From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] tools/virtiofs: Multi threading seems to hurt performance
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:56:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922225602.GJ57620@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922110946.GB2836@work-vm>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:09:46PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> Do you have the numbers for:
> epool
> epool thread-pool-size=1
> spool
Hi David,
Ok, I re-ran my numbers again after upgrading to latest qemu and also
upgraded host kernel to latest upstream. Apart from comparing I epool,
spool and 1Thread, I also ran their numa variants. That is I launched
qemu and virtiofsd on node 0 of machine (numactl --cpunodebind=0).
Results are kind of mixed. Here are my takeaways.
- Running on same numa node improves performance overall for exclusive,
shared and exclusive-1T mode.
- In general both shared pool and exclusive-1T mode seem to perform
better than exclusive mode, except for the case of randwrite-libaio.
In some cases (seqread-libaio, seqwrite-libaio, seqwrite-libaio-multi)
exclusive pool performs better than exclusive-1T.
- Looks like in some cases exclusive-1T performs better than shared
pool. (randwrite-libaio, randwrite-psync-multi, seqwrite-psync-multi,
seqwrite-psync, seqread-libaio-multi, seqread-psync-multi)
Overall, I feel that both exlusive-1T and shared perform better than
exclusive pool. Results between exclusive-1T and shared pool are mixed.
It seems like in many cases exclusve-1T performs better. I would say
that moving to "shared" pool seems like a reasonable option.
Thanks
Vivek
NAME WORKLOAD Bandwidth IOPS
vtfs-none-epool seqread-psync 38(MiB/s) 9967
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqread-psync 66(MiB/s) 16k
vtfs-none-spool seqread-psync 67(MiB/s) 16k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqread-psync 48(MiB/s) 12k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqread-psync 74(MiB/s) 18k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqread-psync 74(MiB/s) 18k
vtfs-none-epool seqread-psync-multi 204(MiB/s) 51k
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqread-psync-multi 325(MiB/s) 81k
vtfs-none-spool seqread-psync-multi 271(MiB/s) 67k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqread-psync-multi 253(MiB/s) 63k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqread-psync-multi 349(MiB/s) 87k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqread-psync-multi 301(MiB/s) 75k
vtfs-none-epool seqread-libaio 301(MiB/s) 75k
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqread-libaio 273(MiB/s) 68k
vtfs-none-spool seqread-libaio 334(MiB/s) 83k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqread-libaio 315(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqread-libaio 326(MiB/s) 81k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqread-libaio 335(MiB/s) 83k
vtfs-none-epool seqread-libaio-multi 202(MiB/s) 50k
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqread-libaio-multi 308(MiB/s) 77k
vtfs-none-spool seqread-libaio-multi 247(MiB/s) 61k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqread-libaio-multi 238(MiB/s) 59k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqread-libaio-multi 307(MiB/s) 76k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqread-libaio-multi 269(MiB/s) 67k
vtfs-none-epool randread-psync 41(MiB/s) 10k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randread-psync 67(MiB/s) 16k
vtfs-none-spool randread-psync 64(MiB/s) 16k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randread-psync 48(MiB/s) 12k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randread-psync 73(MiB/s) 18k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randread-psync 72(MiB/s) 18k
vtfs-none-epool randread-psync-multi 207(MiB/s) 51k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randread-psync-multi 313(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-spool randread-psync-multi 265(MiB/s) 66k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randread-psync-multi 253(MiB/s) 63k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randread-psync-multi 340(MiB/s) 85k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randread-psync-multi 305(MiB/s) 76k
vtfs-none-epool randread-libaio 305(MiB/s) 76k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randread-libaio 308(MiB/s) 77k
vtfs-none-spool randread-libaio 329(MiB/s) 82k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randread-libaio 310(MiB/s) 77k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randread-libaio 328(MiB/s) 82k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randread-libaio 339(MiB/s) 84k
vtfs-none-epool randread-libaio-multi 265(MiB/s) 66k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randread-libaio-multi 267(MiB/s) 66k
vtfs-none-spool randread-libaio-multi 269(MiB/s) 67k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randread-libaio-multi 314(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randread-libaio-multi 319(MiB/s) 79k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randread-libaio-multi 318(MiB/s) 79k
