From: Jeremy Cline <jcline-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied-cv59FeDIM0c@public.gmane.org>,
nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: Add a dedicated mutex for the clients list
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:45:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201125194557.GC20747@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505be3af57c36222564d0790aa8a992b1ea4d287.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 01:37:06PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 14:49 -0500, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > Rather than protecting the nouveau_drm clients list with the lock within
> > the "client" nouveau_cli, add a dedicated lock to serialize access to
> > the list. This is both clearer and necessary to avoid lockdep being
> > upset with us when we need to iterate through all the clients in the
> > list and potentially lock their mutex, which is the same class as the
> > lock protecting the entire list.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 9 +++++----
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> > index 4fe4d664c5f2..d182b877258a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> > @@ -557,6 +557,7 @@ nouveau_drm_device_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > nvkm_dbgopt(nouveau_debug, "DRM");
> >
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drm->clients);
> > + mutex_init(&drm->clients_lock);
>
> Looks like you forgot to hook up mutex_destroy() somewhere. Note there's
> actually plenty of code in nouveau right now that forgets to do this, but at
> some point we should probably fix that and avoid adding more spots where there's
> no mutex_destroy().
>
I'm guilty of having looked at the existing locking init code in nouveau
and modeling this work accordingly. I'll send out a fix for this shortly
and look at tidying up the rest of the locks in a separate series.
Thanks!
> > spin_lock_init(&drm->tile.lock);
> >
> > /* workaround an odd issue on nvc1 by disabling the device's
> > @@ -1089,9 +1090,9 @@ nouveau_drm_open(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file
> > *fpriv)
> >
> > fpriv->driver_priv = cli;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&drm->client.mutex);
> > + mutex_lock(&drm->clients_lock);
> > list_add(&cli->head, &drm->clients);
> > - mutex_unlock(&drm->client.mutex);
> > + mutex_unlock(&drm->clients_lock);
> >
> > done:
> > if (ret && cli) {
> > @@ -1117,9 +1118,9 @@ nouveau_drm_postclose(struct drm_device *dev, struct
> > drm_file *fpriv)
> > nouveau_abi16_fini(cli->abi16);
> > mutex_unlock(&cli->mutex);
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&drm->client.mutex);
> > + mutex_lock(&drm->clients_lock);
> > list_del(&cli->head);
> > - mutex_unlock(&drm->client.mutex);
> > + mutex_unlock(&drm->clients_lock);
> >
> > nouveau_cli_fini(cli);
> > kfree(cli);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> > index 9d04d1b36434..550e5f335146 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> > @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ struct nouveau_drm {
> >
> > struct list_head clients;
> >
> > + /**
> > + * @clients_lock: Protects access to the @clients list of &struct
> > nouveau_cli.
> > + */
> > + struct mutex clients_lock;
> > +
> > u8 old_pm_cap;
> >
> > struct {
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> Lyude Paul (she/her)
> Software Engineer at Red Hat
>
> Note: I deal with a lot of emails and have a lot of bugs on my plate. If you've
> asked me a question, are waiting for a review/merge on a patch, etc. and I
> haven't responded in a while, please feel free to send me another email to check
> on my status. I don't bite!
>
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: Add a dedicated mutex for the clients list
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:45:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201125194557.GC20747@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505be3af57c36222564d0790aa8a992b1ea4d287.camel@redhat.com>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 01:37:06PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 14:49 -0500, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > Rather than protecting the nouveau_drm clients list with the lock within
> > the "client" nouveau_cli, add a dedicated lock to serialize access to
> > the list. This is both clearer and necessary to avoid lockdep being
> > upset with us when we need to iterate through all the clients in the
> > list and potentially lock their mutex, which is the same class as the
> > lock protecting the entire list.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 9 +++++----
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> > index 4fe4d664c5f2..d182b877258a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> > @@ -557,6 +557,7 @@ nouveau_drm_device_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > nvkm_dbgopt(nouveau_debug, "DRM");
> >
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drm->clients);
> > + mutex_init(&drm->clients_lock);
>
> Looks like you forgot to hook up mutex_destroy() somewhere. Note there's
> actually plenty of code in nouveau right now that forgets to do this, but at
> some point we should probably fix that and avoid adding more spots where there's
> no mutex_destroy().
