From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Mihail Atanassov <Mihail.Atanassov@arm.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"james qian wang (Arm Technology China)"
<james.qian.wang@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Subject: Re: [RFC,3/3] drm/komeda: Allow non-component drm_bridge only endpoints
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:42:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191022144207.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uHZ1Lw03LhZVH=oAa92WxZXucqooH1w6SG8HG20+g0Rbg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:50:42AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:48 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > I had a patches, which is why I raised the problem with the core:
> >
> > 6961edfee26d bridge hacks using device links
> >
> > but it never went further than an experiment at the time because of the
> > problems in the core. As it was a hack, it never got posted. Seems
> > that kernel tree (for the cubox) is still 5.2 based, so has a lot of
> > patches and might need updating to a more recent base before anything
> > can be tested.
>
>
> For reference, the panel patch:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10364873/
>
> And the huge discussion around bridges, that resulted in Rafael
> Wyzocki fixing all the core issues:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg201927.html
>
> James, do you want to look into this for bridges?
I can now confirm that it does work.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"james qian wang (Arm Technology China)"
<james.qian.wang@arm.com>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Mihail Atanassov <Mihail.Atanassov@arm.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Subject: Re: [RFC,3/3] drm/komeda: Allow non-component drm_bridge only endpoints
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:42:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191022144207.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uHZ1Lw03LhZVH=oAa92WxZXucqooH1w6SG8HG20+g0Rbg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:50:42AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:48 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > I had a patches, which is why I raised the problem with the core:
> >
> > 6961edfee26d bridge hacks using device links
> >
> > but it never went further than an experiment at the time because of the
> > problems in the core. As it was a hack, it never got posted. Seems
> > that kernel tree (for the cubox) is still 5.2 based, so has a lot of
> > patches and might need updating to a more recent base before anything
> > can be tested.
>
>
> For reference, the panel patch:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10364873/
>
> And the huge discussion around bridges, that resulted in Rafael
> Wyzocki fixing all the core issues:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg201927.html
>
> James, do you want to look into this for bridges?
I can now confirm that it does work.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-22 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-04 14:34 [PATCH 0/3] drm/komeda: Support for drm_bridge endpoints Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-04 14:34 ` Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-04 14:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/komeda: Consolidate struct komeda_drv allocations Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-04 14:34 ` Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-04 14:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/komeda: Memory manage struct komeda_drv in probe/remove Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-04 14:34 ` Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-04 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] drm/komeda: Allow non-component drm_bridge only endpoints Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-04 14:34 ` Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-09 5:54 ` [RFC,3/3] " james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-09 5:54 ` james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-16 15:51 ` Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-16 15:51 ` Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-16 16:22 ` Brian Starkey
2019-10-17 3:07 ` james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-17 3:07 ` james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-17 8:20 ` Brian Starkey
2019-10-17 8:20 ` Brian Starkey
2019-10-17 10:21 ` james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-17 10:21 ` james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-17 10:48 ` Brian Starkey
2019-10-17 10:48 ` Brian Starkey
2019-10-17 11:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-10-17 11:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-10-18 6:57 ` james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-18 6:57 ` james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-18 9:12 ` Brian Starkey
2019-10-18 9:12 ` Brian Starkey
2019-10-22 8:42 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-10-22 8:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-10-22 8:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-10-22 14:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-10-22 14:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-10-22 14:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-10-22 14:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-10-24 8:03 ` Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-24 8:03 ` Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-24 8:03 ` Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-24 5:21 ` james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-24 5:21 ` james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-18 6:38 ` james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-18 11:01 ` Mihail Atanassov
2019-10-18 11:01 ` Mihail Atanassov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191022144207.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Mihail.Atanassov@arm.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=james.qian.wang@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.