All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, George Cherian <gcherian@marvell.com>,
	"Zengtao \(B\)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] KVM: arm64: Factor out stage 2 page table data from struct kvm
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:40:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617134017.11e8cd15@why> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200615132719.1932408-2-maz@kernel.org>

On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:27:03 +0100
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> 
> As we are about to reuse our stage 2 page table manipulation code for
> shadow stage 2 page tables in the context of nested virtualization, we
> are going to manage multiple stage 2 page tables for a single VM.
> 
> This requires some pretty invasive changes to our data structures,
> which moves the vmid and pgd pointers into a separate structure and
> change pretty much all of our mmu code to operate on this structure
> instead.
> 
> The new structure is called struct kvm_s2_mmu.
> 
> There is no intended functional change by this patch alone.
> 
> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> [Designed data structure layout in collaboration]
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> [maz: Moved the last_vcpu_ran down to the S2 MMU structure as well]
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h  |   7 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  32 +++-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h  |  16 +-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              |  36 ++--
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c       |   8 +-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c          |  52 +++---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c              | 278 +++++++++++++++++-------------
>  7 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 196 deletions(-)

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
> index d063a576d511..993c74cc054c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct tlb_inv_context {
>  	u64		sctlr;
>  };
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
>  						 struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	u64 val;
> @@ -53,14 +53,14 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	 * place before clearing TGE. __load_guest_stage2() already
>  	 * has an ISB in order to deal with this.
>  	 */
> -	__load_guest_stage2(kvm);
> +	__load_guest_stage2(mmu);
>  	val = read_sysreg(hcr_el2);
>  	val &= ~HCR_TGE;
>  	write_sysreg(val, hcr_el2);
>  	isb();
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
>  						  struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT)) {
> @@ -79,22 +79,19 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		isb();
>  	}
>  
> -	/* __load_guest_stage2() includes an ISB for the workaround. */
> -	__load_guest_stage2(kvm);
> -	asm(ALTERNATIVE("isb", "nop", ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT));
> +	__load_guest_stage2(mmu);
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest(struct kvm *kvm,
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
>  					     struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	if (has_vhe())
> -		__tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(kvm, cxt);
> +		__tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(mmu, cxt);
>  	else
> -		__tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(kvm, cxt);
> +		__tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(mmu, cxt);
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> -						struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * We're done with the TLB operation, let's restore the host's
> @@ -113,8 +110,7 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	local_irq_restore(cxt->flags);
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> -						 struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	write_sysreg(0, vttbr_el2);
>  
> @@ -126,24 +122,23 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host(struct kvm *kvm,
> -					    struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host(struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	if (has_vhe())
> -		__tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(kvm, cxt);
> +		__tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(cxt);
>  	else
> -		__tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(kvm, cxt);
> +		__tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(cxt);
>  }
>  
> -void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa)
> +void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t ipa)
>  {
>  	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
>  
>  	dsb(ishst);
>  
>  	/* Switch to requested VMID */
> -	kvm = kern_hyp_va(kvm);
> -	__tlb_switch_to_guest(kvm, &cxt);
> +	mmu = kern_hyp_va(mmu);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We could do so much better if we had the VA as well.
> @@ -186,39 +181,38 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa)
>  	if (!has_vhe() && icache_is_vpipt())
>  		__flush_icache_all();
>  
> -	__tlb_switch_to_host(kvm, &cxt);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
>  }
>  
> -void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm *kvm)
> +void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>  {
>  	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
>  
>  	dsb(ishst);
>  
>  	/* Switch to requested VMID */
> -	kvm = kern_hyp_va(kvm);
> -	__tlb_switch_to_guest(kvm, &cxt);
> +	mmu = kern_hyp_va(mmu);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
>  
>  	__tlbi(vmalls12e1is);
>  	dsb(ish);
>  	isb();
>  
> -	__tlb_switch_to_host(kvm, &cxt);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
>  }
>  
> -void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>  {
> -	struct kvm *kvm = kern_hyp_va(kern_hyp_va(vcpu)->kvm);
>  	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
>  
>  	/* Switch to requested VMID */
> -	__tlb_switch_to_guest(kvm, &cxt);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);

The astute reviewer will have noticed that this sequence is unlikely
to work on non-VHE systems, as what we get here is a kernel address.