>
I'm guilty of having looked at the existing locking init code in nouveau
and modeling this work accordingly. I'll send out a fix for this shortly
and look at tidying up the rest of the locks in a separate series.
Thanks!
> > spin_lock_init(&drm->tile.lock);
> >
> > /* workaround an odd issue on nvc1 by disabling the device's
> > @@ -1089,9 +1090,9 @@ nouveau_drm_open(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file
> > *fpriv)
> >
> > fpriv->driver_priv = cli;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&drm->client.mutex);
> > + mutex_lock(&drm->clients_lock);
> > list_add(&cli->head, &drm->clients);
> > - mutex_unlock(&drm->client.mutex);
> > + mutex_unlock(&drm->clients_lock);
> >
> > done:
> > if (ret && cli) {
> > @@ -1117,9 +1118,9 @@ nouveau_drm_postclose(struct drm_device *dev, struct
> > drm_file *fpriv)
> > nouveau_abi16_fini(cli->abi16);
> > mutex_unlock(&cli->mutex);
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&drm->client.mutex);
> > + mutex_lock(&drm->clients_lock);
> > list_del(&cli->head);
> > - mutex_unlock(&drm->client.mutex);
> > + mutex_unlock(&drm->clients_lock);
> >
> > nouveau_cli_fini(cli);
> > kfree(cli);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> > index 9d04d1b36434..550e5f335146 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> > @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ struct nouveau_drm {
> >
> > struct list_head clients;
> >
> > + /**
> > + * @clients_lock: Protects access to the @clients list of &struct
> > nouveau_cli.
> > + */
> > + struct mutex clients_lock;
> > +
> > u8 old_pm_cap;
> >
> > struct {
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> Lyude Paul (she/her)
> Software Engineer at Red Hat
>
> Note: I deal with a lot of emails and have a lot of bugs on my plate. If you've
> asked me a question, are waiting for a review/merge on a patch, etc. and I
> haven't responded in a while, please feel free to send me another email to check
> on my status. I don't bite!
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>
To: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: Add a dedicated mutex for the clients list
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 14:45:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201125194557.GC20747@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <505be3af57c36222564d0790aa8a992b1ea4d287.camel@redhat.com>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 01:37:06PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 14:49 -0500, Jeremy Cline wrote:
> > Rather than protecting the nouveau_drm clients list with the lock within
> > the "client" nouveau_cli, add a dedicated lock to serialize access to
> > the list. This is both clearer and necessary to avoid lockdep being
> > upset with us when we need to iterate through all the clients in the
> > list and potentially lock their mutex, which is the same class as the
> > lock protecting the entire list.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 9 +++++----
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> > index 4fe4d664c5f2..d182b877258a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
> > @@ -557,6 +557,7 @@ nouveau_drm_device_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > nvkm_dbgopt(nouveau_debug, "DRM");
> >
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drm->clients);
> > + mutex_init(&drm->clients_lock);
>
> Looks like you forgot to hook up mutex_destroy() somewhere. Note there's
> actually plenty of code in nouveau right now that forgets to do this, but at
> some point we should probably fix that and avoid adding more spots where there's
> no mutex_destroy().
>
I'm guilty of having looked at the existing locking init code in nouveau
and modeling this work accordingly. I'll send out a fix for this shortly
and look at tidying up the rest of the locks in a separate series.
Thanks!
> > spin_lock_init(&drm->tile.lock);
> >
> > /* workaround an odd issue on nvc1 by disabling the device's
> > @@ -1089,9 +1090,9 @@ nouveau_drm_open(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file
> > *fpriv)
> >
> > fpriv->driver_priv = cli;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&drm->client.mutex);
> > + mutex_lock(&drm->clients_lock);
> > list_add(&cli->head, &drm->clients);
> > - mutex_unlock(&drm->client.mutex);
> > + mutex_unlock(&drm->clients_lock);
> >
> > done:
> > if (ret && cli) {
> > @@ -1117,9 +1118,9 @@ nouveau_drm_postclose(struct drm_device *dev, struct
> > drm_file *fpriv)
> > nouveau_abi16_fini(cli->abi16);
> > mutex_unlock(&cli->mutex);
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&drm->client.mutex);
> > + mutex_lock(&drm->clients_lock);
> > list_del(&cli->head);
> > - mutex_unlock(&drm->client.mutex);
> > + mutex_unlock(&drm->clients_lock);
> >
> > nouveau_cli_fini(cli);
> > kfree(cli);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> > index 9d04d1b36434..550e5f335146 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> > @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ struct nouveau_drm {
> >
> > struct list_head clients;
> >
> > + /**
> > + * @clients_lock: Protects access to the @clients list of &struct
> > nouveau_cli.
