From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: flood of "dm-X: error: dax access failed" due to 5.9 commit 231609785cbfb
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:04:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200902160432.GA5513@redhat.com> (raw)
5.9 commit 231609785cbfb ("dax: print error message by pr_info() in
__generic_fsdax_supported()") switched from pr_debug() to pr_info().
The justification in the commit header is really inadequate. If there
is a problem that you need to drill in on, repeat the testing after
enabling the dynamic debugging.
Otherwise, now all DM devices that aren't layered on DAX capable devices
spew really confusing noise to users when they simply activate their
non-DAX DM devices:
[66567.129798] dm-6: error: dax access failed (-5)
[66567.134400] dm-6: error: dax access failed (-5)
[66567.139152] dm-6: error: dax access failed (-5)
[66567.314546] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.319380] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.324254] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.479025] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.483713] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.488722] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.494061] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.498823] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.503693] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
commit 231609785cbfb must be reverted.
Please advise, thanks.
Mike
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: flood of "dm-X: error: dax access failed" due to 5.9 commit 231609785cbfb
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 12:04:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200902160432.GA5513@redhat.com> (raw)
5.9 commit 231609785cbfb ("dax: print error message by pr_info() in
__generic_fsdax_supported()") switched from pr_debug() to pr_info().
The justification in the commit header is really inadequate. If there
is a problem that you need to drill in on, repeat the testing after
enabling the dynamic debugging.
Otherwise, now all DM devices that aren't layered on DAX capable devices
spew really confusing noise to users when they simply activate their
non-DAX DM devices:
[66567.129798] dm-6: error: dax access failed (-5)
[66567.134400] dm-6: error: dax access failed (-5)
[66567.139152] dm-6: error: dax access failed (-5)
[66567.314546] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.319380] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.324254] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.479025] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.483713] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.488722] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.494061] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.498823] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
[66567.503693] dm-2: error: dax access failed (-95)
commit 231609785cbfb must be reverted.
Please advise, thanks.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
next reply other threads:[~2020-09-02 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-02 16:04 Mike Snitzer [this message]
2020-09-02 16:04 ` flood of "dm-X: error: dax access failed" due to 5.9 commit 231609785cbfb Mike Snitzer
2020-09-02 16:40 ` Coly Li
2020-09-02 16:40 ` Coly Li
2020-09-02 16:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-09-02 16:44 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-09-02 16:46 ` Coly Li
2020-09-02 16:46 ` Coly Li
2020-09-02 16:51 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-09-02 16:51 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-09-02 16:53 ` Coly Li
2020-09-02 16:53 ` Coly Li
2020-09-03 5:05 ` Coly Li
2020-09-03 5:05 ` Coly Li
2020-09-03 5:20 ` Coly Li
2020-09-03 8:37 ` Coly Li
2020-09-03 11:24 ` [External] " Adrian Huang12
2020-09-03 11:31 ` Coly Li
2020-09-03 11:09 ` Adrian Huang12
2020-09-03 11:24 ` Coly Li
2020-09-02 23:05 ` Verma, Vishal L
2020-09-02 23:05 ` Verma, Vishal L
2020-09-03 3:32 ` Coly Li
2020-09-03 3:32 ` Coly Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200902160432.GA5513@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.