Re: [PATCH v3 06/32] mtd: spi-nor: Use dev_err() instead of pr_err()

[Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>]

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:16:57 +0000
<Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com> wrote:

> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
> 
> Print identifying information about struct device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> index e801f390728c..c794eff69fe9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static int spi_nor_read_sr(struct spi_nor *nor)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (ret) {
> -		pr_err("error %d reading SR\n", ret);
> +		dev_err(nor->dev, "error %d reading SR\n", ret);

nor->dev is not exactly what we should use since it points to the SPI
NOR controller device in the !SPI_MEM case, and those controllers can
be attached several SPI NOR devs. Ideally we should use mtd->dev, but
that requires splitting the MTD initialization and registration steps
so mtd->dev can have a valid name before registration time.

Anyway, I guess this change is good enough for now, just mentioned the
problem in case anyone is interested working on it.

Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>

>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static int spi_nor_read_fsr(struct spi_nor *nor)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (ret) {
> -		pr_err("error %d reading FSR\n", ret);
> +		dev_err(nor->dev, "error %d reading FSR\n", ret);
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  


______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/