All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"# 3.4.x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 03:32:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190829083259.GI31406@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOd=wdscd7smcKZk40zD_n1OUVkhYYd7ZnoK8r1Y+pkvYVg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 03:16:19PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> That's a good reason IMO.  IIRC, the -fno-builtin-* flags don't warn
> if * is some unrecognized value, so -fno-builtin-setjmp may not
> actually do anything, and you may need to scan the source (of clang or
> llvm).

-fno-builtin-foo makes the compiler not handle "foo" the same as it
handles "__builtin_foo".  If the compiler has no idea about "foo", well,
that is exactly what it does then anyhow, so why would it warn :-)


Segher

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"# 3.4.x" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 03:32:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190829083259.GI31406@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOd=wdscd7smcKZk40zD_n1OUVkhYYd7ZnoK8r1Y+pkvYVg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 03:16:19PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> That's a good reason IMO.  IIRC, the -fno-builtin-* flags don't warn
> if * is some unrecognized value, so -fno-builtin-setjmp may not
> actually do anything, and you may need to scan the source (of clang or
> llvm).

-fno-builtin-foo makes the compiler not handle "foo" the same as it
handles "__builtin_foo".  If the compiler has no idea about "foo", well,
that is exactly what it does then anyhow, so why would it warn :-)


Segher

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-29  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-12  2:32 [PATCH] powerpc: Avoid clang warnings around setjmp and longjmp Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-12  2:32 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-12  5:37 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-08-12 16:55   ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-12 16:55     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-12 17:35 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-12 17:35   ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-27  0:12 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-27  0:12   ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-28 13:43 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-08-28 13:43   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-08-28 17:53   ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-28 17:53     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-28 18:01     ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-28 18:01       ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-28 18:45       ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-28 18:45         ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-08-28 22:16         ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-28 22:16           ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-08-29  8:32           ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2019-08-29  8:32             ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-29  9:59         ` David Laight
2019-09-03  5:55           ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-03  5:55             ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-03 19:31             ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-03 19:31               ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-04  0:24               ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-04  0:24                 ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-04  8:16                 ` David Laight
2019-09-04 13:01                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-04 13:01                     ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-09-04 23:15                     ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-04 23:15                       ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-10 18:30                       ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-10 18:30                         ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-10 18:37                         ` Nathan Chancellor
2019-09-10 18:37                           ` Nathan Chancellor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190829083259.GI31406@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.