* [PATCH net 1/4] llc: fix sk_buff leak in llc_sap_state_process()
2019-10-06 21:24 [PATCH net 0/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting Eric Biggers
@ 2019-10-06 21:24 ` Eric Biggers
2019-10-06 21:24 ` [PATCH net 2/4] llc: fix sk_buff leak in llc_conn_service() Eric Biggers
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2019-10-06 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
syzbot reported:
BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff888116270800 (size 224):
comm "syz-executor641", pid 7047, jiffies 4294947360 (age 13.860s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 20 e1 2a 81 88 ff ff 00 40 3d 2a 81 88 ff ff . .*.....@=*....
backtrace:
[<000000004d41b4cc>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:55 [inline]
[<000000004d41b4cc>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:439 [inline]
[<000000004d41b4cc>] slab_alloc_node mm/slab.c:3269 [inline]
[<000000004d41b4cc>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x153/0x2a0 mm/slab.c:3579
[<00000000506a5965>] __alloc_skb+0x6e/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:198
[<000000001ba5a161>] alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1058 [inline]
[<000000001ba5a161>] alloc_skb_with_frags+0x5f/0x250 net/core/skbuff.c:5327
[<0000000047d9c78b>] sock_alloc_send_pskb+0x269/0x2a0 net/core/sock.c:2225
[<000000003828fe54>] sock_alloc_send_skb+0x32/0x40 net/core/sock.c:2242
[<00000000e34d94f9>] llc_ui_sendmsg+0x10a/0x540 net/llc/af_llc.c:933
[<00000000de2de3fb>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:652 [inline]
[<00000000de2de3fb>] sock_sendmsg+0x54/0x70 net/socket.c:671
[<000000008fe16e7a>] __sys_sendto+0x148/0x1f0 net/socket.c:1964
[...]
The bug is that llc_sap_state_process() always takes an extra reference
to the skb, but sometimes neither llc_sap_next_state() nor
llc_sap_state_process() itself drops this reference.
Fix it by changing llc_sap_next_state() to never consume a reference to
the skb, rather than sometimes do so and sometimes not. Then remove the
extra skb_get() and kfree_skb() from llc_sap_state_process().
Reported-by: syzbot+6bf095f9becf5efef645@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+31c16aa4202dace3812e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
net/llc/llc_s_ac.c | 12 +++++++++---
net/llc/llc_sap.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/llc/llc_s_ac.c b/net/llc/llc_s_ac.c
index a94bd56bcac6..7ae4cc684d3a 100644
--- a/net/llc/llc_s_ac.c
+++ b/net/llc/llc_s_ac.c
@@ -58,8 +58,10 @@ int llc_sap_action_send_ui(struct llc_sap *sap, struct sk_buff *skb)
ev->daddr.lsap, LLC_PDU_CMD);
llc_pdu_init_as_ui_cmd(skb);
rc = llc_mac_hdr_init(skb, ev->saddr.mac, ev->daddr.mac);
- if (likely(!rc))
+ if (likely(!rc)) {
+ skb_get(skb);
rc = dev_queue_xmit(skb);
+ }
return rc;
}
@@ -81,8 +83,10 @@ int llc_sap_action_send_xid_c(struct llc_sap *sap, struct sk_buff *skb)
ev->daddr.lsap, LLC_PDU_CMD);
llc_pdu_init_as_xid_cmd(skb, LLC_XID_NULL_CLASS_2, 0);
rc = llc_mac_hdr_init(skb, ev->saddr.mac, ev->daddr.mac);
- if (likely(!rc))
+ if (likely(!rc)) {
+ skb_get(skb);
rc = dev_queue_xmit(skb);
+ }
return rc;
}
@@ -135,8 +139,10 @@ int llc_sap_action_send_test_c(struct llc_sap *sap, struct sk_buff *skb)
ev->daddr.lsap, LLC_PDU_CMD);
llc_pdu_init_as_test_cmd(skb);
rc = llc_mac_hdr_init(skb, ev->saddr.mac, ev->daddr.mac);
- if (likely(!rc))
+ if (likely(!rc)) {
+ skb_get(skb);
rc = dev_queue_xmit(skb);
+ }
return rc;
}
diff --git a/net/llc/llc_sap.c b/net/llc/llc_sap.c
index a7f7b8ff4729..be419062e19a 100644
--- a/net/llc/llc_sap.c
+++ b/net/llc/llc_sap.c
@@ -197,29 +197,22 @@ static int llc_sap_next_state(struct llc_sap *sap, struct sk_buff *skb)
* After executing actions of the event, upper layer will be indicated
* if needed(on receiving an UI frame). sk can be null for the
* datalink_proto case.