vtfs-none-epool seqwrite-psync 36(MiB/s) 9224
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqwrite-psync 67(MiB/s) 16k
vtfs-none-spool seqwrite-psync 61(MiB/s) 15k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqwrite-psync 44(MiB/s) 11k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqwrite-psync 69(MiB/s) 17k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqwrite-psync 68(MiB/s) 17k
vtfs-none-epool seqwrite-psync-multi 193(MiB/s) 48k
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqwrite-psync-multi 299(MiB/s) 74k
vtfs-none-spool seqwrite-psync-multi 240(MiB/s) 60k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqwrite-psync-multi 233(MiB/s) 58k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqwrite-psync-multi 358(MiB/s) 89k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqwrite-psync-multi 285(MiB/s) 71k
vtfs-none-epool seqwrite-libaio 265(MiB/s) 66k
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqwrite-libaio 245(MiB/s) 61k
vtfs-none-spool seqwrite-libaio 312(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqwrite-libaio 295(MiB/s) 73k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqwrite-libaio 282(MiB/s) 70k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqwrite-libaio 297(MiB/s) 74k
vtfs-none-epool seqwrite-libaio-multi 313(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqwrite-libaio-multi 299(MiB/s) 74k
vtfs-none-spool seqwrite-libaio-multi 315(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqwrite-libaio-multi 318(MiB/s) 79k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqwrite-libaio-multi 410(MiB/s) 102k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqwrite-libaio-multi 378(MiB/s) 94k
vtfs-none-epool randwrite-psync 33(MiB/s) 8629
vtfs-none-epool-1T randwrite-psync 61(MiB/s) 15k
vtfs-none-spool randwrite-psync 63(MiB/s) 15k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randwrite-psync 49(MiB/s) 12k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randwrite-psync 68(MiB/s) 17k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randwrite-psync 66(MiB/s) 16k
vtfs-none-epool randwrite-psync-multi 186(MiB/s) 46k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randwrite-psync-multi 300(MiB/s) 75k
vtfs-none-spool randwrite-psync-multi 233(MiB/s) 58k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randwrite-psync-multi 235(MiB/s) 58k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randwrite-psync-multi 355(MiB/s) 88k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randwrite-psync-multi 266(MiB/s) 66k
vtfs-none-epool randwrite-libaio 289(MiB/s) 72k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randwrite-libaio 284(MiB/s) 71k
vtfs-none-spool randwrite-libaio 278(MiB/s) 69k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randwrite-libaio 292(MiB/s) 73k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randwrite-libaio 294(MiB/s) 73k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randwrite-libaio 290(MiB/s) 72k
vtfs-none-epool randwrite-libaio-multi 317(MiB/s) 79k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randwrite-libaio-multi 323(MiB/s) 80k
vtfs-none-spool randwrite-libaio-multi 330(MiB/s) 82k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randwrite-libaio-multi 315(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randwrite-libaio-multi 409(MiB/s) 102k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randwrite-libaio-multi 384(MiB/s) 96k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: tools/virtiofs: Multi threading seems to hurt performance
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:56:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200922225602.GJ57620@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922110946.GB2836@work-vm>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:09:46PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>
> Do you have the numbers for:
> epool
> epool thread-pool-size=1
> spool
Hi David,
Ok, I re-ran my numbers again after upgrading to latest qemu and also
upgraded host kernel to latest upstream. Apart from comparing I epool,
spool and 1Thread, I also ran their numa variants. That is I launched
qemu and virtiofsd on node 0 of machine (numactl --cpunodebind=0).
Results are kind of mixed. Here are my takeaways.
- Running on same numa node improves performance overall for exclusive,
shared and exclusive-1T mode.
- In general both shared pool and exclusive-1T mode seem to perform
better than exclusive mode, except for the case of randwrite-libaio.
In some cases (seqread-libaio, seqwrite-libaio, seqwrite-libaio-multi)
exclusive pool performs better than exclusive-1T.
- Looks like in some cases exclusive-1T performs better than shared
pool. (randwrite-libaio, randwrite-psync-multi, seqwrite-psync-multi,
seqwrite-psync, seqread-libaio-multi, seqread-psync-multi)
Overall, I feel that both exlusive-1T and shared perform better than
exclusive pool. Results between exclusive-1T and shared pool are mixed.
It seems like in many cases exclusve-1T performs better. I would say
that moving to "shared" pool seems like a reasonable option.
