From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
x86@kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] checkpatch: Remove awareness of uninitialized_var() macro
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:40:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006031838.55722640DC@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff9087b0571e1fc499bd8a4c9fd99bfc0357f245.camel@perches.com>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 05:02:29PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 16:32 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1]
> > (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings
> > (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized,
> > either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes.
> >
> > In preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], effectively revert
> > commit 16b7f3c89907 ("checkpatch: avoid warning about uninitialized_var()")
> > and remove all remaining mentions of uninitialized_var().
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/
> > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/
> > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/
>
> nack. see below.
>
> I'd prefer a simple revert, but it shouldn't
> be done here.
What do you mean? (I can't understand this and "fine by me" below?)
>
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
> > @@ -4075,7 +4074,7 @@ sub process {
> > }
> >
> > # check for function declarations without arguments like "int foo()"
> > - if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s*$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
> > + if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s+$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
>
> This isn't right because $Type includes a possible trailing *
> where there isn't a space between $Type and $Ident
Ah, hm, that was changed in the mentioned commit:
- if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s+$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
+ if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s*$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
>
> e.g.: int *bar(void);
>
> Other than that, fine by me...
Thanks for looking it over! I'll adjust it however you'd like. :)
--
Kees Cook
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com
Subject: Re: [Drbd-dev] [PATCH 08/10] checkpatch: Remove awareness of uninitialized_var() macro
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:40:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202006031838.55722640DC@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff9087b0571e1fc499bd8a4c9fd99bfc0357f245.camel@perches.com>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 05:02:29PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 16:32 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1]
> > (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings
> > (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized,
> > either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes.
> >
> > In preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], effectively revert
> > commit 16b7f3c89907 ("checkpatch: avoid warning about uninitialized_var()")
> > and remove all remaining mentions of uninitialized_var().
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/
> > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/
> > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/
>
> nack. see below.
>
> I'd prefer a simple revert, but it shouldn't
> be done here.
What do you mean? (I can't understand this and "fine by me" below?)
>
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
> > @@ -4075,7 +4074,7 @@ sub process {
> > }
> >
> > # check for function declarations without arguments like "int foo()"
> > - if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s*$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
> > + if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s+$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
>
> This isn't right because $Type includes a possible trailing *
> where there isn't a space between $Type and $Ident
Ah, hm, that was changed in the mentioned commit:
- if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s+$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
+ if ($line =~ /(\b$Type\s*$Ident)\s*\(\s*\)/) {
>
> e.g.: int *bar(void);
>
> Other than that, fine by me...
Thanks for looking it over! I'll adjust it however you'd like. :)
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-04 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-03 23:31 [PATCH 00/10] Remove uninitialized_var() macro Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86/mm/numa: Remove uninitialized_var() usage Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 7:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-04 7:58 ` [Drbd-dev] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-04 11:41 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 11:41 ` [Drbd-dev] " Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 14:56 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 14:56 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 15:22 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 15:22 ` [Drbd-dev] " Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 14:34 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 14:34 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 21:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-04 21:39 ` [Drbd-dev] " Thomas Gleixner
2020-06-04 22:39 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 22:39 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 02/10] drbd: " Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 19:56 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 19:56 ` [Drbd-dev] " Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 03/10] b43: " Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:08 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 20:08 ` [Drbd-dev] " Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 20:18 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:18 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:25 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 20:25 ` [Drbd-dev] " Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-05 9:20 ` Kalle Valo
2020-06-05 9:20 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kalle Valo
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 04/10] rtlwifi: rtl8192cu: " Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:16 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 20:16 ` [Drbd-dev] " Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-05 9:18 ` Kalle Valo
2020-06-05 9:18 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kalle Valo
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 05/10] ide: " Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 19:29 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 19:29 ` [Drbd-dev] " Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 20:20 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:20 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:29 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 20:29 ` [Drbd-dev] " Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-15 19:32 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-15 19:32 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 20:58 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 20:58 ` [Drbd-dev] " Sedat Dilek
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [PATCH 06/10] clk: st: " Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:31 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 4:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2020-06-04 4:38 ` [Drbd-dev] " Stephen Boyd
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [PATCH 07/10] spi: davinci: " Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 19:40 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 19:40 ` [Drbd-dev] " Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [PATCH 08/10] checkpatch: Remove awareness of uninitialized_var() macro Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 0:02 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-04 0:02 ` [Drbd-dev] " Joe Perches
2020-06-04 1:40 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-06-04 1:40 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 1:47 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-04 1:47 ` [Drbd-dev] " Joe Perches
2020-06-04 2:44 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 2:44 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 2:53 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 2:53 ` [Drbd-dev] " Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 3:46 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 3:46 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [PATCH 09/10] treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage Kees Cook
2020-06-04 3:33 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-06-04 3:33 ` [Drbd-dev] " Nathan Chancellor
2020-06-04 4:02 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 4:02 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 10:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-06-04 10:45 ` [Drbd-dev] " Leon Romanovsky
2020-06-04 11:33 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-04 13:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-06-04 13:23 ` [Drbd-dev] " Jason Gunthorpe
2020-06-04 14:59 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 14:59 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 17:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-06-04 17:57 ` [Drbd-dev] " Jason Gunthorpe
2020-06-04 19:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-04 19:09 ` [Drbd-dev] " Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-05 9:25 ` Kalle Valo
2020-06-05 9:25 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kalle Valo
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [PATCH 10/10] compiler: Remove uninitialized_var() macro Kees Cook
2020-06-03 23:32 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 0:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-04 0:00 ` [Drbd-dev] " Bart Van Assche
2020-06-04 0:50 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 0:50 ` [Drbd-dev] " Miguel Ojeda
2020-06-04 1:23 ` [PATCH 00/10] " Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 1:23 ` [Drbd-dev] " Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 1:44 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 1:44 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
2020-06-04 1:46 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 1:46 ` [Drbd-dev] " Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 3:33 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-06-04 3:33 ` [Drbd-dev] " Nathan Chancellor
2020-06-04 7:26 ` Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 7:26 ` [Drbd-dev] " Sedat Dilek
2020-06-04 14:27 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 14:27 ` [Drbd-dev] " Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202006031838.55722640DC@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.