From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: masonccyang@mxic.com.tw
Cc: vigneshr@ti.com, bbrezillon@kernel.org, juliensu@mxic.com.tw,
richard@nod.at, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, yuehaibing@huawei.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, frieder.schrempf@kontron.de,
rfontana@redhat.com,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, stefan@agner.ch,
tglx@linutronix.de, allison@lohutok.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support manufacturer specific lock/unlock operation
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:25:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200311082522.53313163@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFCDE22522.001A7410-ON48258528.000E260F-48258528.000EA7E7@mxic.com.tw>
Hi Mason, Boris,
masonccyang@mxic.com.tw wrote on Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:40:04 +0800:
> Hi Boris,
>
> > > Add nand_lock() & nand_unlock() for manufacturer specific lock &
> unlock
> > > operation while the device supports Block Portection function.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
> > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >
> > Reported-by on something that's not a fix doesn't make sense. I know
> > the 0day bot asked you to add this tag, but that should only be done if
> > you submit a separate patch, ideally with a Fixes tag. If the offending
> > patch has not been merged yet, you should just fix the commit and ignore
> > the Reported-by tag (you can mention who reported the problem in the
> > changelog though).
Yesterday when applying all the NAND patches my personal IP address got
flagged as spam by mistake (~500 mails in ~10s) so I could not answer
manually as I wished.
Indeed, this Reported-by tag was not needed and I dropped it manually
when applying. This tag is meant to show an error that was existing
*before* your series and that you are fixing with your series. This is
not something you should add when a robot tells you something is wrong
in your series.
Also, I rewrote several paragraphs and I prefixed two of them with "mtd:
rawnand: macronix:".
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: masonccyang@mxic.com.tw
Cc: "Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
allison@lohutok.net, bbrezillon@kernel.org,
frieder.schrempf@kontron.de, juliensu@mxic.com.tw,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
rfontana@redhat.com, richard@nod.at, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
stefan@agner.ch, tglx@linutronix.de, vigneshr@ti.com,
yuehaibing@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support manufacturer specific lock/unlock operation
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:25:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200311082522.53313163@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFCDE22522.001A7410-ON48258528.000E260F-48258528.000EA7E7@mxic.com.tw>
Hi Mason, Boris,
masonccyang@mxic.com.tw wrote on Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:40:04 +0800:
> Hi Boris,
>
> > > Add nand_lock() & nand_unlock() for manufacturer specific lock &
> unlock
> > > operation while the device supports Block Portection function.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
> > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >
> > Reported-by on something that's not a fix doesn't make sense. I know
> > the 0day bot asked you to add this tag, but that should only be done if
> > you submit a separate patch, ideally with a Fixes tag. If the offending
> > patch has not been merged yet, you should just fix the commit and ignore
> > the Reported-by tag (you can mention who reported the problem in the
> > changelog though).
Yesterday when applying all the NAND patches my personal IP address got
flagged as spam by mistake (~500 mails in ~10s) so I could not answer
manually as I wished.
Indeed, this Reported-by tag was not needed and I dropped it manually
when applying. This tag is meant to show an error that was existing
*before* your series and that you are fixing with your series. This is
not something you should add when a robot tells you something is wrong
in your series.
Also, I rewrote several paragraphs and I prefixed two of them with "mtd:
rawnand: macronix:".
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-11 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-03 7:21 [PATCH v3 0/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support Macronix Block Portection & Deep Power Down mode Mason Yang
2020-03-03 7:21 ` Mason Yang
2020-03-03 7:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support manufacturer specific lock/unlock operation Mason Yang
2020-03-03 7:21 ` Mason Yang
2020-03-10 18:30 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-03-10 18:30 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-03-10 19:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-10 19:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-11 2:40 ` masonccyang
2020-03-11 2:40 ` masonccyang
2020-03-11 7:25 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2020-03-11 7:25 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-03-03 7:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support Macronix Block Protection function Mason Yang
2020-03-03 7:21 ` Mason Yang
2020-03-03 7:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support manufacturer specific suspend/resume operation Mason Yang
2020-03-03 7:21 ` Mason Yang
2020-03-10 18:30 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-03-10 18:30 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-03-10 19:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-10 19:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-11 5:40 ` masonccyang
2020-03-11 5:40 ` masonccyang
2020-03-11 7:43 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-03-11 7:43 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-03-11 7:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-11 7:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-12 1:45 ` masonccyang
2020-03-12 1:45 ` masonccyang
2020-03-10 19:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-10 19:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-10 19:41 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-10 19:41 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-11 6:13 ` masonccyang
2020-03-11 6:13 ` masonccyang
2020-03-11 8:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-11 8:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-03-12 1:48 ` masonccyang
2020-03-12 1:48 ` masonccyang
2020-03-03 7:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support Macronix deep power down mode Mason Yang
2020-03-03 7:21 ` Mason Yang
2020-03-09 13:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support Macronix Block Portection & Deep Power Down mode Miquel Raynal
2020-03-09 13:14 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-03-10 2:30 ` masonccyang
2020-03-10 2:30 ` masonccyang
2020-03-10 7:44 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-03-10 7:44 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200311082522.53313163@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=allison@lohutok.net \
--cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=frieder.schrempf@kontron.de \
--cc=juliensu@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=masonccyang@mxic.com.tw \
--cc=rfontana@redhat.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=stefan@agner.ch \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.