All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: vigneshr@ti.com, richard@nod.at, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	boris.brezillon@collabora.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, sricharan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:53:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114165325.3d510355@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1610251305-20792-1-git-send-email-mdalam@codeaurora.org>

Hello,

Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org> wrote on Sun, 10 Jan 2021
09:31:45 +0530:

> From QPIC version 2.0 onwards new register got added to

                                a

> read last codeword. This change will update the same.

       the?           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                      Please reword this sentence.

> For first three code word READ_LOCATION_n register will be
> use.For last code word READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n register will be
> use.

"For the first three codewords, READ_LOCATION_n registers will be used.
The last codeword register will be accessed through
READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n."

Also, please specify what these registers store.

> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org>

Could someone please test this patch?

> ---
> [V3]
>  * Added else condition for last code word in update_rw_regs().
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 667e4bf..50ff6e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
>  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_1		0xf24
>  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_2		0xf28
>  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_3		0xf2c
> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0	0xf40
> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1	0xf44
> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2	0xf48
> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3	0xf4c
>  
>  /* dummy register offsets, used by write_reg_dma */
>  #define	NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE		0xdead
> @@ -187,6 +191,12 @@ nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_##reg,			\
>  	      ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) |			\
>  	      ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
>  
> +#define nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last)	\
> +nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_##reg,			\
> +	      ((offset) << READ_LOCATION_OFFSET) |		\
> +	      ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) |			\
> +	      ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
> +
>  /*
>   * Returns the actual register address for all NAND_DEV_ registers
>   * (i.e. NAND_DEV_CMD0, NAND_DEV_CMD1, NAND_DEV_CMD2 and NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD)
> @@ -316,6 +326,10 @@ struct nandc_regs {
>  	__le32 read_location1;
>  	__le32 read_location2;
>  	__le32 read_location3;
> +	__le32 read_location_last0;
> +	__le32 read_location_last1;
> +	__le32 read_location_last2;
> +	__le32 read_location_last3;
>  
>  	__le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_clr;
>  	__le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_set;
> @@ -644,6 +658,14 @@ static __le32 *offset_to_nandc_reg(struct nandc_regs *regs, int offset)
>  		return &regs->read_location2;
>  	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_3:
>  		return &regs->read_location3;
> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0:
> +		return &regs->read_location_last0;
> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1:
> +		return &regs->read_location_last1;
> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2:
> +		return &regs->read_location_last2;
> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3:
> +		return &regs->read_location_last3;
>  	default:
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
> @@ -719,9 +741,14 @@ static void update_rw_regs(struct qcom_nand_host *host, int num_cw, bool read)
>  	nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_STATUS, host->clrreadstatus);
>  	nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1);
>  
> -	if (read)
> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
> -				   host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
> +	if (read) {
> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
> +					host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
> +		else
> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
> +					host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1096,9 +1123,13 @@ static void config_nand_page_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
>  static void
>  config_nand_cw_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc)
>  {
> -	if (nandc->props->is_bam)
> +	if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> +			write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0,
> +				      1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>  		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
>  			      NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> +	}
>  
>  	write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>  	write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> @@ -1633,16 +1664,28 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
> +		else
> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);

You repeat many times this logic, a helper to avoid this extra
indentation level with the if/else block is needed.

>  		read_loc += data_size1;
>  
> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
> +		else
> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
>  		read_loc += oob_size1;
>  
> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
> +		else
> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
>  		read_loc += data_size2;
>  
> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 0);
> +		else
> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
>  	}

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, richard@nod.at,
	vigneshr@ti.com, boris.brezillon@collabora.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sricharan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:53:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114165325.3d510355@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1610251305-20792-1-git-send-email-mdalam@codeaurora.org>

Hello,

Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org> wrote on Sun, 10 Jan 2021
09:31:45 +0530:

> From QPIC version 2.0 onwards new register got added to

                                a

> read last codeword. This change will update the same.

       the?           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                      Please reword this sentence.