+ *
+ * This function always consumes a reference to the skb.
*/
static void llc_sap_state_process(struct llc_sap *sap, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct llc_sap_state_ev *ev = llc_sap_ev(skb);
- /*
- * We have to hold the skb, because llc_sap_next_state
- * will kfree it in the sending path and we need to
- * look at the skb->cb, where we encode llc_sap_state_ev.
- */
- skb_get(skb);
ev->ind_cfm_flag = 0;
llc_sap_next_state(sap, skb);
- if (ev->ind_cfm_flag == LLC_IND) {
- if (skb->sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN)
- kfree_skb(skb);
- else {
- llc_save_primitive(skb->sk, skb, ev->prim);
- /* queue skb to the user. */
- if (sock_queue_rcv_skb(skb->sk, skb))
- kfree_skb(skb);
- }
+ if (ev->ind_cfm_flag == LLC_IND && skb->sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN) {
+ llc_save_primitive(skb->sk, skb, ev->prim);
+
+ /* queue skb to the user. */
+ if (sock_queue_rcv_skb(skb->sk, skb) == 0)
+ return;
}
kfree_skb(skb);
}
--
2.23.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH net 2/4] llc: fix sk_buff leak in llc_conn_service()
2019-10-06 21:24 [PATCH net 0/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting Eric Biggers
2019-10-06 21:24 ` [PATCH net 1/4] llc: fix sk_buff leak in llc_sap_state_process() Eric Biggers
@ 2019-10-06 21:24 ` Eric Biggers
2019-10-06 21:24 ` [PATCH net 3/4] llc: fix another potential sk_buff leak in llc_ui_sendmsg() Eric Biggers
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2019-10-06 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
syzbot reported:
BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff88811eb3de00 (size 224):
comm "syz-executor559", pid 7315, jiffies 4294943019 (age 10.300s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 a0 38 24 81 88 ff ff 00 c0 f2 15 81 88 ff ff ..8$............
backtrace:
[<000000008d1c66a1>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive include/linux/kmemleak.h:55 [inline]
[<000000008d1c66a1>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:439 [inline]
[<000000008d1c66a1>] slab_alloc_node mm/slab.c:3269 [inline]
[<000000008d1c66a1>] kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x153/0x2a0 mm/slab.c:3579
[<00000000447d9496>] __alloc_skb+0x6e/0x210 net/core/skbuff.c:198
[<000000000cdbf82f>] alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:1058 [inline]
[<000000000cdbf82f>] llc_alloc_frame+0x66/0x110 net/llc/llc_sap.c:54
[<000000002418b52e>] llc_conn_ac_send_sabme_cmd_p_set_x+0x2f/0x140 net/llc/llc_c_ac.c:777
[<000000001372ae17>] llc_exec_conn_trans_actions net/llc/llc_conn.c:475 [inline]
[<000000001372ae17>] llc_conn_service net/llc/llc_conn.c:400 [inline]
[<000000001372ae17>] llc_conn_state_process+0x1ac/0x640 net/llc/llc_conn.c:75
[<00000000f27e53c1>] llc_establish_connection+0x110/0x170 net/llc/llc_if.c:109
[<00000000291b2ca0>] llc_ui_connect+0x10e/0x370 net/llc/af_llc.c:477
[<000000000f9c740b>] __sys_connect+0x11d/0x170 net/socket.c:1840
[...]
The bug is that most callers of llc_conn_send_pdu() assume it consumes a
reference to the skb, when actually due to commit b85ab56c3f81 ("llc:
properly handle dev_queue_xmit() return value") it doesn't.
Revert most of that commit, and instead make the few places that need
llc_conn_send_pdu() to *not* consume a reference call skb_get() before.
