From: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer@gmail.com>,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, namhyung@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
yj.chiang@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: perf: Support NMI context for perf event ISR
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 20:48:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200516124857.75004-3-lecopzer@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200516124857.75004-1-lecopzer@gmail.com>
Perf ISR doesn't support for NMI context, thus add some necessary
condition-if to handle NMI context:
- We should not hold pmu_lock since it may have already been acquired
before NMI triggered.
- irq_work should not run at NMI context.
Signed-off-by: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index 4d7879484cec..94b404509f02 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -313,6 +313,23 @@ static inline bool armv8pmu_event_is_chained(struct perf_event *event)
(idx != ARMV8_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER);
}
+/*
+ * NMI Perf interrupts may be triggered during kernel holding
+ * same lock.
+ * Avoid acquiring lock again in NMI context.
+ */
+#define armv8pmu_lock(lock, flags) \
+ do { \
+ if (!in_nmi()) \
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define armv8pmu_unlock(lock, flags) \
+ do { \
+ if (!in_nmi()) \
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);\
+ } while (0)
+
/*
* ARMv8 low level PMU access
*/
@@ -589,7 +606,7 @@ static void armv8pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
* Enable counter and interrupt, and set the counter to count
* the event that we're interested in.
*/
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_lock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
/*
* Disable counter
@@ -611,7 +628,7 @@ static void armv8pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
*/
armv8pmu_enable_event_counter(event);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_unlock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
}
static void armv8pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -623,7 +640,7 @@ static void armv8pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
/*
* Disable counter and interrupt
*/
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_lock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
/*
* Disable counter
@@ -635,7 +652,7 @@ static void armv8pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
*/
armv8pmu_disable_event_irq(event);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_unlock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
}
static void armv8pmu_start(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
@@ -643,10 +660,10 @@ static void armv8pmu_start(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
unsigned long flags;
struct pmu_hw_events *events = this_cpu_ptr(cpu_pmu->hw_events);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_lock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
/* Enable all counters */
armv8pmu_pmcr_write(armv8pmu_pmcr_read() | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_unlock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
}
static void armv8pmu_stop(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
@@ -654,10 +671,10 @@ static void armv8pmu_stop(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
unsigned long flags;
struct pmu_hw_events *events = this_cpu_ptr(cpu_pmu->hw_events);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_lock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
/* Disable all counters */
armv8pmu_pmcr_write(armv8pmu_pmcr_read() & ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_unlock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
}
static irqreturn_t armv8pmu_handle_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
@@ -722,7 +739,8 @@ static irqreturn_t armv8pmu_handle_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
* platforms that can have the PMU interrupts raised as an NMI, this
* will not work.
*/
- irq_work_run();
+ if (!armpmu_support_nmi())
+ irq_work_run();
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer@gmail.com>,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, namhyung@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
yj.chiang@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: perf: Support NMI context for perf event ISR
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 20:48:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200516124857.75004-3-lecopzer@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200516124857.75004-1-lecopzer@gmail.com>
Perf ISR doesn't support for NMI context, thus add some necessary
condition-if to handle NMI context:
- We should not hold pmu_lock since it may have already been acquired
before NMI triggered.
- irq_work should not run at NMI context.
Signed-off-by: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index 4d7879484cec..94b404509f02 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -313,6 +313,23 @@ static inline bool armv8pmu_event_is_chained(struct perf_event *event)
(idx != ARMV8_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER);
}
+/*
+ * NMI Perf interrupts may be triggered during kernel holding
+ * same lock.
+ * Avoid acquiring lock again in NMI context.
+ */
+#define armv8pmu_lock(lock, flags) \
+ do { \
+ if (!in_nmi()) \
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define armv8pmu_unlock(lock, flags) \
+ do { \
+ if (!in_nmi()) \
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);\
+ } while (0)
+
/*
* ARMv8 low level PMU access
*/
@@ -589,7 +606,7 @@ static void armv8pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
* Enable counter and interrupt, and set the counter to count
* the event that we're interested in.
*/
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_lock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
/*
* Disable counter
@@ -611,7 +628,7 @@ static void armv8pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
*/
armv8pmu_enable_event_counter(event);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_unlock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
}
static void armv8pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -623,7 +640,7 @@ static void armv8pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
/*
* Disable counter and interrupt
*/
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_lock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
/*
* Disable counter
@@ -635,7 +652,7 @@ static void armv8pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
*/
armv8pmu_disable_event_irq(event);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_unlock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
}
static void armv8pmu_start(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
@@ -643,10 +660,10 @@ static void armv8pmu_start(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
unsigned long flags;
struct pmu_hw_events *events = this_cpu_ptr(cpu_pmu->hw_events);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_lock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
/* Enable all counters */
armv8pmu_pmcr_write(armv8pmu_pmcr_read() | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_unlock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
}
static void armv8pmu_stop(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
@@ -654,10 +671,10 @@ static void armv8pmu_stop(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
unsigned long flags;
struct pmu_hw_events *events = this_cpu_ptr(cpu_pmu->hw_events);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_lock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
/* Disable all counters */
armv8pmu_pmcr_write(armv8pmu_pmcr_read() & ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_unlock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
}
static irqreturn_t armv8pmu_handle_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
@@ -722,7 +739,8 @@ static irqreturn_t armv8pmu_handle_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
* platforms that can have the PMU interrupts raised as an NMI, this
* will not work.