> For first three code word READ_LOCATION_n register will be
> use.For last code word READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n register will be
> use.

"For the first three codewords, READ_LOCATION_n registers will be used.
The last codeword register will be accessed through
READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n."

Also, please specify what these registers store.

> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org>

Could someone please test this patch?

> ---
> [V3]
>  * Added else condition for last code word in update_rw_regs().
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 667e4bf..50ff6e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
>  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_1		0xf24
>  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_2		0xf28
>  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_3		0xf2c
> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0	0xf40
> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1	0xf44
> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2	0xf48
> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3	0xf4c
>  
>  /* dummy register offsets, used by write_reg_dma */
>  #define	NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE		0xdead
> @@ -187,6 +191,12 @@ nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_##reg,			\
>  	      ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) |			\
>  	      ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
>  
> +#define nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last)	\
> +nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_##reg,			\
> +	      ((offset) << READ_LOCATION_OFFSET) |		\
> +	      ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) |			\
> +	      ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
> +
>  /*
>   * Returns the actual register address for all NAND_DEV_ registers
>   * (i.e. NAND_DEV_CMD0, NAND_DEV_CMD1, NAND_DEV_CMD2 and NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD)
> @@ -316,6 +326,10 @@ struct nandc_regs {
>  	__le32 read_location1;
>  	__le32 read_location2;
>  	__le32 read_location3;
> +	__le32 read_location_last0;
> +	__le32 read_location_last1;
> +	__le32 read_location_last2;
> +	__le32 read_location_last3;
>  
>  	__le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_clr;
>  	__le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_set;
> @@ -644,6 +658,14 @@ static __le32 *offset_to_nandc_reg(struct nandc_regs *regs, int offset)
>  		return &regs->read_location2;
>  	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_3:
>  		return &regs->read_location3;
> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0:
> +		return &regs->read_location_last0;
> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1:
> +		return &regs->read_location_last1;
> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2:
> +		return &regs->read_location_last2;
> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3:
> +		return &regs->read_location_last3;
>  	default:
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
> @@ -719,9 +741,14 @@ static void update_rw_regs(struct qcom_nand_host *host, int num_cw, bool read)
>  	nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_STATUS, host->clrreadstatus);
>  	nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1);
>  
> -	if (read)
> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
> -				   host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
> +	if (read) {
> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
> +					host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
> +		else
> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
> +					host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1096,9 +1123,13 @@ static void config_nand_page_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
>  static void
>  config_nand_cw_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc)
>  {
> -	if (nandc->props->is_bam)
> +	if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> +			write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0,
> +				      1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>  		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
>  			      NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> +	}
>  
>  	write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>  	write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> @@ -1633,16 +1664,28 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
> +		else
> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);

You repeat many times this logic, a helper to avoid this extra
indentation level with the if/else block is needed.

>  		read_loc += data_size1;
>  
> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
> +		else
> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
>  		read_loc += oob_size1;
>  
> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
> +		else
> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
>  		read_loc += data_size2;
>  
> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 0);
> +		else
> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
>  	}

Thanks,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-14 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-10  4:01 [PATCH V3] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register Md Sadre Alam
2021-01-10  4:01 ` Md Sadre Alam
2021-01-14 15:53 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2021-01-14 15:53   ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-14 16:31   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-01-14 16:31     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-01-14 16:42     ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-14 16:42       ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-28 21:48   ` mdalam
2021-01-28 21:48     ` mdalam
2021-01-28 22:11     ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-28 22:11       ` Miquel Raynal
2021-01-29  5:05       ` mdalam
2021-01-29  5:05         ` mdalam
2021-01-28  7:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-01-28  7:52   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-01-29  5:11   ` mdalam
2021-01-29  5:11     ` mdalam
2021-02-05 17:53     ` mdalam
2021-02-05 17:53       ` mdalam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210114165325.3d510355@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=mdalam@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.