From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: "Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)" <david.safford@ge.com>,
Ken Goldman <kgold@linux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:CRYPTO API" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: asym_tpm: Switch to get_random_bytes()
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:00:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191016110031.GE10184@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1571081397.3728.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:29:57PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> The job of the in-kernel rng is simply to produce a mixed entropy pool
> from which we can draw random numbers. The idea is that quite a few
> attackers have identified the rng as being a weak point in the security
> architecture of the kernel, so if we mix entropy from all the sources
> we have, you have to compromise most of them to gain some predictive
> power over the rng sequence.
The documentation says that krng is suitable for key generation.
Should the documentation changed to state that it is unsuitable?
> The point is not how certified the TPM RNG is, the point is that it's a
> single source and if we rely on it solely for some applications, like
> trusted keys, then it gives the attackers a single known point to go
> after. This may be impossible for script kiddies, but it won't be for
> nation states ... are you going to exclusively trust the random number
> you got from your chinese certified TPM?
I'd suggest approach where TPM RNG result is xored with krng result.
> Remember also that the attack doesn't have to be to the TPM only, it
> could be the pathway by which we get the random number, which involves
> components outside of the TPM certification.
Yeah, I do get this.
/Jarkko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: "Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)" <david.safford@ge.com>,
Ken Goldman <kgold@linux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:ASYMMETRIC KEYS" <keyrings@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:CRYPTO API" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KEYS: asym_tpm: Switch to get_random_bytes()
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:00:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191016110031.GE10184@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1571081397.3728.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:29:57PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> The job of the in-kernel rng is simply to produce a mixed entropy pool
> from which we can draw random numbers. The idea is that quite a few
> attackers have identified the rng as being a weak point in the security
> architecture of the kernel, so if we mix entropy from all the sources
> we have, you have to compromise most of them to gain some predictive
> power over the rng sequence.
The documentation says that krng is suitable for key generation.
Should the documentation changed to state that it is unsuitable?
> The point is not how certified the TPM RNG is, the point is that it's a
> single source and if we rely on it solely for some applications, like
> trusted keys, then it gives the attackers a single known point to go
> after. This may be impossible for script kiddies, but it won't be for
> nation states ... are you going to exclusively trust the random number
> you got from your chinese certified TPM?
I'd suggest approach where TPM RNG result is xored with krng result.
> Remember also that the attack doesn't have to be to the TPM only, it
> could be the pathway by which we get the random number, which involves
> components outside of the TPM certification.
Yeah, I do get this.
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-16 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 116+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-26 17:16 [PATCH] KEYS: asym_tpm: Switch to get_random_bytes() Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-26 17:16 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-09-28 18:05 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-09-28 18:05 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-01 20:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-01 20:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-02 14:00 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-02 14:00 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 11:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 11:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 11:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 11:43 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 13:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 13:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 17:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 17:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 18:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 18:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 21:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 21:51 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 21:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 21:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 22:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 22:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-03 23:59 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-03 23:59 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-04 18:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 18:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 18:24 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-04 18:24 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-04 18:33 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-04 18:33 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-04 18:42 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-04 18:42 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-04 20:07 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-04 20:07 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-04 20:11 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-04 20:11 ` Jerry Snitselaar
2019-10-04 22:11 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-04 22:11 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-06 0:38 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-06 0:38 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-06 23:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-06 23:52 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-07 18:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-07 18:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-04 18:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 18:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 22:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 22:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 13:26 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)
2019-10-04 13:26 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)
2019-10-04 18:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 18:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 18:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 18:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-04 19:56 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)
2019-10-04 19:56 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)
2019-10-07 0:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-07 0:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-07 22:13 ` Ken Goldman
2019-10-07 22:13 ` Ken Goldman
2019-10-08 23:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-08 23:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-08 23:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-08 23:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-09 7:10 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-10-09 7:10 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-10-09 7:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-09 7:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-09 7:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-09 7:41 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-09 8:09 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-10-09 8:09 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-10-14 19:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-14 19:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-09 8:02 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-10-09 8:02 ` Pascal Van Leeuwen
2019-10-09 12:11 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)
2019-10-09 12:11 ` Safford, David (GE Global Research, US)
2019-10-14 19:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-14 19:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-14 19:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-14 19:29 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-14 19:29 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-14 19:29 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-16 11:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2019-10-16 11:00 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-16 12:34 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-16 12:34 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-16 16:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-16 16:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-16 19:10 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-16 19:10 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-17 12:52 ` Sumit Garg
2019-10-17 12:52 ` Sumit Garg
2019-10-17 12:58 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-17 12:58 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-17 18:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-17 18:04 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-21 11:39 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-21 11:39 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-29 8:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-29 8:42 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-29 14:58 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-29 14:58 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-31 21:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-31 21:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-18 7:32 ` Janne Karhunen
2019-10-18 7:32 ` Janne Karhunen
2019-10-03 18:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 18:02 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 18:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-03 18:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-10-07 10:33 ` Janne Karhunen
2019-10-07 10:33 ` Janne Karhunen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191016110031.GE10184@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=david.safford@ge.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kgold@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.