Fixes: b85ab56c3f81 ("llc: properly handle dev_queue_xmit() return value")
Reported-by: syzbot+6b825a6494a04cc0e3f7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
include/net/llc_conn.h | 2 +-
net/llc/llc_c_ac.c | 8 ++++++--
net/llc/llc_conn.c | 32 +++++++++-----------------------
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/llc_conn.h b/include/net/llc_conn.h
index df528a623548..ea985aa7a6c5 100644
--- a/include/net/llc_conn.h
+++ b/include/net/llc_conn.h
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void llc_sk_reset(struct sock *sk);
/* Access to a connection */
int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
-int llc_conn_send_pdu(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+void llc_conn_send_pdu(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
void llc_conn_rtn_pdu(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
void llc_conn_resend_i_pdu_as_cmd(struct sock *sk, u8 nr, u8 first_p_bit);
void llc_conn_resend_i_pdu_as_rsp(struct sock *sk, u8 nr, u8 first_f_bit);
diff --git a/net/llc/llc_c_ac.c b/net/llc/llc_c_ac.c
index 4d78375f9872..647c0554d04c 100644
--- a/net/llc/llc_c_ac.c
+++ b/net/llc/llc_c_ac.c
@@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ int llc_conn_ac_send_i_cmd_p_set_1(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
llc_pdu_init_as_i_cmd(skb, 1, llc->vS, llc->vR);
rc = llc_mac_hdr_init(skb, llc->dev->dev_addr, llc->daddr.mac);
if (likely(!rc)) {
+ skb_get(skb);
llc_conn_send_pdu(sk, skb);
llc_conn_ac_inc_vs_by_1(sk, skb);
}
@@ -389,7 +390,8 @@ static int llc_conn_ac_send_i_cmd_p_set_0(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
llc_pdu_init_as_i_cmd(skb, 0, llc->vS, llc->vR);
rc = llc_mac_hdr_init(skb, llc->dev->dev_addr, llc->daddr.mac);
if (likely(!rc)) {
- rc = llc_conn_send_pdu(sk, skb);
+ skb_get(skb);
+ llc_conn_send_pdu(sk, skb);
llc_conn_ac_inc_vs_by_1(sk, skb);
}
return rc;
@@ -406,6 +408,7 @@ int llc_conn_ac_send_i_xxx_x_set_0(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
llc_pdu_init_as_i_cmd(skb, 0, llc->vS, llc->vR);
rc = llc_mac_hdr_init(skb, llc->dev->dev_addr, llc->daddr.mac);
if (likely(!rc)) {
+ skb_get(skb);
llc_conn_send_pdu(sk, skb);
llc_conn_ac_inc_vs_by_1(sk, skb);
}
@@ -916,7 +919,8 @@ static int llc_conn_ac_send_i_rsp_f_set_ackpf(struct sock *sk,
llc_pdu_init_as_i_cmd(skb, llc->ack_pf, llc->vS, llc->vR);
rc = llc_mac_hdr_init(skb, llc->dev->dev_addr, llc->daddr.mac);
if (likely(!rc)) {
- rc = llc_conn_send_pdu(sk, skb);
+ skb_get(skb);
+ llc_conn_send_pdu(sk, skb);
llc_conn_ac_inc_vs_by_1(sk, skb);
}
return rc;
diff --git a/net/llc/llc_conn.c b/net/llc/llc_conn.c
index 4ff89cb7c86f..ed2aca12460c 100644
--- a/net/llc/llc_conn.c
+++ b/net/llc/llc_conn.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
#endif
static int llc_find_offset(int state, int ev_type);
-static int llc_conn_send_pdus(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
+static void llc_conn_send_pdus(struct sock *sk);
static int llc_conn_service(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
static int llc_exec_conn_trans_actions(struct sock *sk,
struct llc_conn_state_trans *trans,
@@ -193,11 +193,11 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
return rc;
}
-int llc_conn_send_pdu(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
+void llc_conn_send_pdu(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
/* queue PDU to send to MAC layer */
skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_write_queue, skb);
- return llc_conn_send_pdus(sk, skb);
+ llc_conn_send_pdus(sk);
}
/**
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void llc_conn_resend_i_pdu_as_cmd(struct sock *sk, u8 nr, u8 first_p_bit)
if (howmany_resend > 0)
llc->vS = (llc->vS + 1) % LLC_2_SEQ_NBR_MODULO;
/* any PDUs to re-send are queued up; start sending to MAC */
- llc_conn_send_pdus(sk, NULL);
+ llc_conn_send_pdus(sk);
out:;
}
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ void llc_conn_resend_i_pdu_as_rsp(struct sock *sk, u8 nr, u8 first_f_bit)
if (howmany_resend > 0)
llc->vS = (llc->vS + 1) % LLC_2_SEQ_NBR_MODULO;
/* any PDUs to re-send are queued up; start sending to MAC */
- llc_conn_send_pdus(sk, NULL);
+ llc_conn_send_pdus(sk);
out:;
}
@@ -340,16 +340,12 @@ int llc_conn_remove_acked_pdus(struct sock *sk, u8 nr, u16 *how_many_unacked)
/**
* llc_conn_send_pdus - Sends queued PDUs
* @sk: active connection
- * @hold_skb: the skb held by caller, or NULL if does not care
*
- * Sends queued pdus to MAC layer for transmission. When @hold_skb is
- * NULL, always return 0. Otherwise, return 0 if @hold_skb is sent
- * successfully, or 1 for failure.
