From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
boqun.feng@gmail.com,
"open list:MEDIATEK MT76 WIRELESS LAN DRIVER"
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Roy Luo <royluo@google.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] mt76: remove unnecessary annotations
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 01:19:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200411001933.10072-3-jbi.octave@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200411001933.10072-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Sparse report warnings at mt76_tx_status_unlock() and mt76_tx_status_lock()
warning: context imbalance in mt76_tx_status_lock() - wrong count at exit
warning: context imbalance in mt76_tx_status_unlock() - unexpected unlock
The root cause is the additional __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock)
and __release(&dev->status_list.unlock) called
from inside mt76_tx_status_lock() and mt76_tx_status_unlock().
Remove __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock) annotation
Remove __releases(&dev->status_list.unlock)
Correct &dev->status_list.unlock to &dev->status_list.lock
-unlock not defined in the sk_buff_head struct
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
index 7ee91d946882..7581ba9c2e95 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
@@ -101,18 +101,16 @@ mt76_tx_status_lock(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct sk_buff_head *list)
{
__skb_queue_head_init(list);
spin_lock_bh(&dev->status_list.lock);
- __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt76_tx_status_lock);
void
mt76_tx_status_unlock(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct sk_buff_head *list)
- __releases(&dev->status_list.unlock)
+ __releases(&dev->status_list.lock)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
spin_unlock_bh(&dev->status_list.lock);
- __release(&dev->status_list.unlock);
while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL)
ieee80211_tx_status(dev->hw, skb);
--
2.24.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com, Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>, Roy Luo <royluo@google.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org (open list:MEDIATEK MT76 WIRELESS
LAN DRIVER),
netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS),
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated
list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support),
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/Mediatek
SoC support)
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] mt76: remove unnecessary annotations
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 01:19:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200411001933.10072-3-jbi.octave@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200411001933.10072-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Sparse report warnings at mt76_tx_status_unlock() and mt76_tx_status_lock()
warning: context imbalance in mt76_tx_status_lock() - wrong count at exit
warning: context imbalance in mt76_tx_status_unlock() - unexpected unlock
The root cause is the additional __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock)
and __release(&dev->status_list.unlock) called
from inside mt76_tx_status_lock() and mt76_tx_status_unlock().
Remove __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock) annotation
Remove __releases(&dev->status_list.unlock)
Correct &dev->status_list.unlock to &dev->status_list.lock
-unlock not defined in the sk_buff_head struct
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
index 7ee91d946882..7581ba9c2e95 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
@@ -101,18 +101,16 @@ mt76_tx_status_lock(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct sk_buff_head *list)
{
__skb_queue_head_init(list);
spin_lock_bh(&dev->status_list.lock);
- __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt76_tx_status_lock);
void
mt76_tx_status_unlock(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct sk_buff_head *list)
- __releases(&dev->status_list.unlock)
+ __releases(&dev->status_list.lock)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
spin_unlock_bh(&dev->status_list.lock);
- __release(&dev->status_list.unlock);
while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL)
ieee80211_tx_status(dev->hw, skb);
--
2.24.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>,
"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
boqun.feng@gmail.com,
"open list:MEDIATEK MT76 WIRELESS LAN DRIVER"
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Roy Luo <royluo@google.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] mt76: remove unnecessary annotations
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 01:19:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200411001933.10072-3-jbi.octave@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200411001933.10072-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Sparse report warnings at mt76_tx_status_unlock() and mt76_tx_status_lock()
warning: context imbalance in mt76_tx_status_lock() - wrong count at exit
warning: context imbalance in mt76_tx_status_unlock() - unexpected unlock
The root cause is the additional __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock)
and __release(&dev->status_list.unlock) called
from inside mt76_tx_status_lock() and mt76_tx_status_unlock().
Remove __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock) annotation
Remove __releases(&dev->status_list.unlock)
Correct &dev->status_list.unlock to &dev->status_list.lock
-unlock not defined in the sk_buff_head struct
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
index 7ee91d946882..7581ba9c2e95 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/tx.c
@@ -101,18 +101,16 @@ mt76_tx_status_lock(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct sk_buff_head *list)
{
__skb_queue_head_init(list);
spin_lock_bh(&dev->status_list.lock);
- __acquire(&dev->status_list.lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt76_tx_status_lock);
void
mt76_tx_status_unlock(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct sk_buff_head *list)
- __releases(&dev->status_list.unlock)
+ __releases(&dev->status_list.lock)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
spin_unlock_bh(&dev->status_list.lock);
- __release(&dev->status_list.unlock);
while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(list)) != NULL)
ieee80211_tx_status(dev->hw, skb);
--
2.24.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-11 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <0/9>
2020-04-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 0/9] Lock warning cleanups Jules Irenge
2020-04-11 0:19 ` Jules Irenge
2020-04-11 0:19 ` Jules Irenge
2020-04-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 1/9] dm snapshot: Add missing annotation for dm_exception_table_lock() and dm_exception_table_unlock() Jules Irenge
2020-04-11 0:19 ` Jules Irenge
2020-04-11 0:19 ` Jules Irenge [this message]
2020-04-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 2/9] mt76: remove unnecessary annotations Jules Irenge
2020-04-11 0:19 ` Jules Irenge
2020-04-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 3/9] hostap: Add missing annotations for prism2_bss_list_proc_start() and prism2_bss_list_proc_stop Jules Irenge
2020-04-15 8:42 ` Kalle Valo
2020-04-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 4/9] mac80211: Add missing annotation for brcms_rfkill_set_hw_state() Jules Irenge
2020-04-15 8:44 ` [PATCH 4/9] brcmsmac: " Kalle Valo
2020-04-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 5/9] mac80211: Add missing annotation for brcms_down() Jules Irenge
2020-04-15 8:45 ` [PATCH 5/9] brcmsmac: " Kalle Valo
2020-04-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 6/9] scsi: libsas: Add missing annotation for sas_ata_qc_issue() Jules Irenge
2020-04-14 7:35 ` John Garry
2020-04-15 1:44 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-04-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 7/9] scsi: bnx2fc: Add missing annotation for bnx2fc_abts_cleanup() Jules Irenge
2020-04-24 16:56 ` Martin K. Petersen
2020-04-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 8/9] power: wakeup: Add missing annotation for wakeup_sources_stats_seq_start() and wakeup_sources_stats_seq_stop() Jules Irenge
2020-04-11 0:19 ` [PATCH 9/9] power: wakeup: Add missing annotation for wakeup_sources_read_lock() and wakeup_sources_read_unlock() Jules Irenge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200411001933.10072-3-jbi.octave@gmail.com \
--to=jbi.octave@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=royluo@google.com \
--cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.