From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [V3 6/8] drm/i915/dsi: Configure TE interrupt for cmd mode
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 04:23:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201911200436.S9npEYVh%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119123316.5094-7-vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6485 bytes --]
Hi Vandita,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc8 next-20191118]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vandita-Kulkarni/Add-support-for-mipi-dsi-cmd-mode/20191120-015713
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
config: i386-defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-14) 7.4.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:46:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:39:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c: In function 'gen11_dsi_configure_te':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2590:19: error: implicit declaration of function 'DSI_INTR_MASK_REG'; did you mean 'TSFS_INTR_MASK'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
tmp = I915_READ(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port));
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1979:45: note: in definition of macro '__I915_REG_OP'
intel_uncore_##op__(&(dev_priv__)->uncore, __VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2590:9: note: in expansion of macro 'I915_READ'
tmp = I915_READ(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port));
^~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1981:57: error: incompatible type for argument 2 of 'intel_uncore_read'
#define I915_READ(reg__) __I915_REG_OP(read, dev_priv, (reg__))
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1979:45: note: in definition of macro '__I915_REG_OP'
intel_uncore_##op__(&(dev_priv__)->uncore, __VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2590:9: note: in expansion of macro 'I915_READ'
tmp = I915_READ(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port));
^~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h:9:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h:9,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h:16,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:81,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:46,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:39:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:287:22: note: expected 'i915_reg_t {aka struct <anonymous>}' but argument is of type 'int'
static inline u##x__ intel_uncore_##name__(struct intel_uncore *uncore, \
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:302:1: note: in expansion of macro '__uncore_read'
__uncore_read(read, 32, l, true)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2592:11: error: 'DSI_TE_EVENT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'DEFINE_EVENT'?
tmp &= ~DSI_TE_EVENT;
^~~~~~~~~~~~
DEFINE_EVENT
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2592:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:46:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:39:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1982:65: error: incompatible type for argument 2 of 'intel_uncore_write'
#define I915_WRITE(reg__, val__) __I915_REG_OP(write, dev_priv, (reg__), (val__))
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1979:45: note: in definition of macro '__I915_REG_OP'
intel_uncore_##op__(&(dev_priv__)->uncore, __VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2596:2: note: in expansion of macro 'I915_WRITE'
I915_WRITE(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port), tmp);
^~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h:9:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h:9,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h:16,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:81,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:46,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:39:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:294:20: note: expected 'i915_reg_t {aka struct <anonymous>}' but argument is of type 'int'
static inline void intel_uncore_##name__(struct intel_uncore *uncore, \
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:308:1: note: in expansion of macro '__uncore_write'
__uncore_write(write, 32, l, true)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c: In function 'gen8_de_irq_postinstall':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:3401:22: error: 'DSI0_TE' undeclared (first use in this function)
de_port_masked |= DSI0_TE | DSI1_TE;
^~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:3401:32: error: 'DSI1_TE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'DSI0_TE'?
de_port_masked |= DSI0_TE | DSI1_TE;
^~~~~~~
DSI0_TE
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +2590 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
2574
2575 static bool gen11_dsi_configure_te(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
2576 struct drm_display_mode *mode, bool enable)
2577 {
2578 enum port port;
2579 u32 tmp;
2580
2581 if (!(mode->private_flags &
2582 (I915_MODE_FLAG_DSI_USE_TE1 | I915_MODE_FLAG_DSI_USE_TE0)))
2583 return false;
2584
2585 if (mode->private_flags & I915_MODE_FLAG_DSI_USE_TE1)
2586 port = PORT_B;
2587 else
2588 port = PORT_A;
2589
> 2590 tmp = I915_READ(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port));
2591 if (enable)
> 2592 tmp &= ~DSI_TE_EVENT;
2593 else
2594 tmp |= DSI_TE_EVENT;
2595
> 2596 I915_WRITE(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port), tmp);
2597 return true;
2598 }
2599
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 28187 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Cc: jani.nikula@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [V3 6/8] drm/i915/dsi: Configure TE interrupt for cmd mode
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 04:23:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201911200436.S9npEYVh%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191119202330.OuoZbcorZ1if88G3zhk1UN3nGMkbxggFb-vyyGL10xY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119123316.5094-7-vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6485 bytes --]
Hi Vandita,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc8 next-20191118]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vandita-Kulkarni/Add-support-for-mipi-dsi-cmd-mode/20191120-015713
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
config: i386-defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-14) 7.4.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:46:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:39:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c: In function 'gen11_dsi_configure_te':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2590:19: error: implicit declaration of function 'DSI_INTR_MASK_REG'; did you mean 'TSFS_INTR_MASK'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
tmp = I915_READ(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port));
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1979:45: note: in definition of macro '__I915_REG_OP'
intel_uncore_##op__(&(dev_priv__)->uncore, __VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2590:9: note: in expansion of macro 'I915_READ'
tmp = I915_READ(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port));
^~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1981:57: error: incompatible type for argument 2 of 'intel_uncore_read'
#define I915_READ(reg__) __I915_REG_OP(read, dev_priv, (reg__))
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1979:45: note: in definition of macro '__I915_REG_OP'
intel_uncore_##op__(&(dev_priv__)->uncore, __VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2590:9: note: in expansion of macro 'I915_READ'
tmp = I915_READ(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port));
^~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h:9:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h:9,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h:16,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:81,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:46,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:39:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:287:22: note: expected 'i915_reg_t {aka struct <anonymous>}' but argument is of type 'int'
static inline u##x__ intel_uncore_##name__(struct intel_uncore *uncore, \
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:302:1: note: in expansion of macro '__uncore_read'
__uncore_read(read, 32, l, true)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2592:11: error: 'DSI_TE_EVENT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'DEFINE_EVENT'?
tmp &= ~DSI_TE_EVENT;
^~~~~~~~~~~~
DEFINE_EVENT
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2592:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:46:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:39:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1982:65: error: incompatible type for argument 2 of 'intel_uncore_write'
#define I915_WRITE(reg__, val__) __I915_REG_OP(write, dev_priv, (reg__), (val__))
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1979:45: note: in definition of macro '__I915_REG_OP'
intel_uncore_##op__(&(dev_priv__)->uncore, __VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2596:2: note: in expansion of macro 'I915_WRITE'
I915_WRITE(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port), tmp);
^~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h:9:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h:9,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h:16,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:81,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:46,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:39:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:294:20: note: expected 'i915_reg_t {aka struct <anonymous>}' but argument is of type 'int'
static inline void intel_uncore_##name__(struct intel_uncore *uncore, \
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:308:1: note: in expansion of macro '__uncore_write'
__uncore_write(write, 32, l, true)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c: In function 'gen8_de_irq_postinstall':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:3401:22: error: 'DSI0_TE' undeclared (first use in this function)
de_port_masked |= DSI0_TE | DSI1_TE;
^~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:3401:32: error: 'DSI1_TE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'DSI0_TE'?
de_port_masked |= DSI0_TE | DSI1_TE;
^~~~~~~
DSI0_TE
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +2590 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
2574
2575 static bool gen11_dsi_configure_te(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
2576 struct drm_display_mode *mode, bool enable)
2577 {
2578 enum port port;
2579 u32 tmp;
2580
2581 if (!(mode->private_flags &
2582 (I915_MODE_FLAG_DSI_USE_TE1 | I915_MODE_FLAG_DSI_USE_TE0)))
2583 return false;
2584
2585 if (mode->private_flags & I915_MODE_FLAG_DSI_USE_TE1)
2586 port = PORT_B;
2587 else
2588 port = PORT_A;
2589
> 2590 tmp = I915_READ(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port));
2591 if (enable)
> 2592 tmp &= ~DSI_TE_EVENT;
2593 else
2594 tmp |= DSI_TE_EVENT;
2595
> 2596 I915_WRITE(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port), tmp);
2597 return true;
2598 }
2599
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 28187 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [V3 6/8] drm/i915/dsi: Configure TE interrupt for cmd mode
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 04:23:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201911200436.S9npEYVh%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191119123316.5094-7-vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6613 bytes --]
Hi Vandita,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc8 next-20191118]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vandita-Kulkarni/Add-support-for-mipi-dsi-cmd-mode/20191120-015713
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
config: i386-defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-14) 7.4.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:46:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:39:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c: In function 'gen11_dsi_configure_te':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2590:19: error: implicit declaration of function 'DSI_INTR_MASK_REG'; did you mean 'TSFS_INTR_MASK'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
tmp = I915_READ(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port));
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1979:45: note: in definition of macro '__I915_REG_OP'
intel_uncore_##op__(&(dev_priv__)->uncore, __VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2590:9: note: in expansion of macro 'I915_READ'
tmp = I915_READ(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port));
^~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1981:57: error: incompatible type for argument 2 of 'intel_uncore_read'
#define I915_READ(reg__) __I915_REG_OP(read, dev_priv, (reg__))
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1979:45: note: in definition of macro '__I915_REG_OP'
intel_uncore_##op__(&(dev_priv__)->uncore, __VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2590:9: note: in expansion of macro 'I915_READ'
tmp = I915_READ(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port));
^~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h:9:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h:9,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h:16,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:81,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:46,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:39:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:287:22: note: expected 'i915_reg_t {aka struct <anonymous>}' but argument is of type 'int'
static inline u##x__ intel_uncore_##name__(struct intel_uncore *uncore, \
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:302:1: note: in expansion of macro '__uncore_read'
__uncore_read(read, 32, l, true)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2592:11: error: 'DSI_TE_EVENT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'DEFINE_EVENT'?
tmp &= ~DSI_TE_EVENT;
^~~~~~~~~~~~
DEFINE_EVENT
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2592:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:46:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:39:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1982:65: error: incompatible type for argument 2 of 'intel_uncore_write'
#define I915_WRITE(reg__, val__) __I915_REG_OP(write, dev_priv, (reg__), (val__))
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1979:45: note: in definition of macro '__I915_REG_OP'
intel_uncore_##op__(&(dev_priv__)->uncore, __VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:2596:2: note: in expansion of macro 'I915_WRITE'
I915_WRITE(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port), tmp);
^~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h:9:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h:9,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h:16,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:81,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h:46,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:39:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:294:20: note: expected 'i915_reg_t {aka struct <anonymous>}' but argument is of type 'int'
static inline void intel_uncore_##name__(struct intel_uncore *uncore, \
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.h:308:1: note: in expansion of macro '__uncore_write'
__uncore_write(write, 32, l, true)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c: In function 'gen8_de_irq_postinstall':
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:3401:22: error: 'DSI0_TE' undeclared (first use in this function)
de_port_masked |= DSI0_TE | DSI1_TE;
^~~~~~~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c:3401:32: error: 'DSI1_TE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'DSI0_TE'?
de_port_masked |= DSI0_TE | DSI1_TE;
^~~~~~~
DSI0_TE
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +2590 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
2574
2575 static bool gen11_dsi_configure_te(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
2576 struct drm_display_mode *mode, bool enable)
2577 {
2578 enum port port;
2579 u32 tmp;
2580
2581 if (!(mode->private_flags &
2582 (I915_MODE_FLAG_DSI_USE_TE1 | I915_MODE_FLAG_DSI_USE_TE0)))
2583 return false;
2584
2585 if (mode->private_flags & I915_MODE_FLAG_DSI_USE_TE1)
2586 port = PORT_B;
2587 else
2588 port = PORT_A;
2589
> 2590 tmp = I915_READ(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port));
2591 if (enable)
> 2592 tmp &= ~DSI_TE_EVENT;
2593 else
2594 tmp |= DSI_TE_EVENT;
2595
> 2596 I915_WRITE(DSI_INTR_MASK_REG(port), tmp);
2597 return true;
2598 }
2599
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 28187 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-19 12:33 [V3 0/8] Add support for mipi dsi cmd mode Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [V3 1/8] drm/i915/dsi: Configure transcoder operation for command mode Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 19:40 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 19:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 19:40 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [V3 2/8] drm/i915/dsi: Add vblank calculation " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [V3 3/8] drm/i915/dsi: Add cmd mode flags in display mode private flags Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [V3 4/8] drm/i915/dsi: Add check for periodic command mode Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 20:05 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 20:05 ` [Intel-gfx] " kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 20:05 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [V3 5/8] drm/i915/dsi: Use private flags to indicate TE in cmd mode Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [V3 6/8] drm/i915/dsi: Configure TE interrupt for " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 20:23 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2019-11-19 20:23 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 20:23 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [V3 7/8] drm/i915/dsi: Add TE handler for dsi " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 21:00 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 21:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 21:00 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [V3 8/8] drm/i915/dsi: Initiate fame request in " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 12:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vandita Kulkarni
2019-11-19 21:30 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 21:30 ` [Intel-gfx] " kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 21:30 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-19 13:09 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Add support for mipi dsi cmd mode (rev2) Patchwork
2019-11-19 13:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-19 13:12 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-11-19 13:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-19 13:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-11-19 13:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
2019-11-19 19:12 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-11-19 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201911200436.S9npEYVh%lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=vandita.kulkarni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.