From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/5] f2fs: change default compression algorithm
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:07:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200311030741.GA119277@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d8384b9-88fe-2a15-13ff-238d9fd4027a@huawei.com>
On 03/11, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/3/11 0:15, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 08:50:05PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Use LZ4 as default compression algorithm, as compared to LZO, it shows
> >> almost the same compression ratio and much better decompression speed.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/f2fs/super.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> >> index db3a63f7c769..ebffe7aa08ee 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> >> @@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ static void default_options(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).test_dummy_encryption = false;
> >> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_resuid = make_kuid(&init_user_ns, F2FS_DEF_RESUID);
> >> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_resgid = make_kgid(&init_user_ns, F2FS_DEF_RESGID);
> >> - F2FS_OPTION(sbi).compress_algorithm = COMPRESS_LZO;
> >> + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).compress_algorithm = COMPRESS_LZ4;
> >> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).compress_log_size = MIN_COMPRESS_LOG_SIZE;
> >> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).compress_ext_cnt = 0;
> >> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).bggc_mode = BGGC_MODE_ON;
> >
> > This makes sense, but it's unclear to me why comparing the different compression
> > algorithms is happening just now, after support for both LZO and LZ4 was already
> > merged into mainline and now has to be supported forever. During review months
> > ago, multiple people suggested that LZ4 is better than LZO, so there's not much
> > reason to support LZO at all.
>
> Agreed,
>
> Jaegeuk, thoughts?
Supporting LZO or whatever algorithms looks fine to me as long as kernel
supports without huge maintenance effort. I think it'd be good to provide
a way for users to compare several algorithms in whatever their ways.
And, unfortunately, I don't think we can remove LZO at this point, even for -rc.
Thanks,
>
> Let me remove lzo if you have no objection on this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > - Eric
> > .
> >
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/5] f2fs: change default compression algorithm
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:07:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200311030741.GA119277@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d8384b9-88fe-2a15-13ff-238d9fd4027a@huawei.com>
On 03/11, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/3/11 0:15, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 08:50:05PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Use LZ4 as default compression algorithm, as compared to LZO, it shows
> >> almost the same compression ratio and much better decompression speed.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/f2fs/super.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> >> index db3a63f7c769..ebffe7aa08ee 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> >> @@ -1577,7 +1577,7 @@ static void default_options(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).test_dummy_encryption = false;
> >> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_resuid = make_kuid(&init_user_ns, F2FS_DEF_RESUID);
> >> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_resgid = make_kgid(&init_user_ns, F2FS_DEF_RESGID);
> >> - F2FS_OPTION(sbi).compress_algorithm = COMPRESS_LZO;
> >> + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).compress_algorithm = COMPRESS_LZ4;
> >> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).compress_log_size = MIN_COMPRESS_LOG_SIZE;
> >> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).compress_ext_cnt = 0;
> >> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).bggc_mode = BGGC_MODE_ON;
> >
> > This makes sense, but it's unclear to me why comparing the different compression
> > algorithms is happening just now, after support for both LZO and LZ4 was already
> > merged into mainline and now has to be supported forever. During review months
> > ago, multiple people suggested that LZ4 is better than LZO, so there's not much
> > reason to support LZO at all.
>
> Agreed,
>
> Jaegeuk, thoughts?
Supporting LZO or whatever algorithms looks fine to me as long as kernel
supports without huge maintenance effort. I think it'd be good to provide
a way for users to compare several algorithms in whatever their ways.
And, unfortunately, I don't think we can remove LZO at this point, even for -rc.
Thanks,
>
> Let me remove lzo if you have no objection on this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > - Eric
> > .
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-11 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-10 12:50 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/5] f2fs: change default compression algorithm Chao Yu
2020-03-10 12:50 ` Chao Yu
2020-03-10 12:50 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/5] f2fs: force compressed data into warm area Chao Yu
2020-03-10 12:50 ` Chao Yu
2020-03-10 16:32 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-03-10 16:32 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-03-11 3:45 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-03-11 3:45 ` Chao Yu
2020-03-10 12:50 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/5] f2fs: fix to account compressed inode correctly Chao Yu
2020-03-10 12:50 ` Chao Yu
2020-03-10 12:50 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: fix to check dirty pages during compressed inode conversion Chao Yu
2020-03-10 12:50 ` Chao Yu
2020-03-10 12:50 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 5/5] f2fs: allow to clear F2FS_COMPR_FL flag Chao Yu
2020-03-10 12:50 ` Chao Yu
2020-03-10 16:15 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/5] f2fs: change default compression algorithm Eric Biggers
2020-03-10 16:15 ` Eric Biggers
2020-03-11 0:41 ` Chao Yu
2020-03-11 0:41 ` Chao Yu
2020-03-11 3:07 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2020-03-11 3:07 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200311030741.GA119277@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.