Thanks
Vivek
NAME WORKLOAD Bandwidth IOPS
vtfs-none-epool seqread-psync 38(MiB/s) 9967
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqread-psync 66(MiB/s) 16k
vtfs-none-spool seqread-psync 67(MiB/s) 16k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqread-psync 48(MiB/s) 12k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqread-psync 74(MiB/s) 18k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqread-psync 74(MiB/s) 18k
vtfs-none-epool seqread-psync-multi 204(MiB/s) 51k
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqread-psync-multi 325(MiB/s) 81k
vtfs-none-spool seqread-psync-multi 271(MiB/s) 67k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqread-psync-multi 253(MiB/s) 63k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqread-psync-multi 349(MiB/s) 87k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqread-psync-multi 301(MiB/s) 75k
vtfs-none-epool seqread-libaio 301(MiB/s) 75k
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqread-libaio 273(MiB/s) 68k
vtfs-none-spool seqread-libaio 334(MiB/s) 83k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqread-libaio 315(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqread-libaio 326(MiB/s) 81k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqread-libaio 335(MiB/s) 83k
vtfs-none-epool seqread-libaio-multi 202(MiB/s) 50k
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqread-libaio-multi 308(MiB/s) 77k
vtfs-none-spool seqread-libaio-multi 247(MiB/s) 61k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqread-libaio-multi 238(MiB/s) 59k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqread-libaio-multi 307(MiB/s) 76k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqread-libaio-multi 269(MiB/s) 67k
vtfs-none-epool randread-psync 41(MiB/s) 10k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randread-psync 67(MiB/s) 16k
vtfs-none-spool randread-psync 64(MiB/s) 16k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randread-psync 48(MiB/s) 12k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randread-psync 73(MiB/s) 18k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randread-psync 72(MiB/s) 18k
vtfs-none-epool randread-psync-multi 207(MiB/s) 51k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randread-psync-multi 313(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-spool randread-psync-multi 265(MiB/s) 66k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randread-psync-multi 253(MiB/s) 63k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randread-psync-multi 340(MiB/s) 85k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randread-psync-multi 305(MiB/s) 76k
vtfs-none-epool randread-libaio 305(MiB/s) 76k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randread-libaio 308(MiB/s) 77k
vtfs-none-spool randread-libaio 329(MiB/s) 82k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randread-libaio 310(MiB/s) 77k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randread-libaio 328(MiB/s) 82k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randread-libaio 339(MiB/s) 84k
vtfs-none-epool randread-libaio-multi 265(MiB/s) 66k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randread-libaio-multi 267(MiB/s) 66k
vtfs-none-spool randread-libaio-multi 269(MiB/s) 67k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randread-libaio-multi 314(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randread-libaio-multi 319(MiB/s) 79k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randread-libaio-multi 318(MiB/s) 79k
vtfs-none-epool seqwrite-psync 36(MiB/s) 9224
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqwrite-psync 67(MiB/s) 16k
vtfs-none-spool seqwrite-psync 61(MiB/s) 15k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqwrite-psync 44(MiB/s) 11k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqwrite-psync 69(MiB/s) 17k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqwrite-psync 68(MiB/s) 17k
vtfs-none-epool seqwrite-psync-multi 193(MiB/s) 48k
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqwrite-psync-multi 299(MiB/s) 74k
vtfs-none-spool seqwrite-psync-multi 240(MiB/s) 60k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqwrite-psync-multi 233(MiB/s) 58k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqwrite-psync-multi 358(MiB/s) 89k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqwrite-psync-multi 285(MiB/s) 71k
vtfs-none-epool seqwrite-libaio 265(MiB/s) 66k
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqwrite-libaio 245(MiB/s) 61k
vtfs-none-spool seqwrite-libaio 312(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqwrite-libaio 295(MiB/s) 73k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqwrite-libaio 282(MiB/s) 70k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqwrite-libaio 297(MiB/s) 74k
vtfs-none-epool seqwrite-libaio-multi 313(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-epool-1T seqwrite-libaio-multi 299(MiB/s) 74k
vtfs-none-spool seqwrite-libaio-multi 315(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-epool-numa seqwrite-libaio-multi 318(MiB/s) 79k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa seqwrite-libaio-multi 410(MiB/s) 102k
vtfs-none-spool-numa seqwrite-libaio-multi 378(MiB/s) 94k
vtfs-none-epool randwrite-psync 33(MiB/s) 8629
vtfs-none-epool-1T randwrite-psync 61(MiB/s) 15k
vtfs-none-spool randwrite-psync 63(MiB/s) 15k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randwrite-psync 49(MiB/s) 12k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randwrite-psync 68(MiB/s) 17k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randwrite-psync 66(MiB/s) 16k
vtfs-none-epool randwrite-psync-multi 186(MiB/s) 46k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randwrite-psync-multi 300(MiB/s) 75k
vtfs-none-spool randwrite-psync-multi 233(MiB/s) 58k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randwrite-psync-multi 235(MiB/s) 58k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randwrite-psync-multi 355(MiB/s) 88k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randwrite-psync-multi 266(MiB/s) 66k
vtfs-none-epool randwrite-libaio 289(MiB/s) 72k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randwrite-libaio 284(MiB/s) 71k
vtfs-none-spool randwrite-libaio 278(MiB/s) 69k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randwrite-libaio 292(MiB/s) 73k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randwrite-libaio 294(MiB/s) 73k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randwrite-libaio 290(MiB/s) 72k
vtfs-none-epool randwrite-libaio-multi 317(MiB/s) 79k
vtfs-none-epool-1T randwrite-libaio-multi 323(MiB/s) 80k
vtfs-none-spool randwrite-libaio-multi 330(MiB/s) 82k
vtfs-none-epool-numa randwrite-libaio-multi 315(MiB/s) 78k
vtfs-none-epool-1T-numa randwrite-libaio-multi 409(MiB/s) 102k
vtfs-none-spool-numa randwrite-libaio-multi 384(MiB/s) 96k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-22 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-18 21:34 [Virtio-fs] tools/virtiofs: Multi threading seems to hurt performance Vivek Goyal