*/
- irq_work_run();
+ if (!armpmu_support_nmi())
+ irq_work_run();
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
matthias.bgg@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
yj.chiang@mediatek.com, Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: perf: Support NMI context for perf event ISR
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 20:48:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200516124857.75004-3-lecopzer@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200516124857.75004-1-lecopzer@gmail.com>
Perf ISR doesn't support for NMI context, thus add some necessary
condition-if to handle NMI context:
- We should not hold pmu_lock since it may have already been acquired
before NMI triggered.
- irq_work should not run at NMI context.
Signed-off-by: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index 4d7879484cec..94b404509f02 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -313,6 +313,23 @@ static inline bool armv8pmu_event_is_chained(struct perf_event *event)
(idx != ARMV8_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER);
}
+/*
+ * NMI Perf interrupts may be triggered during kernel holding
+ * same lock.
+ * Avoid acquiring lock again in NMI context.
+ */
+#define armv8pmu_lock(lock, flags) \
+ do { \
+ if (!in_nmi()) \
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags); \
+ } while (0)
+
+#define armv8pmu_unlock(lock, flags) \
+ do { \
+ if (!in_nmi()) \
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);\
+ } while (0)
+
/*
* ARMv8 low level PMU access
*/
@@ -589,7 +606,7 @@ static void armv8pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
* Enable counter and interrupt, and set the counter to count
* the event that we're interested in.
*/
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_lock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
/*
* Disable counter
@@ -611,7 +628,7 @@ static void armv8pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
*/
armv8pmu_enable_event_counter(event);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_unlock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
}
static void armv8pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -623,7 +640,7 @@ static void armv8pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
/*
* Disable counter and interrupt
*/
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_lock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
/*
* Disable counter
@@ -635,7 +652,7 @@ static void armv8pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
*/
armv8pmu_disable_event_irq(event);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_unlock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
}
static void armv8pmu_start(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
@@ -643,10 +660,10 @@ static void armv8pmu_start(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
unsigned long flags;
struct pmu_hw_events *events = this_cpu_ptr(cpu_pmu->hw_events);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_lock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
/* Enable all counters */
armv8pmu_pmcr_write(armv8pmu_pmcr_read() | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_unlock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
}
static void armv8pmu_stop(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
@@ -654,10 +671,10 @@ static void armv8pmu_stop(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
unsigned long flags;
struct pmu_hw_events *events = this_cpu_ptr(cpu_pmu->hw_events);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_lock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
/* Disable all counters */
armv8pmu_pmcr_write(armv8pmu_pmcr_read() & ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
+ armv8pmu_unlock(&events->pmu_lock, flags);
}
static irqreturn_t armv8pmu_handle_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
@@ -722,7 +739,8 @@ static irqreturn_t armv8pmu_handle_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
* platforms that can have the PMU interrupts raised as an NMI, this
* will not work.
*/
- irq_work_run();
+ if (!armpmu_support_nmi())
+ irq_work_run();
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-16 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-16 12:48 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: perf: Add support for Perf NMI interrupts Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-16 12:48 ` Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-16 12:48 ` Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-16 12:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm_pmu: Add support for perf NMI interrupts registration Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-16 12:48 ` Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-16 12:48 ` Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-17 6:39 ` Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-17 6:39 ` Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-17 6:39 ` Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-16 12:48 ` Lecopzer Chen [this message]
2020-05-16 12:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: perf: Support NMI context for perf event ISR Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-16 12:48 ` Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-16 12:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Kconfig: Add support for the Perf NMI Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-16 12:48 ` Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-16 12:48 ` Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-18 5:46 ` [PATCH 0/3] arm64: perf: Add support for Perf NMI interrupts Sumit Garg
2020-05-18 5:46 ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-18 5:46 ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-18 6:26 ` Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-18 6:26 ` Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-18 6:26 ` Lecopzer Chen
2020-05-18 10:45 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-18 10:45 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-18 10:45 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-18 11:17 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-05-18 11:17 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-05-18 11:17 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-05-18 14:09 ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-18 14:09 ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-18 14:09 ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-18 14:19 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-18 14:19 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-18 14:19 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-19 6:48 ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-19 6:48 ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-19 6:48 ` Sumit Garg
2020-05-20 6:55 ` Song Bao Hua
2020-05-20 6:55 ` Song Bao Hua
2020-05-20 6:55 ` Song Bao Hua
2020-05-20 10:30 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-05-20 10:30 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-05-20 10:30 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-05-21 3:00 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2020-05-21 3:00 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2020-05-21 3:00 ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2020-05-21 12:36 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-05-21 12:36 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-05-21 12:36 ` Alexandru Elisei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200516124857.75004-3-lecopzer@gmail.com \
--to=lecopzer@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yj.chiang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.