From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
Cc: "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
"Marcel Ziswiler" <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul Cercueil" <paul@crapouillou.net>,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
"Ludovic Desroches" <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Philippe Schenker" <philippe.schenker@toradex.com>,
"Paul Barker" <pbarker@konsulko.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Igor Opaniuk" <igor.opaniuk@toradex.com>,
"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
"Tony Prisk" <linux@prisktech.co.nz>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] pwm: rename the PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED enum
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:40:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200317174043.GA1464607@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200317123231.2843297-2-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 877 bytes --]
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> The polarity enum definition PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED is misspelled.
> Rename it to PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED.
It isn't misspelled. "inversed" is a synonym for "inverted". Both
spellings are correct.
And as you noted in the cover letter, there's a conflict between the
macro defined in dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.txt. If they end up being included
in the wrong order you'll get a compile error.
The enum was named this way on purpose to make it separate from the
definition for the DT bindings. Note that DT bindings are an ABI and can
never change, whereas the enum pwm_polarity is part of a Linux internal
API and doesn't have the same restrictions as an ABI.
As far as I'm concerned this is completely unnecessary churn that's
potentially going to come back and bite us, so I see no reason to accept
this.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul Barker" <pbarker@konsulko.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
"Marcel Ziswiler" <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
"Igor Opaniuk" <igor.opaniuk@toradex.com>,
"Philippe Schenker" <philippe.schenker@toradex.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
"Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Ludovic Desroches" <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] pwm: rename the PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED enum
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:40:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200317174043.GA1464607@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200317123231.2843297-2-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 877 bytes --]
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> The polarity enum definition PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED is misspelled.
> Rename it to PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED.
It isn't misspelled. "inversed" is a synonym for "inverted". Both
spellings are correct.
And as you noted in the cover letter, there's a conflict between the
macro defined in dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.txt. If they end up being included
in the wrong order you'll get a compile error.
The enum was named this way on purpose to make it separate from the
definition for the DT bindings. Note that DT bindings are an ABI and can
never change, whereas the enum pwm_polarity is part of a Linux internal
API and doesn't have the same restrictions as an ABI.
As far as I'm concerned this is completely unnecessary churn that's
potentially going to come back and bite us, so I see no reason to accept
this.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
Cc: "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
"Marcel Ziswiler" <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul Cercueil" <paul@crapouillou.net>,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
"Ludovic Desroches" <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Philippe Schenker" <philippe.schenker@toradex.com>,
"Paul Barker" <pbarker@konsulko.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Igor Opaniuk" <igor.opaniuk@toradex.com>,
"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
"Tony Prisk" <linux@prisktech.co.nz>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] pwm: rename the PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED enum
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:40:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200317174043.GA1464607@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200317123231.2843297-2-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 877 bytes --]
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> The polarity enum definition PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED is misspelled.
> Rename it to PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED.
It isn't misspelled. "inversed" is a synonym for "inverted". Both
spellings are correct.
And as you noted in the cover letter, there's a conflict between the
macro defined in dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.txt. If they end up being included
in the wrong order you'll get a compile error.
The enum was named this way on purpose to make it separate from the
definition for the DT bindings. Note that DT bindings are an ABI and can
never change, whereas the enum pwm_polarity is part of a Linux internal
API and doesn't have the same restrictions as an ABI.
As far as I'm concerned this is completely unnecessary churn that's
potentially going to come back and bite us, so I see no reason to accept
this.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
Cc: "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
"Marcel Ziswiler" <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul Cercueil" <paul@crapouillou.net>,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
"Ludovic Desroches" <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Philippe Schenker" <philippe.schenker@toradex.com>,
"Paul Barker" <pbarker@konsulko.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Igor Opaniuk" <igor.opaniuk@toradex.com>,
"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
"Tony Prisk" <linux@prisktech.co.nz>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] pwm: rename the PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED enum
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:40:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200317174043.GA1464607@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200317123231.2843297-2-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 877 bytes --]
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> The polarity enum definition PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED is misspelled.
> Rename it to PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED.
It isn't misspelled. "inversed" is a synonym for "inverted". Both
spellings are correct.
And as you noted in the cover letter, there's a conflict between the
macro defined in dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.txt. If they end up being included
in the wrong order you'll get a compile error.
The enum was named this way on purpose to make it separate from the
definition for the DT bindings. Note that DT bindings are an ABI and can
never change, whereas the enum pwm_polarity is part of a Linux internal
API and doesn't have the same restrictions as an ABI.
