All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] security: keys: trusted: fix TPM2 authorizations
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 19:52:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200306195247.GA11362@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305022744.12492-4-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 06:27:41PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> In TPM 1.2 an authorization was a 20 byte number.  The spec actually
> recommended you to hash variable length passwords and use the sha1
> hash as the authorization.  Because the spec doesn't require this
> hashing, the current authorization for trusted keys is a 40 digit hex
> number.  For TPM 2.0 the spec allows the passing in of variable length
> passwords and passphrases directly, so we should allow that in trusted
> keys for ease of use.  Update the 'blobauth' parameter to take this
> into account, so we can now use plain text passwords for the keys.
> 
> so before
> 
> keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 blobauthõ72d396fae9206628714fb2ce00f72e94f2258f"
> 
> after we will accept both the old hex sha1 form as well as a new
> directly supplied password:
> 
> keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 blobauth=hello keyhandle000001"
> 
> Since a sha1 hex code must be exactly 40 bytes long and a direct
> password must be 20 or less, we use the length as the discriminator
> for which form is input.
> 
> Note this is both and enhancement and a potential bug fix.  The TPM
> 2.0 spec requires us to strip leading zeros, meaning empyty
> authorization is a zero length HMAC whereas we're currently passing in
> 20 bytes of zeros.  A lot of TPMs simply accept this as OK, but the
> Microsoft TPM emulator rejects it with TPM_RC_BAD_AUTH, so this patch
> makes the Microsoft TPM emulator work with trusted keys.
> 
> Fixes: 0fe5480303a1 ("keys, trusted: seal/unseal with TPM 2.0 chips")
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>

/Jarkko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] security: keys: trusted: fix TPM2 authorizations
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 21:52:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200306195247.GA11362@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305022744.12492-4-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 06:27:41PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> In TPM 1.2 an authorization was a 20 byte number.  The spec actually
> recommended you to hash variable length passwords and use the sha1
> hash as the authorization.  Because the spec doesn't require this
> hashing, the current authorization for trusted keys is a 40 digit hex
> number.  For TPM 2.0 the spec allows the passing in of variable length
> passwords and passphrases directly, so we should allow that in trusted
> keys for ease of use.  Update the 'blobauth' parameter to take this
> into account, so we can now use plain text passwords for the keys.
> 
> so before
> 
> keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 blobauth=f572d396fae9206628714fb2ce00f72e94f2258f"
> 
> after we will accept both the old hex sha1 form as well as a new
> directly supplied password:
> 
> keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 blobauth=hello keyhandle=81000001"
> 
> Since a sha1 hex code must be exactly 40 bytes long and a direct
> password must be 20 or less, we use the length as the discriminator
> for which form is input.
> 
> Note this is both and enhancement and a potential bug fix.  The TPM
> 2.0 spec requires us to strip leading zeros, meaning empyty
> authorization is a zero length HMAC whereas we're currently passing in
> 20 bytes of zeros.  A lot of TPMs simply accept this as OK, but the
> Microsoft TPM emulator rejects it with TPM_RC_BAD_AUTH, so this patch
> makes the Microsoft TPM emulator work with trusted keys.
> 
> Fixes: 0fe5480303a1 ("keys, trusted: seal/unseal with TPM 2.0 chips")
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-06 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-05  2:27 [PATCH v7 0/6] TPM 2.0 trusted keys with attached policy James Bottomley
2020-03-05  2:27 ` James Bottomley
2020-03-05  2:27 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] lib: add ASN.1 encoder James Bottomley
2020-03-05  2:27   ` James Bottomley
2020-03-05 16:20   ` James Bottomley
2020-03-05 16:20     ` James Bottomley
2020-03-06 19:10   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-06 19:10     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-05  2:27 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] oid_registry: Add TCG defined OIDS for TPM keys James Bottomley
2020-03-05  2:27   ` James Bottomley
2020-03-05  2:27 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] security: keys: trusted: fix TPM2 authorizations James Bottomley
2020-03-05  2:27   ` James Bottomley
2020-03-06 19:52   ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2020-03-06 19:52     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-05  2:27 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] security: keys: trusted: use ASN.1 TPM2 key format for the blobs James Bottomley
2020-03-05  2:27   ` James Bottomley
2020-03-06 20:03   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-06 20:03     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-07 22:00   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-07 22:00     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-03-09 13:59     ` James Bottomley
2020-03-09 13:59       ` James Bottomley
2020-03-09 22:08       ` James Bottomley
2020-03-09 22:08         ` James Bottomley
2020-03-05  2:27 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] security: keys: trusted: add ability to specify arbitrary policy James Bottomley
2020-03-05  2:27   ` James Bottomley
2020-03-05  2:27 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] security: keys: trusted: implement counter/timer policy James Bottomley
2020-03-05  2:27   ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200306195247.GA11362@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.