All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Delete timespec64_trunc()
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 06:02:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191207060201.GN4203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABeXuvpkYQbsvGTuktEAR8ptr478peet3EH=RD0v+nK5o2Wmjg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 06:43:26PM -0800, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 9:20 PM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This series aims at deleting timespec64_trunc().
> > There is a new api: timestamp_truncate() that is the
> > replacement api. The api additionally does a limits
> > check on the filesystem timestamps.
> 
> Al/Andrew, can one of you help merge these patches?

Looks sane.  Could you check if #misc.timestamp looks sane to you?

One thing that leaves me scratching head is kernfs - surely we
are _not_ limited by any external layouts there, so why do we
need to bother with truncation?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: CIFS <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>,
	Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Delete timespec64_trunc()
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 06:02:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191207060201.GN4203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABeXuvpkYQbsvGTuktEAR8ptr478peet3EH=RD0v+nK5o2Wmjg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 06:43:26PM -0800, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 9:20 PM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This series aims at deleting timespec64_trunc().
> > There is a new api: timestamp_truncate() that is the
> > replacement api. The api additionally does a limits
> > check on the filesystem timestamps.
> 
> Al/Andrew, can one of you help merge these patches?

Looks sane.  Could you check if #misc.timestamp looks sane to you?

One thing that leaves me scratching head is kernfs - surely we
are _not_ limited by any external layouts there, so why do we
need to bother with truncation?

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-07  6:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-03  5:19 [PATCH v2 0/6] Delete timespec64_trunc() Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-03  5:19 ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-03  5:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] fs: fat: Eliminate timespec64_trunc() usage Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-03  5:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] fs: cifs: Delete usage of timespec64_trunc Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-03  5:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] fs: ceph: Delete timespec64_trunc() usage Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-03 18:55   ` Jeff Layton
2019-12-03 19:41     ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-03 19:49       ` Jeff Layton
2019-12-03  5:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] fs: ubifs: Eliminate " Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-03  5:19   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-03  5:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] fs: Delete timespec64_trunc() Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-03  5:19 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] fs: Do not overload update_time Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-06  2:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Delete timespec64_trunc() Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-06  2:43   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-07  6:02   ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-12-07  6:02     ` Al Viro
2019-12-08  2:04     ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-08  2:04       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-12-08  3:04       ` Al Viro
2019-12-08  3:04         ` Al Viro
2019-12-09  0:48         ` Al Viro
2019-12-09  0:48           ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191207060201.GN4203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=stfrench@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.