From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Are AER corrected errors worrying?
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 21:12:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210104201247.5k47gueib3cw4sfr@function> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210104184435.GE1024941@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com>
Hello,
Vidya Sagar wrote:
> Since this is a laptop, I'm suspecting that ASPM states might have
> been enabled which could be causing these errors.
Keith Busch, le lun. 04 janv. 2021 10:44:35 -0800, a ecrit:
> Sometimes these types of errors occur from low power settings, so you
> can try disabling the automatic management of these (assuming the
> hardware supports it). To disable nvme specific power state transitions,
> the kernel parameter is "nvme_core.default_ps_max_latency_us=0".
I have tried to add it, and this one line changed in lspci -vv:
02:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Sandisk Corp WD Black SN750 / PC SN730 NVMe SSD (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
[...]
Capabilities: [c0] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00
[...]
DevSta: CorrErr- NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq- AuxPwr- TransPend-
turned to
DevSta: CorrErr+ NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq+ AuxPwr- TransPend-
that last value happens to be what I was seeing for that line with the
manufacturer-provided ubuntu linux kernel.
So far (30m uptime) no corrected error report, I'll watch in the coming
hours/days to see if that avoided the issue. I wasn't able to trigger
such corrected errors by loading the machine, so possibly that's indeed
the converse that I should have been trying: letting it go low power :)
> PCI also has automatic link power savings that you can disable with
> parameter "pcie_aspm=off".
I'll try that if I still see errors with the nvme_core parameter.
Samuel
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Are AER corrected errors worrying?
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 21:12:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210104201247.5k47gueib3cw4sfr@function> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210104184435.GE1024941@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com>
Hello,
Vidya Sagar wrote:
> Since this is a laptop, I'm suspecting that ASPM states might have
> been enabled which could be causing these errors.
Keith Busch, le lun. 04 janv. 2021 10:44:35 -0800, a ecrit:
> Sometimes these types of errors occur from low power settings, so you
> can try disabling the automatic management of these (assuming the
> hardware supports it). To disable nvme specific power state transitions,
> the kernel parameter is "nvme_core.default_ps_max_latency_us=0".
I have tried to add it, and this one line changed in lspci -vv:
02:00.0 Non-Volatile memory controller: Sandisk Corp WD Black SN750 / PC SN730 NVMe SSD (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
[...]
Capabilities: [c0] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00
[...]
DevSta: CorrErr- NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq- AuxPwr- TransPend-
turned to
DevSta: CorrErr+ NonFatalErr- FatalErr- UnsupReq+ AuxPwr- TransPend-
that last value happens to be what I was seeing for that line with the
manufacturer-provided ubuntu linux kernel.
So far (30m uptime) no corrected error report, I'll watch in the coming
hours/days to see if that avoided the issue. I wasn't able to trigger
such corrected errors by loading the machine, so possibly that's indeed
the converse that I should have been trying: letting it go low power :)
> PCI also has automatic link power savings that you can disable with
> parameter "pcie_aspm=off".
I'll try that if I still see errors with the nvme_core parameter.
Samuel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-01 22:40 Are AER corrected errors worrying? Samuel Thibault
2021-01-04 18:44 ` Keith Busch
2021-01-04 20:12 ` Samuel Thibault [this message]
2021-01-04 20:12 ` Samuel Thibault
2021-01-04 21:36 ` Samuel Thibault
2021-01-04 21:36 ` Samuel Thibault
2021-01-04 22:33 ` Samuel Thibault
2021-01-04 22:33 ` Samuel Thibault
2021-01-06 20:28 ` Samuel Thibault
2021-01-06 20:28 ` Samuel Thibault
2021-01-06 21:48 ` Keith Busch
2021-01-06 21:48 ` Keith Busch
2021-01-06 22:40 ` Samuel Thibault
2021-01-06 22:40 ` Samuel Thibault
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-02 17:03 Samuel Thibault
2021-01-03 6:45 ` Vidya Sagar
2021-01-03 11:25 ` Samuel Thibault
2021-01-03 13:48 ` Samuel Thibault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210104201247.5k47gueib3cw4sfr@function \
--to=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.