As far as I'm concerned this is completely unnecessary churn that's
potentially going to come back and bite us, so I see no reason to accept
this.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul Barker" <pbarker@konsulko.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
"Marcel Ziswiler" <marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com>,
"Igor Opaniuk" <igor.opaniuk@toradex.com>,
"Philippe Schenker" <philippe.schenker@toradex.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>,
"Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Ludovic Desroches" <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Paul Cercueil" <paul@crapouillou.net>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Ray Jui" <rjui@broadcom.com>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"Tony Prisk" <linux@prisktech.co.nz>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] pwm: rename the PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED enum
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:40:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200317174043.GA1464607@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200317123231.2843297-2-oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 877 bytes --]
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> The polarity enum definition PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED is misspelled.
> Rename it to PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED.
It isn't misspelled. "inversed" is a synonym for "inverted". Both
spellings are correct.
And as you noted in the cover letter, there's a conflict between the
macro defined in dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.txt. If they end up being included
in the wrong order you'll get a compile error.
The enum was named this way on purpose to make it separate from the
definition for the DT bindings. Note that DT bindings are an ABI and can
never change, whereas the enum pwm_polarity is part of a Linux internal
API and doesn't have the same restrictions as an ABI.
As far as I'm concerned this is completely unnecessary churn that's
potentially going to come back and bite us, so I see no reason to accept
this.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-17 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 134+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-17 12:32 [RFC PATCH 0/7] Rework PWM_POLARITY_* flags Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] pwm: rename the PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED enum Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 13:34 ` Paul Barker
2020-03-17 13:34 ` Paul Barker
2020-03-17 13:34 ` Paul Barker
2020-03-17 13:34 ` Paul Barker
2020-03-17 13:34 ` Paul Barker
2020-03-17 21:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-17 21:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-17 21:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-17 21:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-17 21:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-17 16:26 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2020-03-17 16:26 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2020-03-17 16:26 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2020-03-17 16:26 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2020-03-17 16:26 ` Claudiu.Beznea-UWL1GkI3JZL3oGB3hsPCZA
2020-03-17 16:39 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 16:39 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 16:39 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 16:39 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 16:39 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 17:40 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2020-03-17 17:40 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-17 17:40 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-17 17:40 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-17 17:40 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-17 21:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-17 21:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-17 21:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-17 21:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-17 21:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-18 22:59 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-18 22:59 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-18 22:59 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-18 22:59 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-18 22:59 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-19 6:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 6:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 6:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 6:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 6:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 16:37 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-19 16:37 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-19 16:37 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-19 16:37 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-19 16:37 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-19 17:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 17:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 17:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 17:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 17:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 11:40 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-19 11:40 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-19 11:40 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-19 11:40 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-19 11:40 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-19 12:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 12:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 12:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 12:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 12:10 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 12:57 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-19 12:57 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-19 12:57 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-19 12:57 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-19 12:57 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-19 16:44 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-19 16:44 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-19 16:44 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-19 16:44 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-19 16:44 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-18 11:47 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-18 11:47 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-18 11:47 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-18 11:47 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-18 11:47 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: pwm: document the PWM polarity flag Oleksandr Suvorov
[not found] ` <20200317123231.2843297-3-oleksandr.suvorov-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2020-03-17 17:43 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-17 17:43 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-17 21:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-17 21:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-18 23:05 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-19 7:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-19 7:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König
[not found] ` <20200319070510.gc6hr53gn7n2osvb-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2020-03-19 17:04 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-19 17:04 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-30 21:00 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <20200317213056.futfiwn4qgr2njye-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2020-03-18 23:19 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-18 23:19 ` Thierry Reding
2020-03-17 22:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-03-17 12:32 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: pwm: add normal " Oleksandr Suvorov
[not found] ` <20200317123231.2843297-4-oleksandr.suvorov-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2020-03-17 13:36 ` Paul Barker
2020-03-17 13:36 ` Paul Barker
2020-03-17 14:06 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 21:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-17 21:36 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-03-17 22:56 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-03-18 9:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
[not found] ` <20200317123231.2843297-1-oleksandr.suvorov-2KBjVHiyJgBBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2020-03-17 12:32 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] dt-bindings: pwm: add description of PWM polarity Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 23:01 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-03-18 11:37 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-18 12:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
[not found] ` <20200318122942.GA7833-N3hz7ZxfLydczECFQUw77jytWr6r+dGw0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2020-03-18 12:36 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-18 12:36 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] pwm: replace polarity enum with macros Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] arm64: dts: pwm: replace polarity constant with macro Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-20 10:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-03-20 10:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-03-20 10:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-03-20 10:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-03-17 12:32 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] arm: " Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-17 12:32 ` Oleksandr Suvorov
2020-03-20 10:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-03-20 10:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-03-20 10:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-03-20 10:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200317174043.GA1464607@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=igor.opaniuk@toradex.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@prisktech.co.nz \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=pbarker@konsulko.com \
--cc=philippe.schenker@toradex.com \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.