All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Peter Puhov <peter.puhov@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 0/2] cpufreq: cppc: Add support for frequency invariance
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 19:50:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201216195003.GA21585@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1608030508.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Hi,

On Tuesday 15 Dec 2020 at 16:46:34 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> CPPC cpufreq driver is used for ARM servers and this patch series tries
> to provide frequency invariance support for them.
> 

Nitpick: cppc_cpufreq already supports cpufreq-based frequency
invariance, but not counter-based frequency invariance, when lacking
AMUs :).

> This is tested with some hacks, as I didn't have access to the right
> hardware, on the ARM64 hikey board to check the overall functionality
> and that works fine.
> 
> Ionela/Peter Puhov, it would be nice if you guys can give this a shot.
> 

I'll be on holiday starting tomorrow until January. I fully intend to
review and test this but I'll have to set myself a deadline for January
to do it.

Sorry for the delay,
Ionela.

> This is based of pm/linux-next and patches [1] and [2] which I sent
> recently to cleanup arm64 topology stuff.
> 
> Changes since V1:
> - The interface for setting the callbacks is improved, so different
>   parts looking to provide their callbacks don't need to think about
>   each other.
> 
> - Moved to per-cpu storage for storing the callback related data, AMU
>   counters have higher priority with this.
> 
> --
> viresh
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7a171f710cdc0f808a2bfbd7db839c0d265527e7.1607579234.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5ffc7b9ed03c6301ac2f710f609282959491b526.1608010334.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/
> 
> Viresh Kumar (2):
>   topology: Allow multiple entities to provide sched_freq_tick()
>     callback
>   cpufreq: cppc: Add support for frequency invariance
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h |   8 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c      |  89 +++++++++----------
>  drivers/base/arch_topology.c      |  56 +++++++++++-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c    | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/arch_topology.h     |  14 ++-
>  kernel/sched/core.c               |   1 +
>  6 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Puhov <peter.puhov@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 0/2] cpufreq: cppc: Add support for frequency invariance
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 19:50:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201216195003.GA21585@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1608030508.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Hi,

On Tuesday 15 Dec 2020 at 16:46:34 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> CPPC cpufreq driver is used for ARM servers and this patch series tries
> to provide frequency invariance support for them.
> 

Nitpick: cppc_cpufreq already supports cpufreq-based frequency
invariance, but not counter-based frequency invariance, when lacking
AMUs :).

> This is tested with some hacks, as I didn't have access to the right
> hardware, on the ARM64 hikey board to check the overall functionality
> and that works fine.
> 
> Ionela/Peter Puhov, it would be nice if you guys can give this a shot.
> 

I'll be on holiday starting tomorrow until January. I fully intend to
review and test this but I'll have to set myself a deadline for January
to do it.

Sorry for the delay,
Ionela.

> This is based of pm/linux-next and patches [1] and [2] which I sent
> recently to cleanup arm64 topology stuff.
> 
> Changes since V1:
> - The interface for setting the callbacks is improved, so different
>   parts looking to provide their callbacks don't need to think about
>   each other.
> 
> - Moved to per-cpu storage for storing the callback related data, AMU
>   counters have higher priority with this.
> 
> --
> viresh
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7a171f710cdc0f808a2bfbd7db839c0d265527e7.1607579234.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5ffc7b9ed03c6301ac2f710f609282959491b526.1608010334.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/
> 
> Viresh Kumar (2):
>   topology: Allow multiple entities to provide sched_freq_tick()
>     callback
>   cpufreq: cppc: Add support for frequency invariance
> 
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h |   8 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c      |  89 +++++++++----------
>  drivers/base/arch_topology.c      |  56 +++++++++++-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c    | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/arch_topology.h     |  14 ++-
>  kernel/sched/core.c               |   1 +
>  6 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-16 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-15 11:16 [RFC V2 0/2] cpufreq: cppc: Add support for frequency invariance Viresh Kumar
2020-12-15 11:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-12-15 11:16 ` [RFC V2 1/2] topology: Allow multiple entities to provide sched_freq_tick() callback Viresh Kumar
2020-12-15 11:16   ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-13 16:18   ` Ionela Voinescu
2021-01-13 16:18     ` Ionela Voinescu
2021-01-15  7:48     ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-15  7:48       ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-19 19:05       ` Ionela Voinescu
2021-01-19 19:05         ` Ionela Voinescu
2021-01-22  7:44         ` Viresh Kumar
2021-01-22  7:44           ` Viresh Kumar
2020-12-15 11:16 ` [RFC V2 2/2] cpufreq: cppc: Add support for frequency invariance Viresh Kumar
2021-01-19 19:17   ` Ionela Voinescu
2021-01-22  9:02     ` Viresh Kumar
2020-12-16 19:50 ` Ionela Voinescu [this message]
2020-12-16 19:50   ` [RFC V2 0/2] " Ionela Voinescu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201216195003.GA21585@arm.com \
    --to=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.puhov@linaro.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.