+ * Sends queued pdus to MAC layer for transmission.
*/
-static int llc_conn_send_pdus(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *hold_skb)
+static void llc_conn_send_pdus(struct sock *sk)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
- int ret = 0;
while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&sk->sk_write_queue)) != NULL) {
struct llc_pdu_sn *pdu = llc_pdu_sn_hdr(skb);
@@ -361,20 +357,10 @@ static int llc_conn_send_pdus(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *hold_skb)
skb_queue_tail(&llc_sk(sk)->pdu_unack_q, skb);
if (!skb2)
break;
- dev_queue_xmit(skb2);
- } else {
- bool is_target = skb == hold_skb;
- int rc;
-
- if (is_target)
- skb_get(skb);
- rc = dev_queue_xmit(skb);
- if (is_target)
- ret = rc;
+ skb = skb2;
}
+ dev_queue_xmit(skb);
}
-
- return ret;
}
/**
--
2.23.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH net 3/4] llc: fix another potential sk_buff leak in llc_ui_sendmsg()
2019-10-06 21:24 [PATCH net 0/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting Eric Biggers
2019-10-06 21:24 ` [PATCH net 1/4] llc: fix sk_buff leak in llc_sap_state_process() Eric Biggers
2019-10-06 21:24 ` [PATCH net 2/4] llc: fix sk_buff leak in llc_conn_service() Eric Biggers
@ 2019-10-06 21:24 ` Eric Biggers
2019-10-06 21:24 ` [PATCH net 4/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting in llc_conn_state_process() Eric Biggers
2019-10-08 21:15 ` [PATCH net 0/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting Jakub Kicinski
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2019-10-06 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
All callers of llc_conn_state_process() except llc_build_and_send_pkt()
(via llc_ui_sendmsg() -> llc_ui_send_data()) assume that it always
consumes a reference to the skb. Fix this caller to do the same.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
net/llc/af_llc.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
net/llc/llc_conn.c | 2 ++
net/llc/llc_if.c | 12 ++++++++----
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/llc/af_llc.c b/net/llc/af_llc.c
index 2017b7d780f5..c74f44dfaa22 100644
--- a/net/llc/af_llc.c
+++ b/net/llc/af_llc.c
@@ -113,22 +113,26 @@ static inline u8 llc_ui_header_len(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_llc *addr)
*
* Send data via reliable llc2 connection.
* Returns 0 upon success, non-zero if action did not succeed.
+ *
+ * This function always consumes a reference to the skb.