> > + */
> > + struct mutex clients_lock;
> > +
> > u8 old_pm_cap;
> >
> > struct {
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> Lyude Paul (she/her)
> Software Engineer at Red Hat
>
> Note: I deal with a lot of emails and have a lot of bugs on my plate. If you've
> asked me a question, are waiting for a review/merge on a patch, etc. and I
> haven't responded in a while, please feel free to send me another email to check
> on my status. I don't bite!
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-25 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-03 19:49 [PATCH 0/3] drm/nouveau: fix a use-after-free in postclose() Jeremy Cline
2020-11-03 19:49 ` Jeremy Cline
2020-11-03 19:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/nouveau: use drm_dev_unplug() during device removal Jeremy Cline
2020-11-03 19:49 ` Jeremy Cline
2020-11-03 19:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: Add a dedicated mutex for the clients list Jeremy Cline
2020-11-03 19:49 ` Jeremy Cline
[not found] ` <20201103194912.184413-3-jcline-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2020-11-25 18:37 ` Lyude Paul
2020-11-25 18:37 ` Lyude Paul
2020-11-25 18:37 ` Lyude Paul
[not found] ` <505be3af57c36222564d0790aa8a992b1ea4d287.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2020-11-25 19:45 ` Jeremy Cline [this message]
2020-11-25 19:45 ` Jeremy Cline
2020-11-25 19:45 ` Jeremy Cline
2020-11-03 19:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/nouveau: clean up all clients on device removal Jeremy Cline
2020-11-03 19:49 ` Jeremy Cline
[not found] ` <20201103194912.184413-4-jcline-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2020-11-25 18:44 ` Lyude Paul
2020-11-25 18:44 ` Lyude Paul
2020-11-25 18:44 ` Lyude Paul
[not found] ` <20201103194912.184413-1-jcline-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2020-11-25 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/nouveau: fix a use-after-free in postclose() Jeremy Cline
2020-11-25 20:26 ` Jeremy Cline
2020-11-25 20:26 ` Jeremy Cline
[not found] ` <20201125202648.5220-1-jcline-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2020-11-25 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/nouveau: use drm_dev_unplug() during device removal Jeremy Cline
2020-11-25 20:26 ` Jeremy Cline
2020-11-25 20:26 ` Jeremy Cline
2020-11-25 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/nouveau: Add a dedicated mutex for the clients list Jeremy Cline
2020-11-25 20:26 ` Jeremy Cline
2020-11-25 20:26 ` Jeremy Cline
2020-11-25 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/nouveau: clean up all clients on device removal Jeremy Cline
2020-11-25 20:26 ` Jeremy Cline
2020-11-25 20:26 ` Jeremy Cline
2021-03-26 22:00 ` [Nouveau] [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/nouveau: fix a use-after-free in postclose() Lyude Paul
2021-03-26 22:00 ` Lyude Paul
2021-03-26 22:00 ` Lyude Paul
2021-08-16 7:03 ` [Nouveau] " Salvatore Bonaccorso
2021-08-16 7:03 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2021-08-17 20:32 ` [Nouveau] " Lyude Paul
2021-08-17 20:32 ` Lyude Paul
2021-10-11 7:05 ` [Nouveau] " Salvatore Bonaccorso
2021-10-11 7:05 ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2021-10-11 11:05 ` [Nouveau] " Karol Herbst
2021-10-11 11:05 ` Karol Herbst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201125194557.GC20747@xps13 \
--to=jcline-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=airlied-cv59FeDIM0c@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bskeggs-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dri-devel-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lyude-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.