2020-09-18 21:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21 8:39 ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-09-21 8:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-09-21 13:39 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21 13:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21 16:57 ` [Virtio-fs] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-09-21 16:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-09-21 8:50 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-21 8:50 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-21 13:35 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21 13:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21 14:08 ` [Virtio-fs] " Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-21 14:08 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-21 15:32 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-21 15:32 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-22 10:25 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-22 10:25 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-22 17:47 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-22 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-24 21:33 ` [Virtio-fs] " Venegas Munoz, Jose Carlos
2020-09-24 21:33 ` Venegas Munoz, Jose Carlos
2020-09-24 22:10 ` [Virtio-fs] virtiofs vs 9p performance(Re: tools/virtiofs: Multi threading seems to hurt performance) Vivek Goyal
2020-09-24 22:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-25 8:06 ` [Virtio-fs] virtiofs vs 9p performance Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 8:06 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 13:13 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-25 13:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-25 15:47 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 15:47 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-19 16:08 ` [Virtio-fs] Can not set high msize with virtio-9p (Was: Re: virtiofs vs 9p performance) Vivek Goyal
2021-02-19 16:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-02-19 17:33 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-19 17:33 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-19 19:01 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-02-19 19:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-02-20 15:38 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-20 15:38 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-22 12:18 ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-02-22 12:18 ` Greg Kurz
2021-02-22 15:08 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-22 15:08 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-22 17:11 ` [Virtio-fs] " Greg Kurz
2021-02-22 17:11 ` Greg Kurz
2021-02-23 13:39 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-23 13:39 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-23 14:07 ` [Virtio-fs] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-23 14:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-02-24 15:16 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-24 15:16 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-24 15:43 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dominique Martinet
2021-02-24 15:43 ` Dominique Martinet
2021-02-26 13:49 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-26 13:49 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-02-27 0:03 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dominique Martinet
2021-02-27 0:03 ` Dominique Martinet
2021-03-03 14:04 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-03-03 14:04 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2021-03-03 14:50 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dominique Martinet
2021-03-03 14:50 ` Dominique Martinet
2021-03-05 14:57 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2021-03-05 14:57 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 12:41 ` [Virtio-fs] virtiofs vs 9p performance(Re: tools/virtiofs: Multi threading seems to hurt performance) Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 12:41 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 13:04 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 13:04 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 13:05 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 13:05 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 16:05 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 16:05 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 16:33 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 16:33 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-25 18:51 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 18:51 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-27 12:14 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-27 12:14 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-29 13:03 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 13:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 13:28 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-29 13:28 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-29 13:49 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 13:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 13:59 ` [Virtio-fs] " Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-29 13:59 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2020-09-29 13:17 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 13:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 13:49 ` [Virtio-fs] " Miklos Szeredi
2020-09-29 13:49 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-09-29 14:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 14:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 14:54 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-09-29 14:54 ` Miklos Szeredi
2020-09-29 15:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-29 15:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-25 12:11 ` [Virtio-fs] tools/virtiofs: Multi threading seems to hurt performance Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 12:11 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-25 13:11 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-25 13:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21 20:16 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2020-09-21 20:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-22 11:09 ` [Virtio-fs] " Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-22 11:09 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2020-09-22 22:56 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2020-09-22 22:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-23 12:50 ` [Virtio-fs] " Chirantan Ekbote
2020-09-23 12:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-09-25 11:35 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200922225602.GJ57620@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.