From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, ramalingm.c@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Intercept Aksv writes in the aux hooks
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 21:32:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191205193224.GJ1208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203173638.94919-3-sean@poorly.run>
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 12:36:25PM -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
> From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
>
> Instead of hand rolling the transfer ourselves in the hdcp hook, inspect
> aux messages and add the aksv flag in the aux transfer hook.
>
> IIRC, this was the original implementation and folks wanted this hack to
> be isolated to the hdcp code, which makes sense.
>
> However in testing an LG monitor on my desk, I noticed it was passing
> back a DEFER reply. This wasn't handled in our hand-rolled code and HDCP
> auth was failing as a result. Instead of copy/pasting all of the retry
> logic and delays from drm dp helpers, let's just use the helpers and hide
> the aksv select as best as we can.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 64 ++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index d958e789ab96..7a407c651fb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1515,12 +1515,29 @@ intel_dp_aux_header(u8 txbuf[HEADER_SIZE],
> txbuf[3] = msg->size - 1;
> }
>
> +static u32 intel_dp_aux_generate_xfer_flags(struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
^
const
"_generate_" seems a bit redundant.
> +{
> + if ((msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT) != DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * If we're trying to send the HDCP Aksv, we need to set a the Aksv
> + * select bit to inform the hardware to send the Aksv after our header
> + * since we can't access that data from software.
> + */
> + if (msg->address == DP_AUX_HDCP_AKSV)
> + return DP_AUX_CH_CTL_AUX_AKSV_SELECT;
if (DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE &&
DP_AUX_HDCP_AKSV)
return ...;
would be a little more clear to me since the two things are related here.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t
> intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> {
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = container_of(aux, struct intel_dp, aux);
> u8 txbuf[20], rxbuf[20];
> size_t txsize, rxsize;
> + u32 flags = intel_dp_aux_generate_xfer_flags(msg);
> int ret;
>
> intel_dp_aux_header(txbuf, msg);
> @@ -1541,7 +1558,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> memcpy(txbuf + HEADER_SIZE, msg->buffer, msg->size);
>
> ret = intel_dp_aux_xfer(intel_dp, txbuf, txsize,
> - rxbuf, rxsize, 0);
> + rxbuf, rxsize, flags);
> if (ret > 0) {
> msg->reply = rxbuf[0] >> 4;
>
> @@ -1564,7 +1581,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> return -E2BIG;
>
> ret = intel_dp_aux_xfer(intel_dp, txbuf, txsize,
> - rxbuf, rxsize, 0);
> + rxbuf, rxsize, flags);
> if (ret > 0) {
> msg->reply = rxbuf[0] >> 4;
> /*
> @@ -5858,17 +5875,9 @@ static
> int intel_dp_hdcp_write_an_aksv(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> u8 *an)
> {
> - struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(&intel_dig_port->base.base);
> - static const struct drm_dp_aux_msg msg = {
> - .request = DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE,
> - .address = DP_AUX_HDCP_AKSV,
> - .size = DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN,
> - };
> - u8 txbuf[HEADER_SIZE + DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN] = {}, rxbuf[2], reply = 0;
> + u8 txbuf[DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN] = {};
s/txbuf/ksv/ or something maybe?
Looks reasonable to me
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ssize_t dpcd_ret;
> - int ret;
>
> - /* Output An first, that's easy */
> dpcd_ret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dig_port->dp.aux, DP_AUX_HDCP_AN,
> an, DRM_HDCP_AN_LEN);
> if (dpcd_ret != DRM_HDCP_AN_LEN) {
> @@ -5878,29 +5887,18 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp_write_an_aksv(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> }
>
> /*
> - * Since Aksv is Oh-So-Secret, we can't access it in software. So in
> - * order to get it on the wire, we need to create the AUX header as if
> - * we were writing the data, and then tickle the hardware to output the
> - * data once the header is sent out.
