Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Simplify MFD Core

From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	stephan@gerhold.net, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	James Cameron <quozl@laptop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Simplify MFD Core
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:53:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191021115339.GF4365@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5e7695cc82b4370752f45082be007dbe410c74c.camel@v3.sk>

On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Lubomir Rintel wrote:

> On Mon, 2019-10-21 at 13:29 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:58 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > MFD currently has one over-complicated user.  CS5535 uses a mixture of
> > > cell cloning, reference counting and subsystem-level call-backs to
> > > achieve its goal of requesting an IO memory region only once across 3
> > > consumers.  The same can be achieved by handling the region centrally
> > > during the parent device's .probe() sequence.  Releasing can be handed
> > > in a similar way during .remove().
> > > 
> > > While we're here, take the opportunity to provide some clean-ups and
> > > error checking to issues noticed along the way.
> > > 
> > > This also paves the way for clean cell disabling via Device Tree being
> > > discussed at [0]
> > > 
> > > [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/18/612.
> > 
> > As the CS5535 is primarily used on the OLPC XO1, it would be
> > good to have someone test the series on such a machine.
> > 
> > I've added a few people to Cc that may be able to help test it, or
> > know someone who can.
> > 
> > For the actual patches, see
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191021105822.20271-1-lee.jones@linaro.org/T/#t
> 
> Thanks for the pointer. I'd by happy to test this.
> 
> Which tree do the patches apply to?
> Or, better, is there a tree with the patches applied that I could use?

Ideal.  Thank you.

http://git.linaro.org/people/lee.jones/linux.git/log/?h=topic/mfd-remove-clone-cs5535-mfd

> > > Lee Jones (9):
> > >   mfd: cs5535-mfd: Use PLATFORM_DEVID_* defines and tidy error message
> > >   mfd: cs5535-mfd: Remove mfd_cell->id hack
> > >   mfd: cs5535-mfd: Request shared IO regions centrally
> > >   mfd: cs5535-mfd: Register clients using their own dedicated MFD cell
> > >     entries
> > >   mfd: mfd-core: Remove mfd_clone_cell()
> > >   x86: olpc: Remove invocation of MFD's .enable()/.disable() call-backs
> > >   mfd: mfd-core: Protect against NULL call-back function pointer
> > >   mfd: mfd-core: Remove usage counting for .{en,dis}able() call-backs
> > >   mfd: mfd-core: Move pdev->mfd_cell creation back into mfd_add_device()
> > > 
> > >  arch/x86/platform/olpc/olpc-xo1-pm.c |   6 --
> > >  drivers/mfd/cs5535-mfd.c             | 124 +++++++++++++--------------
> > >  drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c               | 113 ++++--------------------
> > >  include/linux/mfd/core.h             |  20 -----
> > >  4 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 184 deletions(-)
> > > 
> 

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel