All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] xfstests: test adding filesystem-level fscrypt key via key_id
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 22:46:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191127204622.GB12520@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191127204536.GA12520@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:45:36PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 02:31:27PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > This series adds a test which tests adding a key to a filesystem's
> > fscrypt keyring via an "fscrypt-provisioning" keyring key.  This is an
> > alternative to the normal method where the raw key is given directly.
> > 
> > I'm sending this out for comment, but it shouldn't be merged until the
> > corresponding kernel patch has reached mainline.  For more details, see
> > the kernel patch:
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/20191119222447.226853-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/T/#u
> > 
> > This test depends on an xfs_io patch which adds the '-k' option to the
> > 'add_enckey' command, e.g.:
> > 
> > 	xfs_io -c "add_enckey -k KEY_ID" MOUNTPOINT
> > 
> > This test is skipped if the needed kernel or xfs_io support is absent.
> > 
> > This has been tested on ext4, f2fs, and ubifs.
> > 
> > To apply cleanly, my other xfstests patch series
> > "[RFC PATCH 0/5] xfstests: verify ciphertext of IV_INO_LBLK_64 encryption policies"
> > must be applied first.
> > 
> > This series can also be retrieved from
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/xfstests-dev.git
> > tag "fscrypt-provisioning_2019-11-19".
> > 
> > Eric Biggers (3):
> >   common/rc: handle option with argument in _require_xfs_io_command()
> >   common/encrypt: move constant test key to common code
> >   generic: test adding filesystem-level fscrypt key via key_id
> > 
> >  common/encrypt        |  95 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  common/rc             |   2 +-
> >  tests/generic/580     |  17 ++---
> >  tests/generic/806     | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tests/generic/806.out |  73 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tests/generic/group   |   1 +
> >  6 files changed, 316 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 tests/generic/806
> >  create mode 100644 tests/generic/806.out
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.24.0.432.g9d3f5f5b63-goog
> > 
> 
> I'm newbie with fscrypt so I started by encrypting a directory without
> the new feature
> 
> sudo tune2fs -O encrypt /dev/sda2
> sudo fscrypt setup /
> fscrypt encrypt foo
> 
> Worked.
> 
> Generally speaking I'd appreciate a usage example like here to the
> commit message:
> 
> https://lwn.net/Articles/692514/
> 
> Is this doable?
> 
> I might consider trying out the XFS test suite some day but right now it
> would be first nice to smoke test the feature quickly.
> 
> I think for this patch that would actually be mostly sufficient testing.

Sorry, this was meant for the kernel patch :-/

/Jarkko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] xfstests: test adding filesystem-level fscrypt key via key_id
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:46:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191127204622.GB12520@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191127204536.GA12520@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:45:36PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 02:31:27PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > This series adds a test which tests adding a key to a filesystem's
> > fscrypt keyring via an "fscrypt-provisioning" keyring key.  This is an
> > alternative to the normal method where the raw key is given directly.
> > 
> > I'm sending this out for comment, but it shouldn't be merged until the
> > corresponding kernel patch has reached mainline.  For more details, see
> > the kernel patch:
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/20191119222447.226853-1-ebiggers@kernel.org/T/#u
> > 
> > This test depends on an xfs_io patch which adds the '-k' option to the
> > 'add_enckey' command, e.g.:
> > 
> > 	xfs_io -c "add_enckey -k KEY_ID" MOUNTPOINT
> > 
> > This test is skipped if the needed kernel or xfs_io support is absent.
> > 
> > This has been tested on ext4, f2fs, and ubifs.
> > 
> > To apply cleanly, my other xfstests patch series
> > "[RFC PATCH 0/5] xfstests: verify ciphertext of IV_INO_LBLK_64 encryption policies"
> > must be applied first.
> > 
> > This series can also be retrieved from
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/xfstests-dev.git
> > tag "fscrypt-provisioning_2019-11-19".
> > 
> > Eric Biggers (3):
> >   common/rc: handle option with argument in _require_xfs_io_command()
> >   common/encrypt: move constant test key to common code
> >   generic: test adding filesystem-level fscrypt key via key_id
> > 
> >  common/encrypt        |  95 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  common/rc             |   2 +-
> >  tests/generic/580     |  17 ++---
> >  tests/generic/806     | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tests/generic/806.out |  73 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tests/generic/group   |   1 +
> >  6 files changed, 316 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 tests/generic/806
> >  create mode 100644 tests/generic/806.out
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.24.0.432.g9d3f5f5b63-goog
> > 
> 
> I'm newbie with fscrypt so I started by encrypting a directory without
> the new feature
> 
> sudo tune2fs -O encrypt /dev/sda2
> sudo fscrypt setup /
> fscrypt encrypt foo
> 
> Worked.
> 
> Generally speaking I'd appreciate a usage example like here to the
> commit message:
> 
> https://lwn.net/Articles/692514/
> 
> Is this doable?
> 
> I might consider trying out the XFS test suite some day but right now it
> would be first nice to smoke test the feature quickly.
> 
> I think for this patch that would actually be mostly sufficient testing.

Sorry, this was meant for the kernel patch :-/

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-27 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-19 22:31 [RFC PATCH 0/3] xfstests: test adding filesystem-level fscrypt key via key_id Eric Biggers
2019-11-19 22:31 ` Eric Biggers
2019-11-19 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] common/rc: handle option with argument in _require_xfs_io_command() Eric Biggers
2019-11-19 22:31   ` Eric Biggers
2019-11-19 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] common/encrypt: move constant test key to common code Eric Biggers
2019-11-19 22:31   ` Eric Biggers
2019-11-19 22:31 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] generic: test adding filesystem-level fscrypt key via key_id Eric Biggers
2019-11-19 22:31   ` Eric Biggers
2019-11-21  0:25   ` Eric Biggers
2019-11-21  0:25     ` Eric Biggers
2019-11-27 20:45 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] xfstests: " Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-11-27 20:45   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-11-27 20:46   ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2019-11-27 20:46     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-11-27 22:57   ` Eric Biggers
2019-11-27 22:57     ` Eric Biggers
2019-12-11  9:50     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-12-11  9:50       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-12-11 18:00       ` Eric Biggers
2019-12-11 18:00         ` Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191127204622.GB12520@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.