From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: renesas: rcar-gen3: Add reset control properties for display
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 18:06:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200219160640.GY5070@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUjVqC=AsNjO1icMyNRrdeMVed_HxMzn6HY=fRt+LvUwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 04:55:52PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:33 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 02:30:18PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Add reset control properties to the device nodes for the Display Units
> > > on all supported R-Car Gen3 SoCs. Note that on these SoCs, there is
> > > only a single reset for each pair of DU channels.
> > >
> > > The display nodes on R-Car V3M and V3H already had "resets" properties,
> > > but lacked the corresponding "reset-names" properties.
> > >
> > > Join the clocks lines while at it, to increase uniformity.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> > > @@ -2503,10 +2503,11 @@
> > > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 256 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > > <GIC_SPI 268 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > > <GIC_SPI 270 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > - clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 724>,
> > > - <&cpg CPG_MOD 723>,
> > > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 724>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 723>,
> > > <&cpg CPG_MOD 721>;
> > > clock-names = "du.0", "du.1", "du.3";
> > > + resets = <&cpg 724>, <&cpg 722>;
> > > + reset-names = "du.0", "du.3";
> >
> > I wonder if this should be du.2, especially given that 722 corresponds
> > to the non-existing DU2 channel. It's a bit of a mess at the hardware
>
> Just following the bindings: "du.3" is the lowest channel that is affected
> by the reset.
Yes I was looking at that, and replied to the DT bindings patch. If the
outcome of the discussion there is to keep the bindings as-is, you can
have my
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
for this whole series.
> > level :-S
>
> Note that supporting R-Car H3-N will make your^H^H^H^Hthe rcar-du device
> driver writer's life even more miserable, as suddenly there is no longer
> a DU2, while the single unified Display Unit node prevents the DTS
> writer from not setting the DU2's status to "okay" in the board DTS
> file. But you might look at the ports submode?
This will require a separate compatible string I'm afraid.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: renesas: rcar-gen3: Add reset control properties for display
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 18:06:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200219160640.GY5070@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUjVqC=AsNjO1icMyNRrdeMVed_HxMzn6HY=fRt+LvUwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 04:55:52PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 4:33 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 02:30:18PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Add reset control properties to the device nodes for the Display Units
> > > on all supported R-Car Gen3 SoCs. Note that on these SoCs, there is
> > > only a single reset for each pair of DU channels.
> > >
> > > The display nodes on R-Car V3M and V3H already had "resets" properties,
> > > but lacked the corresponding "reset-names" properties.
> > >
> > > Join the clocks lines while at it, to increase uniformity.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> > > @@ -2503,10 +2503,11 @@
> > > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 256 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > > <GIC_SPI 268 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > > <GIC_SPI 270 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > - clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 724>,
> > > - <&cpg CPG_MOD 723>,
> > > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 724>, <&cpg CPG_MOD 723>,
> > > <&cpg CPG_MOD 721>;
> > > clock-names = "du.0", "du.1", "du.3";
> > > + resets = <&cpg 724>, <&cpg 722>;
> > > + reset-names = "du.0", "du.3";
> >
> > I wonder if this should be du.2, especially given that 722 corresponds
> > to the non-existing DU2 channel. It's a bit of a mess at the hardware
>
> Just following the bindings: "du.3" is the lowest channel that is affected
> by the reset.
Yes I was looking at that, and replied to the DT bindings patch. If the
outcome of the discussion there is to keep the bindings as-is, you can
have my
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
for this whole series.
> > level :-S
>
> Note that supporting R-Car H3-N will make your^H^H^H^Hthe rcar-du device
> driver writer's life even more miserable, as suddenly there is no longer
> a DU2, while the single unified Display Unit node prevents the DTS
> writer from not setting the DU2's status to "okay" in the board DTS
> file. But you might look at the ports submode?
This will require a separate compatible string I'm afraid.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-19 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-18 13:30 [PATCH v2 0/4] arm: dts: renesas: Add reset control properties for display Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-18 13:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: dts: rcar-gen2: " Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-18 13:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-19 10:59 ` Ulrich Hecht
2020-02-19 10:59 ` Ulrich Hecht
2020-02-19 15:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-02-19 15:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-02-19 15:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-19 15:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ARM: dts: rzg1: " Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-18 13:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-19 10:59 ` Ulrich Hecht
2020-02-19 10:59 ` Ulrich Hecht
2020-02-19 15:28 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-02-19 15:28 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-02-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: renesas: rcar-gen3: " Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-18 13:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-19 11:00 ` Ulrich Hecht
2020-02-19 11:00 ` Ulrich Hecht
2020-02-19 15:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-02-19 15:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-02-19 15:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-19 15:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-19 16:06 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2020-02-19 16:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-02-18 13:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: renesas: rzg2: " Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-18 13:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-02-19 11:01 ` Ulrich Hecht
2020-02-19 11:01 ` Ulrich Hecht
2020-02-19 15:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-02-19 15:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200219160640.GY5070@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.