From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 18:56:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526015650.GA207949@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a44f9c2e-3859-6c5d-6f06-7c4c6b4c01c5@huawei.com>
On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/5/26 9:11, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2020/5/25 23:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >> On 05/25, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>> On 2020/5/25 11:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>> Shutdown test is somtimes hung, since it keeps trying to flush dirty node pages
> >>>
> >>> IMO, for umount case, we should drop dirty reference and dirty pages on meta/data
> >>> pages like we change for node pages to avoid potential dead loop...
> >>
> >> I believe we're doing for them. :P
> >
> > Actually, I mean do we need to drop dirty meta/data pages explicitly as below:
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > index 3dc3ac6fe143..4c08fd0a680a 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > @@ -299,8 +299,15 @@ static int __f2fs_write_meta_page(struct page *page,
> >
> > trace_f2fs_writepage(page, META);
> >
> > - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> > + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> > + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> > + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
> > + unlock_page(page);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > goto redirty_out;
> > + }
> > if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> > goto redirty_out;
> > if (wbc->for_reclaim && page->index < GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, 0))
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index 48a622b95b76..94b342802513 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -2682,6 +2682,12 @@ int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct page *page, int *submitted,
> >
> > /* we should bypass data pages to proceed the kworkder jobs */
> > if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> > + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> > + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > + inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
> > + unlock_page(page);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
>
> Oh, I notice previously, we will drop non-directory inode's dirty pages directly,
> however, during umount, we'd better drop directory inode's dirty pages as well, right?
Hmm, I remember I dropped them before. Need to double check.
>
> > mapping_set_error(page->mapping, -EIO);
> > /*
> > * don't drop any dirty dentry pages for keeping lastest
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>> in an inifinite loop. Let's drop dirty pages at umount in that case.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> v3:
> >>>> - fix wrong unlock
> >>>>
> >>>> v2:
> >>>> - fix typos
> >>>>
> >>>> fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>> index e632de10aedab..e0bb0f7e0506e 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>> @@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,
> >>>>
> >>>> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);
> >>>>
> >>>> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> >>>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> >>>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> >>>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> >>>> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
> >>>> + unlock_page(page);
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> goto redirty_out;
> >>>> + }
> >>>>
> >>>> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> >>>> goto redirty_out;
> >>>>
> >> .
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> > .
> >
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 18:56:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526015650.GA207949@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a44f9c2e-3859-6c5d-6f06-7c4c6b4c01c5@huawei.com>
On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/5/26 9:11, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2020/5/25 23:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >> On 05/25, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>> On 2020/5/25 11:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>> Shutdown test is somtimes hung, since it keeps trying to flush dirty node pages
> >>>
> >>> IMO, for umount case, we should drop dirty reference and dirty pages on meta/data
> >>> pages like we change for node pages to avoid potential dead loop...
> >>
> >> I believe we're doing for them. :P
> >
> > Actually, I mean do we need to drop dirty meta/data pages explicitly as below:
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > index 3dc3ac6fe143..4c08fd0a680a 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > @@ -299,8 +299,15 @@ static int __f2fs_write_meta_page(struct page *page,
> >
> > trace_f2fs_writepage(page, META);
> >
> > - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> > + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> > + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> > + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
> > + unlock_page(page);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > goto redirty_out;
> > + }
> > if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> > goto redirty_out;
> > if (wbc->for_reclaim && page->index < GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, 0))
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index 48a622b95b76..94b342802513 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -2682,6 +2682,12 @@ int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct page *page, int *submitted,
> >
> > /* we should bypass data pages to proceed the kworkder jobs */
> > if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> > + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> > + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > + inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
> > + unlock_page(page);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
>
> Oh, I notice previously, we will drop non-directory inode's dirty pages directly,
> however, during umount, we'd better drop directory inode's dirty pages as well, right?
Hmm, I remember I dropped them before. Need to double check.
>
> > mapping_set_error(page->mapping, -EIO);
> > /*
> > * don't drop any dirty dentry pages for keeping lastest
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>> in an inifinite loop. Let's drop dirty pages at umount in that case.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> v3:
> >>>> - fix wrong unlock
> >>>>
> >>>> v2:
> >>>> - fix typos
> >>>>
> >>>> fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>> index e632de10aedab..e0bb0f7e0506e 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>> @@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,
> >>>>
> >>>> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);
> >>>>
> >>>> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> >>>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> >>>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> >>>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> >>>> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
> >>>> + unlock_page(page);
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> goto redirty_out;
> >>>> + }
> >>>>
> >>>> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> >>>> goto redirty_out;
> >>>>
> >> .
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> > .
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-26 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-22 14:47 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-22 14:47 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-22 23:32 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-22 23:32 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-25 3:56 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] " Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-25 3:56 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-25 6:30 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2020-05-25 6:30 ` Chao Yu
2020-05-25 15:06 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-25 15:06 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-26 1:11 ` Chao Yu
2020-05-26 1:11 ` Chao Yu
2020-05-26 1:34 ` Chao Yu
2020-05-26 1:34 ` Chao Yu
2020-05-26 1:56 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2020-05-26 1:56 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-27 2:35 ` Chao Yu
2020-05-27 2:35 ` Chao Yu
2020-05-27 20:56 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-27 20:56 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-05-28 1:20 ` Chao Yu
2020-05-28 1:20 ` Chao Yu
2020-05-25 2:16 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] " Chao Yu
2020-05-25 2:16 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200526015650.GA207949@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.