All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"# 3.4.x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:45:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190828184529.GC127646@archlinux-threadripper> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdmXbYrR6n-cxKt3XxkE4Lmj0sSoZBUtHVb0V2LTUFHmug@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:01:14AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:53 AM Nathan Chancellor
> <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:43:53PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Commit aea447141c7e ("powerpc: Disable -Wbuiltin-requires-header when
> > > > setjmp is used") disabled -Wbuiltin-requires-header because of a warning
> > > > about the setjmp and longjmp declarations.
> > > >
> > > > r367387 in clang added another diagnostic around this, complaining that
> > > > there is no jmp_buf declaration.
> > > >
> > > > In file included from ../arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c:47:
> > > > ../arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h:10:13: error: declaration of
> > > > built-in function 'setjmp' requires the declaration of the 'jmp_buf'
> > > > type, commonly provided in the header <setjmp.h>.
> > > > [-Werror,-Wincomplete-setjmp-declaration]
> > > > extern long setjmp(long *);
> > > >             ^
> > > > ../arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h:11:13: error: declaration of
> > > > built-in function 'longjmp' requires the declaration of the 'jmp_buf'
> > > > type, commonly provided in the header <setjmp.h>.
> > > > [-Werror,-Wincomplete-setjmp-declaration]
> > > > extern void longjmp(long *, long);
> > > >             ^
> > > > 2 errors generated.
> > > >
> > > > Take the same approach as the above commit by disabling the warning for
> > > > the same reason, we provide our own longjmp/setjmp function.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
> > > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/625
> > > > Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3be25e79477db2d31ac46493d97eca8c20592b07
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > It may be worth using -fno-builtin-setjmp and -fno-builtin-longjmp
> > > > instead as it makes it clear to clang that we are not using the builtin
> > > > longjmp and setjmp functions, which I think is why these warnings are
> > > > appearing (at least according to the commit that introduced this waring).
> > > >
> > > > Sample patch:
> > > > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/625#issuecomment-519251372
> > >
> > > Couldn't we just add those flags to CFLAGS for the whole kernel? Rather
> > > than making them per-file.
> >
> > Yes, I don't think this would be unreasonable. Are you referring to the
> > cc-disable-warning flags or the -fno-builtin flags? I personally think
> > the -fno-builtin flags convey to clang what the kernel is intending to
> > do better than disabling the warnings outright.
> 
> The `-f` family of flags have dire implications for codegen, I'd
> really prefer we think long and hard before adding/removing them to
> suppress warnings.  I don't think it's a solution for this particular
> problem.

I am fine with whatever approach gets this warning fixed to the
maintainer's satisfaction...

However, I think that -fno-builtin-* would be appropriate here because
we are providing our own setjmp implementation, meaning clang should not
be trying to do anything with the builtin implementation like building a
declaration for it.

Cheers,
Nathan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	"# 3.4.x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:45:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190828184529.GC127646@archlinux-threadripper> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdmXbYrR6n-cxKt3XxkE4Lmj0sSoZBUtHVb0V2LTUFHmug@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:01:14AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:53 AM Nathan Chancellor
> <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:43:53PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Commit aea447141c7e ("powerpc: Disable -Wbuiltin-requires-header when
> > > > setjmp is used") disabled -Wbuiltin-requires-header because of a warning
> > > > about the setjmp and longjmp declarations.
> > > >
> > > > r367387 in clang added another diagnostic around this, complaining that
> > > > there is no jmp_buf declaration.
> > > >
> > > > In file included from ../arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c:47:
> > > > ../arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h:10:13: error: declaration of
> > > > built-in function 'setjmp' requires the declaration of the 'jmp_buf'
> > > > type, commonly provided in the header <setjmp.h>.
> > > > [-Werror,-Wincomplete-setjmp-declaration]
> > > > extern long setjmp(long *);
> > > >             ^
> > > > ../arch/powerpc/include/asm/setjmp.h:11:13: error: declaration of
> > > > built-in function 'longjmp' requires the declaration of the 'jmp_buf'
> > > > type, commonly provided in the header <setjmp.h>.
> > > > [-Werror,-Wincomplete-setjmp-declaration]
> > > > extern void longjmp(long *, long);
> > > >             ^
> > > > 2 errors generated.
> > > >
> > > > Take the same approach as the above commit by disabling the warning for
> > > > the same reason, we provide our own longjmp/setjmp function.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
> > > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/625
> > > > Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3be25e79477db2d31ac46493d97eca8c20592b07
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > It may be worth using -fno-builtin-setjmp and -fno-builtin-longjmp
> > > > instead as it makes it clear to clang that we are not using the builtin
> > > > longjmp and setjmp functions, which I think is why these warnings are
> > > > appearing (at least according to the commit that introduced this waring).
> > > >
> > > > Sample patch:
> > > > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/625#issuecomment-519251372
> > >
> > > Couldn't we just add those flags to CFLAGS for the whole kernel? Rather
> > > than making them per-file.
> >
> > Yes, I don't think this would be unreasonable. Are you referring to the
> > cc-disable-warning flags or the -fno-builtin flags? I personally think
> > the -fno-builtin flags convey to clang what the kernel is intending to
> > do better than disabling the warnings outright.
> 
> The `-f` family of flags have dire implications for codegen, I'd
> really prefer we think long and hard before adding/removing them to
> suppress warnings.  I don't think it's a solution for this particular
> problem.

I am fine with whatever approach gets this warning fixed to the
maintainer's satisfaction...

However, I think that -fno-builtin-* would be appropriate here because
we are providing our own setjmp implementation, meaning clang should not
be trying to do anything with the builtin implementation like building a
declaration for it.

Cheers,
Nathan

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-28 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-12  2:32 [PATCH] powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-12  2:32 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-12  5:37 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-08-12 16:55   ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-12 16:55     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-12 17:35 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-12 17:35   ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-27  0:12 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-27  0:12   ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-28 13:43 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-08-28 13:43   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-08-28 17:53   ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-28 17:53     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-28 18:01     ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-28 18:01       ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-28 18:45       ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2019-08-28 18:45         ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-28 22:16         ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-28 22:16           ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-29  8:32           ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-29  8:32             ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-29  9:59         ` David Laight
2019-09-03  5:55           ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-03  5:55             ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-03 19:31             ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-03 19:31               ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-04  0:24               ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-04  0:24                 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-04  8:16                 ` David Laight
2019-09-04 13:01                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-04 13:01                     ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-04 23:15                     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-04 23:15                       ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-10 18:30                       ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-10 18:30                         ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-10 18:37                         ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-10 18:37                           ` Nathan Chancellor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190828184529.GC127646@archlinux-threadripper \
    --to=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.