Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] cpuidle: psci: Fixup support for domain idle states being zero

[Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>]

On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 09:35:57PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> The current code intends to allow a PSCI PM domain to have none domain idle
> states defined in DT. However, a few minor things needs to be fixed to make
> this correctly supported, so let's do that.
>
> Reported-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
> Fixes: a65a397f2451 ("cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd")
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
> index 423f03bbeb74..c34b12c4069a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ static int __init psci_pd_parse_state_nodes(struct genpd_power_state *states,
>  	int i, ret;
>  	u32 psci_state, *psci_state_buf;
>
> +	if (!states)
> +		return 0;
> +

Was any issue found ? Or just code inspection ? If states = NULL,
state_count = 0, and I don't see anything blowing up. It may save couple
of extra instruction execution.

>  	for (i = 0; i < state_count; i++) {
>  		ret = psci_dt_parse_state_node(to_of_node(states[i].fwnode),
>  					&psci_state);
> @@ -96,6 +99,9 @@ static void psci_pd_free_states(struct genpd_power_state *states,
>  {
>  	int i;
>
> +	if (!states)
> +		return;
> +

Same here and kfree(NULL) is also valid.

--
Regards,
Sudeep