I fixed it with the following patch:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
index 993c74cc054c..e41217946289 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct
kvm_s2_mmu *mmu) struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
 
 	/* Switch to requested VMID */
+	mmu = kern_hyp_va(mmu);
 	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
 
 	__tlbi(vmalle1);

and tested that things work as expected on such a system. I'll push out
an updated branch shortly.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, George Cherian <gcherian@marvell.com>,
	"Zengtao \(B\)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] KVM: arm64: Factor out stage 2 page table data from struct kvm
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:40:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617134017.11e8cd15@why> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200615132719.1932408-2-maz@kernel.org>

On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:27:03 +0100
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> 
> As we are about to reuse our stage 2 page table manipulation code for
> shadow stage 2 page tables in the context of nested virtualization, we
> are going to manage multiple stage 2 page tables for a single VM.
> 
> This requires some pretty invasive changes to our data structures,
> which moves the vmid and pgd pointers into a separate structure and
> change pretty much all of our mmu code to operate on this structure
> instead.
> 
> The new structure is called struct kvm_s2_mmu.
> 
> There is no intended functional change by this patch alone.
> 
> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> [Designed data structure layout in collaboration]
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> [maz: Moved the last_vcpu_ran down to the S2 MMU structure as well]
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h  |   7 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  32 +++-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h  |  16 +-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              |  36 ++--
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c       |   8 +-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c          |  52 +++---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c              | 278 +++++++++++++++++-------------
>  7 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 196 deletions(-)

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
> index d063a576d511..993c74cc054c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct tlb_inv_context {
>  	u64		sctlr;
>  };
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
>  						 struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	u64 val;
> @@ -53,14 +53,14 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	 * place before clearing TGE. __load_guest_stage2() already
>  	 * has an ISB in order to deal with this.
>  	 */
> -	__load_guest_stage2(kvm);
> +	__load_guest_stage2(mmu);
>  	val = read_sysreg(hcr_el2);
>  	val &= ~HCR_TGE;
>  	write_sysreg(val, hcr_el2);
>  	isb();
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
>  						  struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT)) {
> @@ -79,22 +79,19 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		isb();
>  	}
>  
> -	/* __load_guest_stage2() includes an ISB for the workaround. */
> -	__load_guest_stage2(kvm);
> -	asm(ALTERNATIVE("isb", "nop", ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT));
> +	__load_guest_stage2(mmu);
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest(struct kvm *kvm,
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
>  					     struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	if (has_vhe())
> -		__tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(kvm, cxt);
> +		__tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(mmu, cxt);
>  	else
> -		__tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(kvm, cxt);
> +		__tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(mmu, cxt);
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> -						struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * We're done with the TLB operation, let's restore the host's
> @@ -113,8 +110,7 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	local_irq_restore(cxt->flags);
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> -						 struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	write_sysreg(0, vttbr_el2);
>  
> @@ -126,24 +122,23 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host(struct kvm *kvm,
> -					    struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host(struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	if (has_vhe())
> -		__tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(kvm, cxt);
> +		__tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(cxt);
>  	else
> -		__tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(kvm, cxt);
> +		__tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(cxt);
>  }
>  
> -void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa)
> +void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t ipa)
>  {
>  	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
>  
>  	dsb(ishst);
>  
>  	/* Switch to requested VMID */
> -	kvm = kern_hyp_va(kvm);
> -	__tlb_switch_to_guest(kvm, &cxt);
> +	mmu = kern_hyp_va(mmu);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We could do so much better if we had the VA as well.
> @@ -186,39 +181,38 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa)
>  	if (!has_vhe() && icache_is_vpipt())
>  		__flush_icache_all();
>  
> -	__tlb_switch_to_host(kvm, &cxt);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
>  }
>  
> -void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm *kvm)
> +void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>  {
>  	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
>  
>  	dsb(ishst);
>  
>  	/* Switch to requested VMID */
> -	kvm = kern_hyp_va(kvm);
> -	__tlb_switch_to_guest(kvm, &cxt);
> +	mmu = kern_hyp_va(mmu);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
>  
>  	__tlbi(vmalls12e1is);
>  	dsb(ish);
>  	isb();
>  
> -	__tlb_switch_to_host(kvm, &cxt);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
>  }
>  
> -void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>  {
> -	struct kvm *kvm = kern_hyp_va(kern_hyp_va(vcpu)->kvm);
>  	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
>  
>  	/* Switch to requested VMID */
> -	__tlb_switch_to_guest(kvm, &cxt);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);