*/
static int llc_ui_send_data(struct sock* sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int noblock)
{
struct llc_sock* llc = llc_sk(sk);
- int rc = 0;
if (unlikely(llc_data_accept_state(llc->state) ||
llc->remote_busy_flag ||
llc->p_flag)) {
long timeout = sock_sndtimeo(sk, noblock);
+ int rc;
rc = llc_ui_wait_for_busy_core(sk, timeout);
+ if (rc) {
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return rc;
+ }
}
- if (unlikely(!rc))
- rc = llc_build_and_send_pkt(sk, skb);
- return rc;
+ return llc_build_and_send_pkt(sk, skb);
}
static void llc_ui_sk_init(struct socket *sock, struct sock *sk)
@@ -899,7 +903,7 @@ static int llc_ui_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
DECLARE_SOCKADDR(struct sockaddr_llc *, addr, msg->msg_name);
int flags = msg->msg_flags;
int noblock = flags & MSG_DONTWAIT;
- struct sk_buff *skb;
+ struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
size_t size = 0;
int rc = -EINVAL, copied = 0, hdrlen;
@@ -908,10 +912,10 @@ static int llc_ui_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
lock_sock(sk);
if (addr) {
if (msg->msg_namelen < sizeof(*addr))
- goto release;
+ goto out;
} else {
if (llc_ui_addr_null(&llc->addr))
- goto release;
+ goto out;
addr = &llc->addr;
}
/* must bind connection to sap if user hasn't done it. */
@@ -919,7 +923,7 @@ static int llc_ui_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
/* bind to sap with null dev, exclusive. */
rc = llc_ui_autobind(sock, addr);
if (rc)
- goto release;
+ goto out;
}
hdrlen = llc->dev->hard_header_len + llc_ui_header_len(sk, addr);
size = hdrlen + len;
@@ -928,12 +932,12 @@ static int llc_ui_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
copied = size - hdrlen;
rc = -EINVAL;
if (copied < 0)
- goto release;
+ goto out;
release_sock(sk);
skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, size, noblock, &rc);
lock_sock(sk);
if (!skb)
- goto release;
+ goto out;
skb->dev = llc->dev;
skb->protocol = llc_proto_type(addr->sllc_arphrd);
skb_reserve(skb, hdrlen);
@@ -943,29 +947,31 @@ static int llc_ui_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM || addr->sllc_ua) {
llc_build_and_send_ui_pkt(llc->sap, skb, addr->sllc_mac,
addr->sllc_sap);
+ skb = NULL;
goto out;
}
if (addr->sllc_test) {
llc_build_and_send_test_pkt(llc->sap, skb, addr->sllc_mac,
addr->sllc_sap);
+ skb = NULL;
goto out;
}
if (addr->sllc_xid) {
llc_build_and_send_xid_pkt(llc->sap, skb, addr->sllc_mac,
addr->sllc_sap);
+ skb = NULL;
goto out;
}
rc = -ENOPROTOOPT;
if (!(sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM && !addr->sllc_ua))
goto out;
rc = llc_ui_send_data(sk, skb, noblock);
+ skb = NULL;
out:
- if (rc) {
- kfree_skb(skb);
-release:
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ if (rc)
dprintk("%s: failed sending from %02X to %02X: %d\n",
__func__, llc->laddr.lsap, llc->daddr.lsap, rc);
- }
release_sock(sk);
return rc ? : copied;
}
diff --git a/net/llc/llc_conn.c b/net/llc/llc_conn.c
index ed2aca12460c..0b0c6f12153b 100644
--- a/net/llc/llc_conn.c
+++ b/net/llc/llc_conn.c
@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ int sysctl_llc2_busy_timeout = LLC2_BUSY_TIME * HZ;
* (executing it's actions and changing state), upper layer will be
* indicated or confirmed, if needed. Returns 0 for success, 1 for
* failure. The socket lock has to be held before calling this function.
+ *
+ * This function always consumes a reference to the skb.
*/
int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
diff --git a/net/llc/llc_if.c b/net/llc/llc_if.c
index 8db03c2d5440..ad6547736c21 100644
--- a/net/llc/llc_if.c
+++ b/net/llc/llc_if.c
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
* closed and -EBUSY when sending data is not permitted in this state or
* LLC has send an I pdu with p bit set to 1 and is waiting for it's
* response.
+ *
+ * This function always consumes a reference to the skb.
*/
int llc_build_and_send_pkt(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
@@ -46,20 +48,22 @@ int llc_build_and_send_pkt(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct llc_sock *llc = llc_sk(sk);
if (unlikely(llc->state == LLC_CONN_STATE_ADM))
- goto out;
+ goto out_free;
rc = -EBUSY;
if (unlikely(llc_data_accept_state(llc->state) || /* data_conn_refuse */
llc->p_flag)) {
llc->failed_data_req = 1;
- goto out;
+ goto out_free;
}
ev = llc_conn_ev(skb);
ev->type = LLC_CONN_EV_TYPE_PRIM;
ev->prim = LLC_DATA_PRIM;
ev->prim_type = LLC_PRIM_TYPE_REQ;
skb->dev = llc->dev;
- rc = llc_conn_state_process(sk, skb);
-out:
+ return llc_conn_state_process(sk, skb);
+
+out_free:
+ kfree_skb(skb);
return rc;
}
--
2.23.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH net 4/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting in llc_conn_state_process()
2019-10-06 21:24 [PATCH net 0/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting Eric Biggers
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2019-10-06 21:24 ` [PATCH net 3/4] llc: fix another potential sk_buff leak in llc_ui_sendmsg() Eric Biggers
@ 2019-10-06 21:24 ` Eric Biggers
2019-10-08 21:15 ` [PATCH net 0/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting Jakub Kicinski
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Biggers @ 2019-10-06 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
If llc_conn_state_process() sees that llc_conn_service() put the skb on
a list, it will drop one fewer references to it. This is wrong because
the current behavior is that llc_conn_service() never consumes a
reference to the skb.
