All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
Cc: "Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
	"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Edgar Bernardi Righi" <edgar.righi@lsitec.org.br>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-actions@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] clk: actions: Fix bisp_factor_table based clocks on Owl S500 SoC
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:47:39 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210316041739.GC1798@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13576ddb604a9097603d95cd2605275c20fb2f56.1615221459.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 07:18:28PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> The following clocks of the Actions Semi Owl S500 SoC have been defined
> to use a shared clock factor table 'bisp_factor_table[]': DE[1-2], VCE,
> VDE, BISP, SENSOR[0-1]
> 
> There are several issues involved in this approach:
> 
> * 'bisp_factor_table[]' describes the configuration of a regular 8-rates
>   divider, so its usage is redundant. Additionally, judging by the BISP
>   clock context, it is incomplete since it maps only 8 out of 12
>   possible entries.
> 
> * The clocks mentioned above are not identical in terms of the available
>   rates, therefore cannot rely on the same factor table. Specifically,
>   BISP and SENSOR* are standard 12-rate dividers so their configuration
>   should rely on a proper clock div table, while VCE and VDE require a
>   factor table that is a actually a subset of the one needed for DE[1-2]
>   clocks.
> 
> Let's fix this by implementing the following:
> 
> * Add new factor tables 'de_factor_table' and 'hde_factor_table' to
>   properly handle DE[1-2], VCE and VDE clocks.
> 
> * Add a common div table 'std12rate_div_table' for BISP and SENSOR[0-1]
>   clocks converted to OWL_COMP_DIV.
> 
> * Drop the now unused 'bisp_factor_table[]'.
> 

Nice!

> Additionally, since SENSOR[0-1] are not gated, unset the OWL_GATE_HW
> configuration and drop the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag in their definitions.
> 

No. You should not screen the functionality exposed by the hw, that's what the
purpose of these CLK_ flags.

Other than that, this patch looks good to me.