The astute reviewer will have noticed that this sequence is unlikely
to work on non-VHE systems, as what we get here is a kernel address.

I fixed it with the following patch:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
index 993c74cc054c..e41217946289 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct
kvm_s2_mmu *mmu) struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
 
 	/* Switch to requested VMID */
+	mmu = kern_hyp_va(mmu);
 	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
 
 	__tlbi(vmalle1);

and tested that things work as expected on such a system. I'll push out
an updated branch shortly.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	George Cherian <gcherian@marvell.com>,
	"Zengtao \(B\)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] KVM: arm64: Factor out stage 2 page table data from struct kvm
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:40:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200617134017.11e8cd15@why> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200615132719.1932408-2-maz@kernel.org>

On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:27:03 +0100
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> 
> As we are about to reuse our stage 2 page table manipulation code for
> shadow stage 2 page tables in the context of nested virtualization, we
> are going to manage multiple stage 2 page tables for a single VM.
> 
> This requires some pretty invasive changes to our data structures,
> which moves the vmid and pgd pointers into a separate structure and
> change pretty much all of our mmu code to operate on this structure
> instead.
> 
> The new structure is called struct kvm_s2_mmu.
> 
> There is no intended functional change by this patch alone.
> 
> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> [Designed data structure layout in collaboration]
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> [maz: Moved the last_vcpu_ran down to the S2 MMU structure as well]
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h  |   7 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  32 +++-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h  |  16 +-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              |  36 ++--
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c       |   8 +-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c          |  52 +++---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c              | 278 +++++++++++++++++-------------
>  7 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 196 deletions(-)

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
> index d063a576d511..993c74cc054c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct tlb_inv_context {
>  	u64		sctlr;
>  };
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
>  						 struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	u64 val;
> @@ -53,14 +53,14 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	 * place before clearing TGE. __load_guest_stage2() already
>  	 * has an ISB in order to deal with this.
>  	 */
> -	__load_guest_stage2(kvm);
> +	__load_guest_stage2(mmu);
>  	val = read_sysreg(hcr_el2);
>  	val &= ~HCR_TGE;
>  	write_sysreg(val, hcr_el2);
>  	isb();
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
>  						  struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT)) {
> @@ -79,22 +79,19 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		isb();
>  	}
>  
> -	/* __load_guest_stage2() includes an ISB for the workaround. */
> -	__load_guest_stage2(kvm);
> -	asm(ALTERNATIVE("isb", "nop", ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT));
> +	__load_guest_stage2(mmu);
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest(struct kvm *kvm,
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
>  					     struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	if (has_vhe())
> -		__tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(kvm, cxt);
> +		__tlb_switch_to_guest_vhe(mmu, cxt);
>  	else
> -		__tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(kvm, cxt);
> +		__tlb_switch_to_guest_nvhe(mmu, cxt);
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> -						struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * We're done with the TLB operation, let's restore the host's
> @@ -113,8 +110,7 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	local_irq_restore(cxt->flags);
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
> -						 struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	write_sysreg(0, vttbr_el2);
>  
> @@ -126,24 +122,23 @@ static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host(struct kvm *kvm,
> -					    struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
> +static void __hyp_text __tlb_switch_to_host(struct tlb_inv_context *cxt)
>  {
>  	if (has_vhe())
> -		__tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(kvm, cxt);
> +		__tlb_switch_to_host_vhe(cxt);
>  	else
> -		__tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(kvm, cxt);
> +		__tlb_switch_to_host_nvhe(cxt);
>  }
>  
> -void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa)
> +void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t ipa)
>  {
>  	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
>  
>  	dsb(ishst);
>  
>  	/* Switch to requested VMID */
> -	kvm = kern_hyp_va(kvm);
> -	__tlb_switch_to_guest(kvm, &cxt);
> +	mmu = kern_hyp_va(mmu);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * We could do so much better if we had the VA as well.
> @@ -186,39 +181,38 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t ipa)
>  	if (!has_vhe() && icache_is_vpipt())
>  		__flush_icache_all();
>  
> -	__tlb_switch_to_host(kvm, &cxt);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
>  }
>  
> -void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm *kvm)
> +void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>  {
>  	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
>  
>  	dsb(ishst);
>  
>  	/* Switch to requested VMID */
> -	kvm = kern_hyp_va(kvm);
> -	__tlb_switch_to_guest(kvm, &cxt);
> +	mmu = kern_hyp_va(mmu);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
>  
>  	__tlbi(vmalls12e1is);
>  	dsb(ish);
>  	isb();
>  
> -	__tlb_switch_to_host(kvm, &cxt);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_host(&cxt);
>  }
>  
> -void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>  {
> -	struct kvm *kvm = kern_hyp_va(kern_hyp_va(vcpu)->kvm);
>  	struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
>  
>  	/* Switch to requested VMID */
> -	__tlb_switch_to_guest(kvm, &cxt);
> +	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);