The code also makes the number of skb references being dropped
conditional on which of ind_prim and cfm_prim are nonzero, yet neither
of these affects how many references are *acquired*. So there is extra
code that tries to fix this up by sometimes taking another reference.
Remove the unnecessary/broken refcounting logic and instead just add an
skb_get() before the only two places where an extra reference is
actually consumed.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
net/llc/llc_conn.c | 33 ++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/llc/llc_conn.c b/net/llc/llc_conn.c
index 0b0c6f12153b..a79b739eb223 100644
--- a/net/llc/llc_conn.c
+++ b/net/llc/llc_conn.c
@@ -64,12 +64,6 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
struct llc_sock *llc = llc_sk(skb->sk);
struct llc_conn_state_ev *ev = llc_conn_ev(skb);
- /*
- * We have to hold the skb, because llc_conn_service will kfree it in
- * the sending path and we need to look at the skb->cb, where we encode
- * llc_conn_state_ev.
- */
- skb_get(skb);
ev->ind_prim = ev->cfm_prim = 0;
/*
* Send event to state machine
@@ -77,21 +71,12 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
rc = llc_conn_service(skb->sk, skb);
if (unlikely(rc != 0)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: llc_conn_service failed\n", __func__);
- goto out_kfree_skb;
- }
-
- if (unlikely(!ev->ind_prim && !ev->cfm_prim)) {
- /* indicate or confirm not required */
- if (!skb->next)
- goto out_kfree_skb;
goto out_skb_put;
}
- if (unlikely(ev->ind_prim && ev->cfm_prim)) /* Paranoia */
- skb_get(skb);
-
switch (ev->ind_prim) {
case LLC_DATA_PRIM:
+ skb_get(skb);
llc_save_primitive(sk, skb, LLC_DATA_PRIM);
if (unlikely(sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb))) {
/*
@@ -108,6 +93,7 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
* skb->sk pointing to the newly created struct sock in
* llc_conn_handler. -acme
*/
+ skb_get(skb);
skb_queue_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
break;
@@ -123,7 +109,6 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
}
}
- kfree_skb(skb);
sock_put(sk);
break;
case LLC_RESET_PRIM:
@@ -132,14 +117,11 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
* RESET is not being notified to upper layers for now
*/
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: received a reset ind!\n", __func__);
- kfree_skb(skb);
break;
default:
- if (ev->ind_prim) {
+ if (ev->ind_prim)
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: received unknown %d prim!\n",
__func__, ev->ind_prim);
- kfree_skb(skb);
- }
/* No indication */
break;
}
@@ -181,15 +163,12 @@ int llc_conn_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: received a reset conf!\n", __func__);
break;
default:
- if (ev->cfm_prim) {
+ if (ev->cfm_prim)
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: received unknown %d prim!\n",
__func__, ev->cfm_prim);
- break;
- }
- goto out_skb_put; /* No confirmation */
+ /* No confirmation */
+ break;
}
-out_kfree_skb:
- kfree_skb(skb);
out_skb_put:
kfree_skb(skb);
return rc;
--
2.23.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net 0/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting
2019-10-06 21:24 [PATCH net 0/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting Eric Biggers
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2019-10-06 21:24 ` [PATCH net 4/4] llc: fix sk_buff refcounting in llc_conn_state_process() Eric Biggers
@ 2019-10-08 21:15 ` Jakub Kicinski
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2019-10-08 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Biggers; +Cc: netdev
On Sun, 6 Oct 2019 14:24:23 -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Patches 1-2 fix the memory leaks that syzbot has reported in net/llc:
>
> memory leak in llc_ui_create (2)
> memory leak in llc_ui_sendmsg
> memory leak in llc_conn_ac_send_sabme_cmd_p_set_x
>
> Patches 3-4 fix related bugs that I noticed while reading this code.
>
> Note: I've tested that this fixes the syzbot bugs, but otherwise I don't
> know of any way to test this code.
Applied, thanks Eric.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread