From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
George Cherian <gcherian@marvell.com>,
"Zengtao \(B\)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] KVM: arm64: Factor out stage 2 page table data from struct kvm
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 13:17:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3f34d53dfe8bc3c2b0838187fe12538@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3804b25-4ce4-b263-c087-d8e563f939ed@arm.com>
On 2020-06-25 13:19, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 6/16/20 5:18 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Alexandru,
>> [..]
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>> /**
>>>> - * kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd - allocate level-1 table for stage-2
>>>> translation.
>>>> - * @kvm: The KVM struct pointer for the VM.
>>>> + * kvm_init_stage2_mmu - Initialise a S2 MMU strucrure
>>>> + * @kvm: The pointer to the KVM structure
>>>> + * @mmu: The pointer to the s2 MMU structure
>>>> *
>>>> * Allocates only the stage-2 HW PGD level table(s) of size defined
>>>> by
>>>> - * stage2_pgd_size(kvm).
>>>> + * stage2_pgd_size(mmu->kvm).
>>>> *
>>>> * Note we don't need locking here as this is only called when the
>>>> VM is
>>>> * created, which can only be done once.
>>>> */
>>>> -int kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>> +int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>>>> {
>>>> phys_addr_t pgd_phys;
>>>> pgd_t *pgd;
>>>> + int cpu;
>>>>
>>>> - if (kvm->arch.pgd != NULL) {
>>>> + if (mmu->pgd != NULL) {
>>>> kvm_err("kvm_arch already initialized?\n");
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1024,8 +1040,20 @@ int kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>> if (WARN_ON(pgd_phys & ~kvm_vttbr_baddr_mask(kvm)))
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> We don't free the pgd if we get the error above, but we do free it
>>> below, if
>>> allocating last_vcpu_ran fails. Shouldn't we free it in both cases?
>>
>> Worth investigating. This code gets majorly revamped in the NV series,
>> so it is
>> likely that I missed something in the middle.
>
> You didn't miss anything, I checked and it's the same in the upstream
> version of KVM.
>
> kvm_arch_init_vm() returns with an error if this functions fails, so
> it's up to
> the function to do the clean up. kvm_alloc_pages_exact() returns NULL
> on error, so
> at this point we have a valid allocation of physical contiguous pages.
> Failing to
> create a VM is not a fatal error for the system, so I'm thinking that
> maybe we
> should free those pages for the rest of the system to use. However,
> this is a
> minor issue, and the patch isn't supposed to make any functional
> changes, so it
> can be probably be left for another patch and not add more to an
> already big series.
Cool. Will you be posting such patch?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
George Cherian <gcherian@marvell.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>,
"Zengtao \(B\)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] KVM: arm64: Factor out stage 2 page table data from struct kvm
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 13:17:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3f34d53dfe8bc3c2b0838187fe12538@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3804b25-4ce4-b263-c087-d8e563f939ed@arm.com>
On 2020-06-25 13:19, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 6/16/20 5:18 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Alexandru,
>> [..]
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>> /**
>>>> - * kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd - allocate level-1 table for stage-2
>>>> translation.
>>>> - * @kvm: The KVM struct pointer for the VM.
>>>> + * kvm_init_stage2_mmu - Initialise a S2 MMU strucrure
>>>> + * @kvm: The pointer to the KVM structure
>>>> + * @mmu: The pointer to the s2 MMU structure
>>>> *
>>>> * Allocates only the stage-2 HW PGD level table(s) of size defined
>>>> by
>>>> - * stage2_pgd_size(kvm).
>>>> + * stage2_pgd_size(mmu->kvm).
>>>> *
>>>> * Note we don't need locking here as this is only called when the
>>>> VM is
>>>> * created, which can only be done once.
>>>> */
>>>> -int kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>> +int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>>>> {
>>>> phys_addr_t pgd_phys;
>>>> pgd_t *pgd;
>>>> + int cpu;
>>>>
>>>> - if (kvm->arch.pgd != NULL) {
>>>> + if (mmu->pgd != NULL) {
>>>> kvm_err("kvm_arch already initialized?\n");
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1024,8 +1040,20 @@ int kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>> if (WARN_ON(pgd_phys & ~kvm_vttbr_baddr_mask(kvm)))
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> We don't free the pgd if we get the error above, but we do free it
>>> below, if
>>> allocating last_vcpu_ran fails. Shouldn't we free it in both cases?
>>
>> Worth investigating. This code gets majorly revamped in the NV series,
>> so it is
>> likely that I missed something in the middle.
>
> You didn't miss anything, I checked and it's the same in the upstream
> version of KVM.
>
> kvm_arch_init_vm() returns with an error if this functions fails, so
> it's up to
> the function to do the clean up. kvm_alloc_pages_exact() returns NULL
> on error, so
> at this point we have a valid allocation of physical contiguous pages.
> Failing to
> create a VM is not a fatal error for the system, so I'm thinking that
> maybe we
> should free those pages for the rest of the system to use. However,
> this is a
> minor issue, and the patch isn't supposed to make any functional
> changes, so it
> can be probably be left for another patch and not add more to an
> already big series.
Cool. Will you be posting such patch?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
George Cherian <gcherian@marvell.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Andrew Scull <ascull@google.com>,
"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] KVM: arm64: Factor out stage 2 page table data from struct kvm
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 13:17:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3f34d53dfe8bc3c2b0838187fe12538@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3804b25-4ce4-b263-c087-d8e563f939ed@arm.com>
On 2020-06-25 13:19, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 6/16/20 5:18 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Hi Alexandru,
>> [..]
>>>> [..]
>>>>
>>>> /**
>>>> - * kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd - allocate level-1 table for stage-2
>>>> translation.
>>>> - * @kvm: The KVM struct pointer for the VM.
>>>> + * kvm_init_stage2_mmu - Initialise a S2 MMU strucrure
>>>> + * @kvm: The pointer to the KVM structure
>>>> + * @mmu: The pointer to the s2 MMU structure
>>>> *
>>>> * Allocates only the stage-2 HW PGD level table(s) of size defined
>>>> by
>>>> - * stage2_pgd_size(kvm).
>>>> + * stage2_pgd_size(mmu->kvm).
>>>> *
>>>> * Note we don't need locking here as this is only called when the
>>>> VM is
>>>> * created, which can only be done once.
>>>> */
>>>> -int kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>> +int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>>>> {
>>>> phys_addr_t pgd_phys;
>>>> pgd_t *pgd;
>>>> + int cpu;
>>>>
>>>> - if (kvm->arch.pgd != NULL) {
>>>> + if (mmu->pgd != NULL) {
>>>> kvm_err("kvm_arch already initialized?\n");
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -1024,8 +1040,20 @@ int kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>> if (WARN_ON(pgd_phys & ~kvm_vttbr_baddr_mask(kvm)))
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> We don't free the pgd if we get the error above, but we do free it
>>> below, if
>>> allocating last_vcpu_ran fails. Shouldn't we free it in both cases?
>>
>> Worth investigating. This code gets majorly revamped in the NV series,
>> so it is
>> likely that I missed something in the middle.
>
> You didn't miss anything, I checked and it's the same in the upstream
> version of KVM.
>
> kvm_arch_init_vm() returns with an error if this functions fails, so
> it's up to
> the function to do the clean up. kvm_alloc_pages_exact() returns NULL
> on error, so
> at this point we have a valid allocation of physical contiguous pages.
> Failing to
> create a VM is not a fatal error for the system, so I'm thinking that
> maybe we
> should free those pages for the rest of the system to use. However,
> this is a
> minor issue, and the patch isn't supposed to make any functional
> changes, so it
> can be probably be left for another patch and not add more to an
> already big series.
Cool. Will you be posting such patch?
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-06 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-15 13:27 [PATCH v2 00/17] KVM: arm64: Preliminary NV patches Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] KVM: arm64: Factor out stage 2 page table data from struct kvm Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-16 15:59 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-16 15:59 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-16 15:59 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-16 16:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-16 16:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-16 16:18 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-17 12:58 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 12:58 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 12:58 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 12:19 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 12:19 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 12:19 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-06 12:17 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-07-06 12:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-06 12:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-06 15:49 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-06 15:49 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-06 15:49 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-17 12:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-17 12:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-17 12:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-25 12:49 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 12:49 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 12:49 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-13 9:47 ` Andrew Scull
2020-07-13 9:47 ` Andrew Scull
2020-07-13 9:47 ` Andrew Scull
2020-07-13 14:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-13 14:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-13 14:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] arm64: Detect the ARMv8.4 TTL feature Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] arm64: Document SW reserved PTE/PMD bits in Stage-2 descriptors Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] arm64: Add level-hinted TLB invalidation helper Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-25 16:24 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 16:24 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-25 16:24 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] KVM: arm64: Use TTL hint in when invalidating stage-2 translations Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-26 13:14 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-26 13:14 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-26 13:14 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce accessor for ctxt->sys_reg Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-26 15:39 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-26 15:39 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-26 15:39 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-06 12:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-06 12:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-06 12:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-06 12:35 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-06 12:35 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-07-06 12:35 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] KVM: arm64: hyp: Use ctxt_sys_reg/__vcpu_sys_reg instead of raw sys_regs access Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] KVM: arm64: sve: Use __vcpu_sys_reg() " Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] KVM: arm64: pauth: Use ctxt_sys_reg() " Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] KVM: arm64: debug: " Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] KVM: arm64: Make struct kvm_regs userspace-only Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] KVM: arm64: Move ELR_EL1 to the system register array Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] KVM: arm64: Move SP_EL1 " Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] KVM: arm64: Disintegrate SPSR array Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] KVM: arm64: Move SPSR_EL1 to the system register array Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] KVM: arm64: timers: Rename kvm_timer_sync_hwstate to kvm_timer_sync_user Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] KVM: arm64: timers: Move timer registers to the sys_regs file Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-15 13:27 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b3f34d53dfe8bc3c2b0838187fe12538@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.