> Fixes: ed6b4795ece4 ("clk: actions: Add clock driver for S500 SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c
> index 69cd959205f5..abe8874353de 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c
> @@ -138,9 +138,16 @@ static struct clk_factor_table sd_factor_table[] = {
>  	{ 0, 0, 0 },
>  };
>  
> -static struct clk_factor_table bisp_factor_table[] = {
> -	{ 0, 1, 1 }, { 1, 1, 2 }, { 2, 1, 3 }, { 3, 1, 4 },
> -	{ 4, 1, 5 }, { 5, 1, 6 }, { 6, 1, 7 }, { 7, 1, 8 },
> +static struct clk_factor_table de_factor_table[] = {
> +	{ 0, 1, 1 }, { 1, 2, 3 }, { 2, 1, 2 }, { 3, 2, 5 },
> +	{ 4, 1, 3 }, { 5, 1, 4 }, { 6, 1, 6 }, { 7, 1, 8 },
> +	{ 8, 1, 12 },
> +	{ 0, 0, 0 },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_factor_table hde_factor_table[] = {
> +	{ 0, 1, 1 }, { 1, 2, 3 }, { 2, 1, 2 }, { 3, 2, 5 },
> +	{ 4, 1, 3 }, { 5, 1, 4 }, { 6, 1, 6 }, { 7, 1, 8 },
>  	{ 0, 0, 0 },
>  };
>  
> @@ -154,6 +161,13 @@ static struct clk_div_table rmii_ref_div_table[] = {
>  	{ 0, 0 },
>  };
>  
> +static struct clk_div_table std12rate_div_table[] = {
> +	{ 0, 1 }, { 1, 2 }, { 2, 3 }, { 3, 4 },
> +	{ 4, 5 }, { 5, 6 }, { 6, 7 }, { 7, 8 },
> +	{ 8, 9 }, { 9, 10 }, { 10, 11 }, { 11, 12 },
> +	{ 0, 0 },
> +};
> +
>  static struct clk_div_table i2s_div_table[] = {
>  	{ 0, 1 }, { 1, 2 }, { 2, 3 }, { 3, 4 },
>  	{ 4, 6 }, { 5, 8 }, { 6, 12 }, { 7, 16 },
> @@ -189,39 +203,39 @@ static OWL_DIVIDER(rmii_ref_clk, "rmii_ref_clk", "ethernet_pll_clk", CMU_ETHERNE
>  
>  /* factor clocks */
>  static OWL_FACTOR(ahb_clk, "ahb_clk", "h_clk", CMU_BUSCLK1, 2, 2, ahb_factor_table, 0, 0);
> -static OWL_FACTOR(de1_clk, "de_clk1", "de_clk", CMU_DECLK, 0, 3, bisp_factor_table, 0, 0);
> -static OWL_FACTOR(de2_clk, "de_clk2", "de_clk", CMU_DECLK, 4, 3, bisp_factor_table, 0, 0);
> +static OWL_FACTOR(de1_clk, "de_clk1", "de_clk", CMU_DECLK, 0, 4, de_factor_table, 0, 0);
> +static OWL_FACTOR(de2_clk, "de_clk2", "de_clk", CMU_DECLK, 4, 4, de_factor_table, 0, 0);
>  
>  /* composite clocks */
>  static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(vce_clk, "vce_clk", hde_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_VCECLK, 4, 2),
>  			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 26, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_VCECLK, 0, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> +			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_VCECLK, 0, 3, 0, hde_factor_table),
>  			0);
>  
>  static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(vde_clk, "vde_clk", hde_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_VDECLK, 4, 2),
>  			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 25, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_VDECLK, 0, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> +			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_VDECLK, 0, 3, 0, hde_factor_table),
>  			0);
>  
> -static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(bisp_clk, "bisp_clk", bisp_clk_mux_p,
> +static OWL_COMP_DIV(bisp_clk, "bisp_clk", bisp_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_BISPCLK, 4, 1),
>  			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 14, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_BISPCLK, 0, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> +			OWL_DIVIDER_HW(CMU_BISPCLK, 0, 4, 0, std12rate_div_table),
>  			0);
>  
> -static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(sensor0_clk, "sensor0_clk", sensor_clk_mux_p,
> +static OWL_COMP_DIV(sensor0_clk, "sensor0_clk", sensor_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 4, 1),
> -			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 14, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 0, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> -			CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED);
> +			{ 0 },
> +			OWL_DIVIDER_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 0, 4, 0, std12rate_div_table),
> +			0);
>  
> -static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(sensor1_clk, "sensor1_clk", sensor_clk_mux_p,
> +static OWL_COMP_DIV(sensor1_clk, "sensor1_clk", sensor_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 4, 1),
> -			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 14, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 8, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> -			CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED);
> +			{ 0 },
> +			OWL_DIVIDER_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 8, 4, 0, std12rate_div_table),
> +			0);
>  
>  static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(sd0_clk, "sd0_clk", sd_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_SD0CLK, 9, 1),
> -- 
> 2.30.1
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
Cc: "Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
	"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Edgar Bernardi Righi" <edgar.righi@lsitec.org.br>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-actions@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] clk: actions: Fix bisp_factor_table based clocks on Owl S500 SoC
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:47:39 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210316041739.GC1798@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13576ddb604a9097603d95cd2605275c20fb2f56.1615221459.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 07:18:28PM +0200, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> The following clocks of the Actions Semi Owl S500 SoC have been defined
> to use a shared clock factor table 'bisp_factor_table[]': DE[1-2], VCE,
> VDE, BISP, SENSOR[0-1]
> 
> There are several issues involved in this approach:
> 
> * 'bisp_factor_table[]' describes the configuration of a regular 8-rates
>   divider, so its usage is redundant. Additionally, judging by the BISP
>   clock context, it is incomplete since it maps only 8 out of 12
>   possible entries.
> 
> * The clocks mentioned above are not identical in terms of the available
>   rates, therefore cannot rely on the same factor table. Specifically,
>   BISP and SENSOR* are standard 12-rate dividers so their configuration
>   should rely on a proper clock div table, while VCE and VDE require a
>   factor table that is a actually a subset of the one needed for DE[1-2]
>   clocks.
> 
> Let's fix this by implementing the following:
> 
> * Add new factor tables 'de_factor_table' and 'hde_factor_table' to
>   properly handle DE[1-2], VCE and VDE clocks.
> 
> * Add a common div table 'std12rate_div_table' for BISP and SENSOR[0-1]
>   clocks converted to OWL_COMP_DIV.
> 
> * Drop the now unused 'bisp_factor_table[]'.
> 

Nice!

> Additionally, since SENSOR[0-1] are not gated, unset the OWL_GATE_HW
> configuration and drop the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag in their definitions.
> 

No. You should not screen the functionality exposed by the hw, that's what the
purpose of these CLK_ flags.

Other than that, this patch looks good to me.

> Fixes: ed6b4795ece4 ("clk: actions: Add clock driver for S500 SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c
> index 69cd959205f5..abe8874353de 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-s500.c
> @@ -138,9 +138,16 @@ static struct clk_factor_table sd_factor_table[] = {
>  	{ 0, 0, 0 },
>  };
>  
> -static struct clk_factor_table bisp_factor_table[] = {
> -	{ 0, 1, 1 }, { 1, 1, 2 }, { 2, 1, 3 }, { 3, 1, 4 },
> -	{ 4, 1, 5 }, { 5, 1, 6 }, { 6, 1, 7 }, { 7, 1, 8 },
> +static struct clk_factor_table de_factor_table[] = {
> +	{ 0, 1, 1 }, { 1, 2, 3 }, { 2, 1, 2 }, { 3, 2, 5 },
> +	{ 4, 1, 3 }, { 5, 1, 4 }, { 6, 1, 6 }, { 7, 1, 8 },
> +	{ 8, 1, 12 },
> +	{ 0, 0, 0 },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_factor_table hde_factor_table[] = {
> +	{ 0, 1, 1 }, { 1, 2, 3 }, { 2, 1, 2 }, { 3, 2, 5 },
> +	{ 4, 1, 3 }, { 5, 1, 4 }, { 6, 1, 6 }, { 7, 1, 8 },
>  	{ 0, 0, 0 },
>  };
>  
> @@ -154,6 +161,13 @@ static struct clk_div_table rmii_ref_div_table[] = {
>  	{ 0, 0 },
>  };
>  
> +static struct clk_div_table std12rate_div_table[] = {
> +	{ 0, 1 }, { 1, 2 }, { 2, 3 }, { 3, 4 },
> +	{ 4, 5 }, { 5, 6 }, { 6, 7 }, { 7, 8 },
> +	{ 8, 9 }, { 9, 10 }, { 10, 11 }, { 11, 12 },
> +	{ 0, 0 },
> +};
> +
>  static struct clk_div_table i2s_div_table[] = {
>  	{ 0, 1 }, { 1, 2 }, { 2, 3 }, { 3, 4 },
>  	{ 4, 6 }, { 5, 8 }, { 6, 12 }, { 7, 16 },
> @@ -189,39 +203,39 @@ static OWL_DIVIDER(rmii_ref_clk, "rmii_ref_clk", "ethernet_pll_clk", CMU_ETHERNE
>  
>  /* factor clocks */
>  static OWL_FACTOR(ahb_clk, "ahb_clk", "h_clk", CMU_BUSCLK1, 2, 2, ahb_factor_table, 0, 0);
> -static OWL_FACTOR(de1_clk, "de_clk1", "de_clk", CMU_DECLK, 0, 3, bisp_factor_table, 0, 0);
> -static OWL_FACTOR(de2_clk, "de_clk2", "de_clk", CMU_DECLK, 4, 3, bisp_factor_table, 0, 0);
> +static OWL_FACTOR(de1_clk, "de_clk1", "de_clk", CMU_DECLK, 0, 4, de_factor_table, 0, 0);
> +static OWL_FACTOR(de2_clk, "de_clk2", "de_clk", CMU_DECLK, 4, 4, de_factor_table, 0, 0);
>  
>  /* composite clocks */
>  static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(vce_clk, "vce_clk", hde_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_VCECLK, 4, 2),
>  			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 26, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_VCECLK, 0, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> +			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_VCECLK, 0, 3, 0, hde_factor_table),
>  			0);
>  
>  static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(vde_clk, "vde_clk", hde_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_VDECLK, 4, 2),
>  			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 25, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_VDECLK, 0, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> +			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_VDECLK, 0, 3, 0, hde_factor_table),
>  			0);
>  
> -static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(bisp_clk, "bisp_clk", bisp_clk_mux_p,
> +static OWL_COMP_DIV(bisp_clk, "bisp_clk", bisp_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_BISPCLK, 4, 1),
>  			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 14, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_BISPCLK, 0, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> +			OWL_DIVIDER_HW(CMU_BISPCLK, 0, 4, 0, std12rate_div_table),
>  			0);
>  
> -static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(sensor0_clk, "sensor0_clk", sensor_clk_mux_p,
> +static OWL_COMP_DIV(sensor0_clk, "sensor0_clk", sensor_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 4, 1),
> -			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 14, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 0, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> -			CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED);
> +			{ 0 },
> +			OWL_DIVIDER_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 0, 4, 0, std12rate_div_table),
> +			0);
>  