> + * Since Aksv is Oh-So-Secret, we can't access it in software. So we
> + * send an empty buffer of the correct length through the DP helpers. On
> + * the other side, in the transfer hook, we'll generate a flag based on
> + * the destination address which will tickle the hardware to output the
> + * Aksv on our behalf after the header is sent.
> */
> - intel_dp_aux_header(txbuf, &msg);
> -
> - ret = intel_dp_aux_xfer(intel_dp, txbuf, HEADER_SIZE + msg.size,
> - rxbuf, sizeof(rxbuf),
> - DP_AUX_CH_CTL_AUX_AKSV_SELECT);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Write Aksv over DP/AUX failed (%d)\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> - } else if (ret == 0) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Aksv write over DP/AUX was empty\n");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> - reply = (rxbuf[0] >> 4) & DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_MASK;
> - if (reply != DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_ACK) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Aksv write: no DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_ACK %x\n",
> - reply);
> - return -EIO;
> + dpcd_ret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dig_port->dp.aux, DP_AUX_HDCP_AKSV,
> + txbuf, DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN);
> + if (dpcd_ret != DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to write Aksv over DP/AUX (%zd)\n",
> + dpcd_ret);
> + return dpcd_ret >= 0 ? -EIO : dpcd_ret;
> }
> return 0;
> }
> --
> Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, ramalingm.c@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Intercept Aksv writes in the aux hooks
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 21:32:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191205193224.GJ1208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203173638.94919-3-sean@poorly.run>
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 12:36:25PM -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
> From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
>
> Instead of hand rolling the transfer ourselves in the hdcp hook, inspect
> aux messages and add the aksv flag in the aux transfer hook.
>
> IIRC, this was the original implementation and folks wanted this hack to
> be isolated to the hdcp code, which makes sense.
>
> However in testing an LG monitor on my desk, I noticed it was passing
> back a DEFER reply. This wasn't handled in our hand-rolled code and HDCP
> auth was failing as a result. Instead of copy/pasting all of the retry
> logic and delays from drm dp helpers, let's just use the helpers and hide
> the aksv select as best as we can.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 64 ++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index d958e789ab96..7a407c651fb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1515,12 +1515,29 @@ intel_dp_aux_header(u8 txbuf[HEADER_SIZE],
> txbuf[3] = msg->size - 1;
> }
>
> +static u32 intel_dp_aux_generate_xfer_flags(struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
^
const
"_generate_" seems a bit redundant.
> +{
> + if ((msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT) != DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * If we're trying to send the HDCP Aksv, we need to set a the Aksv
> + * select bit to inform the hardware to send the Aksv after our header
> + * since we can't access that data from software.
> + */
> + if (msg->address == DP_AUX_HDCP_AKSV)
> + return DP_AUX_CH_CTL_AUX_AKSV_SELECT;
if (DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE &&
DP_AUX_HDCP_AKSV)
return ...;
would be a little more clear to me since the two things are related here.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t
> intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> {
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = container_of(aux, struct intel_dp, aux);
> u8 txbuf[20], rxbuf[20];
> size_t txsize, rxsize;
> + u32 flags = intel_dp_aux_generate_xfer_flags(msg);
> int ret;
>
> intel_dp_aux_header(txbuf, msg);
> @@ -1541,7 +1558,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> memcpy(txbuf + HEADER_SIZE, msg->buffer, msg->size);
>
> ret = intel_dp_aux_xfer(intel_dp, txbuf, txsize,
> - rxbuf, rxsize, 0);
> + rxbuf, rxsize, flags);
> if (ret > 0) {
> msg->reply = rxbuf[0] >> 4;
>
> @@ -1564,7 +1581,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> return -E2BIG;
>
> ret = intel_dp_aux_xfer(intel_dp, txbuf, txsize,
> - rxbuf, rxsize, 0);
> + rxbuf, rxsize, flags);
> if (ret > 0) {
> msg->reply = rxbuf[0] >> 4;
> /*
> @@ -5858,17 +5875,9 @@ static
> int intel_dp_hdcp_write_an_aksv(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> u8 *an)
> {
> - struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(&intel_dig_port->base.base);
> - static const struct drm_dp_aux_msg msg = {
> - .request = DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE,
> - .address = DP_AUX_HDCP_AKSV,
> - .size = DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN,
> - };
> - u8 txbuf[HEADER_SIZE + DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN] = {}, rxbuf[2], reply = 0;
> + u8 txbuf[DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN] = {};
s/txbuf/ksv/ or something maybe?
