Re: [PATCH v3 06/13] hw/arm/raspi: Trivial code movement

[Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>]

On Sat,  8 Feb 2020 17:56:38 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:

> There is no point in creating the SoC object before allocating the RAM.
> Move the call to keep all the SoC-related calls together.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>

> ---
>  hw/arm/raspi.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/raspi.c b/hw/arm/raspi.c
> index 7a2ca97347..b3e6f72b55 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/raspi.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/raspi.c
> @@ -227,9 +227,6 @@ static void raspi_init(MachineState *machine, uint32_t board_rev)
>          exit(1);
>      }
>  
> -    object_initialize_child(OBJECT(machine), "soc", &s->soc, sizeof(s->soc),
> -                            board_soc_type(board_rev), &error_abort, NULL);
> -
>      /* Allocate and map RAM */
>      memory_region_allocate_system_memory(&s->ram, OBJECT(machine), "ram",
>                                           machine->ram_size);
> @@ -237,6 +234,8 @@ static void raspi_init(MachineState *machine, uint32_t board_rev)
>      memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(get_system_memory(), 0, &s->ram, 0);
>  
>      /* Setup the SOC */
> +    object_initialize_child(OBJECT(machine), "soc", &s->soc, sizeof(s->soc),
> +                            board_soc_type(board_rev), &error_abort, NULL);
>      object_property_add_const_link(OBJECT(&s->soc), "ram", OBJECT(&s->ram),
>                                     &error_abort);
>      object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&s->soc), board_rev, "board-rev",