From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Cc: yhchuang@realtek.com, Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list),
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iopoll: Introduce read_poll_timeout_atomic macro
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:47:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lfmmn1fo.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423063811.2636-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> (Kai-Heng Feng's message of "Thu, 23 Apr 2020 14:38:09 +0800")
Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> writes:
> Like read_poll_timeout, an atomic variant for multiple parameter read
> function can be useful.
>
> Will be used by a later patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> ---
> include/linux/iopoll.h | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
I don't know who maintains iopoll.h, at least MAINTAINERS file doesn't
have an entry, so not sure how to handle this patch.
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-23 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-23 6:38 [PATCH 1/2] iopoll: Introduce read_poll_timeout_atomic macro Kai-Heng Feng
2020-04-23 6:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context Kai-Heng Feng
2020-04-23 6:49 ` Kalle Valo
2020-04-23 6:53 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2020-04-23 7:01 ` Kalle Valo
2020-04-23 7:30 ` [PATCH v2 " Kai-Heng Feng
2020-04-23 16:07 ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-06 8:31 ` Kalle Valo
2020-04-23 6:47 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2020-04-23 10:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] iopoll: Introduce read_poll_timeout_atomic macro Mark Brown
2020-04-23 11:27 ` Kalle Valo
2020-04-23 14:47 ` Mark Brown
2020-04-23 15:13 ` Kalle Valo
2020-04-24 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 " Kai-Heng Feng
2020-05-06 8:30 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lfmmn1fo.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alexios.zavras@intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhchuang@realtek.com \
--cc=zhengdejin5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.