Looks reasonable to me
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ssize_t dpcd_ret;
> - int ret;
>
> - /* Output An first, that's easy */
> dpcd_ret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dig_port->dp.aux, DP_AUX_HDCP_AN,
> an, DRM_HDCP_AN_LEN);
> if (dpcd_ret != DRM_HDCP_AN_LEN) {
> @@ -5878,29 +5887,18 @@ int intel_dp_hdcp_write_an_aksv(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> }
>
> /*
> - * Since Aksv is Oh-So-Secret, we can't access it in software. So in
> - * order to get it on the wire, we need to create the AUX header as if
> - * we were writing the data, and then tickle the hardware to output the
> - * data once the header is sent out.
> + * Since Aksv is Oh-So-Secret, we can't access it in software. So we
> + * send an empty buffer of the correct length through the DP helpers. On
> + * the other side, in the transfer hook, we'll generate a flag based on
> + * the destination address which will tickle the hardware to output the
> + * Aksv on our behalf after the header is sent.
> */
> - intel_dp_aux_header(txbuf, &msg);
> -
> - ret = intel_dp_aux_xfer(intel_dp, txbuf, HEADER_SIZE + msg.size,
> - rxbuf, sizeof(rxbuf),
> - DP_AUX_CH_CTL_AUX_AKSV_SELECT);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Write Aksv over DP/AUX failed (%d)\n", ret);
> - return ret;
> - } else if (ret == 0) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Aksv write over DP/AUX was empty\n");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> - reply = (rxbuf[0] >> 4) & DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_MASK;
> - if (reply != DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_ACK) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Aksv write: no DP_AUX_NATIVE_REPLY_ACK %x\n",
> - reply);
> - return -EIO;
> + dpcd_ret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dig_port->dp.aux, DP_AUX_HDCP_AKSV,
> + txbuf, DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN);
> + if (dpcd_ret != DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to write Aksv over DP/AUX (%zd)\n",
> + dpcd_ret);
> + return dpcd_ret >= 0 ? -EIO : dpcd_ret;
> }
> return 0;
> }
> --
> Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-05 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-03 17:36 [PATCH 00/11] drm/i915: Add support for HDCP 1.4 over MST connectors Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Fix sha_text population code Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-04 1:05 ` Sasha Levin
2019-12-04 1:05 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sasha Levin
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Intercept Aksv writes in the aux hooks Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-05 19:32 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2019-12-05 19:32 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Disable HDCP signalling on transcoder disable Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-05 19:33 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-05 19:33 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-06 13:55 ` Sean Paul
2019-12-06 13:55 ` Sean Paul
2019-12-09 15:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-09 15:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-09 16:13 ` Sean Paul
2019-12-09 16:13 ` Sean Paul
2019-12-10 10:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-12-10 10:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Don't WARN on HDCP toggle if get_hw_state returns false Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-05 19:39 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-05 19:39 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-06 13:52 ` Sean Paul
2019-12-06 13:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-09 15:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-09 15:21 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-09 16:16 ` Sean Paul
2019-12-09 16:16 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-09 17:22 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-09 17:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Change toggle_signalling() argument to connector Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-05 19:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-05 19:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: Factor out hdcp->value assignments Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: Don't fully disable HDCP on a port if multiple pipes are using it Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: Support DP MST in enc_to_dig_port() function Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Use ddi_update_pipe in intel_dp_mst Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: Expose HDCP shim functions from dp for use by dp_mst Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Add HDCP 1.4 support for MST connectors Sean Paul
2019-12-03 17:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Sean Paul
2019-12-03 20:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Add support for HDCP 1.4 over " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191205193224.GJ1208@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ramalingm.c@intel.com \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.