All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Cc: yhchuang@realtek.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@gmail.com>,
	Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>,
	Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iopoll: Introduce read_poll_timeout_atomic macro
Date: Wed,  6 May 2020 08:30:08 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200506083008.DE136C44798@smtp.codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200424184918.30360-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>

Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> wrote:

> Like read_poll_timeout, an atomic variant for multiple parameter read
> function can be useful.
> 
> Will be used by a later patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

57a29df34146 iopoll: Introduce read_poll_timeout_atomic macro

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11508809/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

      reply	other threads:[~2020-05-06  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-23  6:38 [PATCH 1/2] iopoll: Introduce read_poll_timeout_atomic macro Kai-Heng Feng
2020-04-23  6:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context Kai-Heng Feng
2020-04-23  6:49   ` Kalle Valo
2020-04-23  6:53     ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-04-23  7:01       ` Kalle Valo
2020-04-23  7:30   ` [PATCH v2 " Kai-Heng Feng
2020-04-23 16:07     ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-06  8:31     ` Kalle Valo
2020-04-23  6:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] iopoll: Introduce read_poll_timeout_atomic macro Kalle Valo
2020-04-23 10:23   ` Mark Brown
2020-04-23 11:27     ` Kalle Valo
2020-04-23 14:47       ` Mark Brown
2020-04-23 15:13         ` Kalle Valo
2020-04-24 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 " Kai-Heng Feng
2020-05-06  8:30   ` Kalle Valo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200506083008.DE136C44798@smtp.codeaurora.org \
    --to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=alexios.zavras@intel.com \
    --cc=allison@lohutok.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yhchuang@realtek.com \
    --cc=zhengdejin5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.