> -static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(sensor1_clk, "sensor1_clk", sensor_clk_mux_p,
> +static OWL_COMP_DIV(sensor1_clk, "sensor1_clk", sensor_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 4, 1),
> -			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 14, 0),
> -			OWL_FACTOR_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 8, 3, 0, bisp_factor_table),
> -			CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED);
> +			{ 0 },
> +			OWL_DIVIDER_HW(CMU_SENSORCLK, 8, 4, 0, std12rate_div_table),
> +			0);
>  
>  static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(sd0_clk, "sd0_clk", sd_clk_mux_p,
>  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_SD0CLK, 9, 1),
> -- 
> 2.30.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-16  4:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-08 17:18 [PATCH 0/6] Improve clock support for Actions S500 SoC Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-08 17:18 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-08 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/6] clk: actions: Fix UART clock dividers on Owl " Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-08 17:18   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-16  3:50   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-16  3:50     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-08 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/6] clk: actions: Fix SD clocks factor table " Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-08 17:18   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-16  3:58   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-16  3:58     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-16 18:14     ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-16 18:14       ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-26 10:07       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-05-26 10:07         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-05-27 13:27         ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-27 13:27           ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-08 17:18 ` [PATCH 3/6] clk: actions: Fix bisp_factor_table based clocks " Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-08 17:18   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-16  4:17   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2021-03-16  4:17     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-16 18:37     ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-16 18:37       ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-26 10:18       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-05-26 10:18         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-05-27 13:34         ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-27 13:34           ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-08 17:18 ` [PATCH 4/6] clk: actions: Fix AHPPREDIV-H-AHB clock chain " Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-08 17:18   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-16  5:45   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-16  5:45     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-16 18:50     ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-16 18:50       ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-26 10:12       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-05-26 10:12         ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-05-27 13:45         ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-27 13:45           ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-08 17:18 ` [PATCH 5/6] dt-bindings: clock: Add NIC and ETHERNET bindings for Actions " Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-08 17:18   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-16 22:00   ` Rob Herring
2021-03-16 22:00     ` Rob Herring
2021-03-08 17:18 ` [PATCH 6/6] clk: actions: Add NIC and ETHERNET clock support " Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-08 17:18   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-16  5:52   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-16  5:52     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-03-16 19:02     ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-03-16 19:02       ` