All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] cpuidle: psci: Split psci_dt_cpu_init_idle()
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:12:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200304121250.GD25004@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200303203559.23995-4-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 09:35:58PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> To make the code a bit more readable, but also to prepare some code to be
> re-used, let's move the OSI specific initialization out of the
> psci_dt_cpu_init_idle() and into a separate function.
>
> Fixes: a65a397f2451 ("cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd")

Not sure if this fixes anything but I am fine to have this if next one is
a real fix.

> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> 	- Adopted suggestions from Stephen to use IS_ERR_OR_NULL and
> 	PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO, which further clarified the code.
>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> index edd7a54ef0d3..bae9140a65a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,29 @@ int __init psci_dt_parse_state_node(struct device_node *np, u32 *state)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> +static int __init psci_dt_cpu_init_topology(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> +					    struct psci_cpuidle_data *data,
> +					    unsigned int state_count, int cpu)
> +{
> +	/* Currently limit the hierarchical topology to be used in OSI mode. */
> +	if (!psci_has_osi_support())
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	data->dev = psci_dt_attach_cpu(cpu);
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->dev))
> +		return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(data->dev);
> +

This is what I was asking to do before this was merged when I meant to drop
if(data->dev) check. So happy to see it :)

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

--
Regards,
Sudeep

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] cpuidle: psci: Split psci_dt_cpu_init_idle()
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:12:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200304121250.GD25004@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200303203559.23995-4-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 09:35:58PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> To make the code a bit more readable, but also to prepare some code to be
> re-used, let's move the OSI specific initialization out of the
> psci_dt_cpu_init_idle() and into a separate function.
>
> Fixes: a65a397f2451 ("cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd")

Not sure if this fixes anything but I am fine to have this if next one is
a real fix.

> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> 	- Adopted suggestions from Stephen to use IS_ERR_OR_NULL and
> 	PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO, which further clarified the code.
>
> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> index edd7a54ef0d3..bae9140a65a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,29 @@ int __init psci_dt_parse_state_node(struct device_node *np, u32 *state)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> +static int __init psci_dt_cpu_init_topology(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> +					    struct psci_cpuidle_data *data,
> +					    unsigned int state_count, int cpu)
> +{
> +	/* Currently limit the hierarchical topology to be used in OSI mode. */
> +	if (!psci_has_osi_support())
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	data->dev = psci_dt_attach_cpu(cpu);
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(data->dev))
> +		return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(data->dev);
> +

This is what I was asking to do before this was merged when I meant to drop
if(data->dev) check. So happy to see it :)

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

--
Regards,
Sudeep

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-04 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-03 20:35 [PATCH v2 0/4] cpuidle: psci: Some fixes when using the hierarchical layout Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] PM / Domains: Allow no domain-idle-states DT property in genpd when parsing Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-04 10:48   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-04 10:48     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-03 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] cpuidle: psci: Fixup support for domain idle states being zero Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-04 10:50   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-04 10:50     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-04 12:17     ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-04 12:17       ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cpuidle: psci: Split psci_dt_cpu_init_idle() Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-04 12:12   ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-03-04 12:12     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-04 12:20     ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-04 12:20       ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] cpuidle: psci: Allow WFI to be the only state for the hierarchical topology Ulf Hansson
2020-03-03 20:35   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-04 12:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-04 12:23     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-05 14:17     ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-05 14:17       ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-05 16:23       ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-05 16:23         ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06  9:28         ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-06  9:28           ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-06 10:04           ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 10:04             ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 10:47             ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 10:47               ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 12:06               ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 12:06                 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 12:32                 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 12:32                   ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 14:23                   ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 14:23                     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 14:44                     ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 14:44                       ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 14:50                       ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 14:50                         ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 15:35                         ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 15:35                           ` Benjamin Gaignard
2020-03-06 15:55                           ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-06 15:55                             ` Sudeep Holla
2020-03-03 22:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] cpuidle: psci: Some fixes when using the hierarchical layout Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-03 22:27   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-09  7:20   ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-09  7:20     ` Ulf Hansson
2020-03-10  8:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-10  8:37       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200304121250.GD25004@bogus \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=ilina@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.