The astute reviewer will have noticed that this sequence is unlikely
to work on non-VHE systems, as what we get here is a kernel address.

I fixed it with the following patch:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
index 993c74cc054c..e41217946289 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
@@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_flush_local_vmid(struct
kvm_s2_mmu *mmu) struct tlb_inv_context cxt;
 
 	/* Switch to requested VMID */
+	mmu = kern_hyp_va(mmu);
 	__tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
 
 	__tlbi(vmalle1);

and tested that things work as expected on such a system. I'll push out
an updated branch shortly.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-17 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-15 13:27 [PATCH v2 00/17] KVM: arm64: Preliminary NV patches Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] KVM: arm64: Factor out stage 2 page table data from struct kvm Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-16 15:59   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-16 15:59     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-16 15:59     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-16 16:18     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-16 16:18       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-16 16:18       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-17 12:58       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 12:58         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 12:58         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 12:19       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 12:19         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 12:19         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-06 12:17         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-06 12:17           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-06 12:17           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-06 15:49           ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-06 15:49             ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-06 15:49             ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 12:40   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-06-17 12:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-17 12:40     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-25 12:49   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 12:49     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 12:49     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-13  9:47   ` Andrew Scull
2020-07-13  9:47     ` Andrew Scull
2020-07-13  9:47     ` Andrew Scull
2020-07-13 14:20     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-13 14:20       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-13 14:20       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] arm64: Detect the ARMv8.4 TTL feature Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] arm64: Document SW reserved PTE/PMD bits in Stage-2 descriptors Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] arm64: Add level-hinted TLB invalidation helper Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-25 16:24   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 16:24     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 16:24     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] KVM: arm64: Use TTL hint in when invalidating stage-2 translations Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-26 13:14   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-26 13:14     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-26 13:14     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce accessor for ctxt->sys_reg Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-26 15:39   ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-26 15:39     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-26 15:39     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-06 12:15     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-06 12:15       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-06 12:15       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-06 12:35       ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-06 12:35         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-06 12:35         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] KVM: arm64: hyp: Use ctxt_sys_reg/__vcpu_sys_reg instead of raw sys_regs access Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] KVM: arm64: sve: Use __vcpu_sys_reg() " Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] KVM: arm64: pauth: Use ctxt_sys_reg() " Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] KVM: arm64: debug: " Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] KVM: arm64: Make struct kvm_regs userspace-only Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] KVM: arm64: Move ELR_EL1 to the system register array Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] KVM: arm64: Move SP_EL1 " Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] KVM: arm64: Disintegrate SPSR array Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] KVM: arm64: Move SPSR_EL1 to the system register array Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] KVM: arm64: timers: Rename kvm_timer_sync_hwstate to kvm_timer_sync_user Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] KVM: arm64: timers: Move timer registers to the sys_regs file Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200617134017.11e8cd15@why \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.