce pcie_aspm_enabled_mask()
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:15:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190808131536.GE151852@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3714448.mG7dE8Q3Fs@kreacher>
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019@12:06:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com>
>
> Add a function returning the mask of currently enabled ASPM link
> states for a given device.
>
> It will be used by the NVMe driver to decide how to handle the
> device during system suspend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com>
> ---
>
> -> v2:
> * Move the PCI/PCIe ASPM changes to a separate patch.
> * Add the _mask suffix to the new function name.
> * Add EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() to the new function.
> * Avoid adding an unnecessary blank line.
>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -1170,6 +1170,26 @@ static int pcie_aspm_get_policy(char *bu
> module_param_call(policy, pcie_aspm_set_policy, pcie_aspm_get_policy,
> NULL, 0644);
>
> +/*
> + * pcie_aspm_enabled_mask - Return the mask of enabled ASPM link states.
> + * @pci_device: Target device.
> + */
> +u32 pcie_aspm_enabled_mask(struct pci_dev *pci_device)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(pci_device);
> + u32 ret;
> +
> + if (!bridge)
> + return 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&aspm_lock);
> + ret = bridge->link_state ? bridge->link_state->aspm_enabled : 0;
This returns the "aspm_enabled" mask, but the values of that mask are
combinations of:
ASPM_STATE_L0S_UP
ASPM_STATE_L0S_DW
ASPM_STATE_L1
...
which are defined internally in drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c and not
visible to the caller of pcie_aspm_enabled_mask(). If there's no need
for the actual mask (the current caller doesn't seem to use it), maybe
this could be a boolean?
> + mutex_unlock(&aspm_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pcie_aspm_enabled_mask);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM_DEBUG
> static ssize_t link_state_show(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/pci.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1567,8 +1567,11 @@ extern bool pcie_ports_native;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
> bool pcie_aspm_support_enabled(void);
> +u32 pcie_aspm_enabled_mask(struct pci_dev *pci_device);
> #else
> static inline bool pcie_aspm_support_enabled(void) { return false; }
> +static inline u32 pcie_aspm_enabled_mask(struct pci_dev *pci_device)
> +{ return 0; }
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: linux-nvme <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>,
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: PCIe: ASPM: Introduce pcie_aspm_enabled_mask()
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 08:15:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190808131536.GE151852@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3714448.mG7dE8Q3Fs@kreacher>
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 12:06:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Add a function returning the mask of currently enabled ASPM link
> states for a given device.
>
> It will be used by the NVMe driver to decide how to handle the
> device during system suspend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>
> -> v2:
> * Move the PCI/PCIe ASPM changes to a separate patch.
> * Add the _mask suffix to the new function name.
> * Add EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() to the new function.
> * Avoid adding an unnecessary blank line.
>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -1170,6 +1170,26 @@ static int pcie_aspm_get_policy(char *bu
> module_param_call(policy, pcie_aspm_set_policy, pcie_aspm_get_policy,
> NULL, 0644);
>
> +/*
> + * pcie_aspm_enabled_mask - Return the mask of enabled ASPM link states.
> + * @pci_device: Target device.
> + */
> +u32 pcie_aspm_enabled_mask(struct pci_dev *pci_device)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *bridge = pci_upstream_bridge(pci_device);
> + u32 ret;
> +
> + if (!bridge)
> + return 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&aspm_lock);
> + ret = bridge->link_state ? bridge->link_state->aspm_enabled : 0;
This returns the "aspm_enabled" mask, but the values of that mask are
combinations of:
ASPM_STATE_L0S_UP
ASPM_STATE_L0S_DW
ASPM_STATE_L1
...
which are defined internally in drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c and not
visible to the caller of pcie_aspm_enabled_mask(). If there's no need
for the actual mask (the current caller doesn't seem to use it), maybe
this could be a boolean?
> + mutex_unlock(&aspm_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pcie_aspm_enabled_mask);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM_DEBUG
> static ssize_t link_state_show(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/pci.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1567,8 +1567,11 @@ extern bool pcie_ports_native;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
> bool pcie_aspm_support_enabled(void);
> +u32 pcie_aspm_enabled_mask(struct pci_dev *pci_device);
> #else
> static inline bool pcie_aspm_support_enabled(void) { return false; }
> +static inline u32 pcie_aspm_enabled_mask(struct pci_dev *pci_device)
> +{ return 0; }
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-08 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-25 9:51 [Regression] Commit "nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend" has problems Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 9:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 14:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-25 14:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-25 16:23 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-25 16:23 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-25 17:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 17:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 17:23 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-25 17:23 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-25 18:20 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-25 18:20 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-25 19:09 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-25 19:09 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-30 10:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-30 10:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-30 14:41 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-30 14:41 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-30 17:14 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-30 17:14 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-30 18:50 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-30 18:50 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-30 19:19 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-30 19:19 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-30 21:05 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-30 21:05 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-30 21:31 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-30 21:31 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-31 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-31 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-31 22:19 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-31 22:19 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-31 22:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-31 22:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01 9:05 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-01 9:05 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-01 17:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01 17:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01 19:05 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-01 19:05 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-01 22:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01 22:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02 10:55 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-02 10:55 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-02 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-05 19:13 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-05 19:13 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-05 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-05 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-06 14:02 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-06 14:02 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-06 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-06 15:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-01 20:22 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-01 20:22 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-07 9:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 9:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 10:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 9:53 ` [PATCH] nvme-pci: Do not prevent PCI bus-level PM from being used Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 9:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-07 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-07 14:37 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-07 14:37 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-08 8:36 ` [PATCH] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 8:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 8:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08 8:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-08 9:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 9:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: PCIe: ASPM: Introduce pcie_aspm_enabled_mask() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 13:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-08-08 13:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 14:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 14:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 10:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 13:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 13:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 14:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 14:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 17:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 17:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 18:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 18:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 20:01 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-08 20:01 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-08 20:05 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-08 20:05 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-08-08 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09 4:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-09 4:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-09 8:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09 8:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 21:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 21:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: PCIe: ASPM: Introduce pcie_aspm_enabled() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 21:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09 4:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-09 4:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-09 8:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09 8:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-07 22:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-07 22:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-08 9:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-08 9:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-08 21:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-08 21:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-08 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-08 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-09 12:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-10-09 12:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-08 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] nvme-pci: Allow PCI bus-level PM to be used if ASPM is disabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 21:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-08 22:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Keith Busch
2019-08-08 22:13 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-09 8:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09 8:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-09 14:52 ` Keith Busch
2019-08-09 14:52 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-25 16:59 ` [Regression] Commit "nvme/pci: Use host managed power state for suspend" has problems Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 16:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 14:52 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-25 14:52 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-25 19:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 19:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 19:52 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-25 19:52 ` Keith Busch
2019-07-25 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-25 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-26 14:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-26 14:02 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-07-27 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-27 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-29 15:51 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-29 15:51 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-07-29 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-29 22:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190808131536.GE151852@google.com \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.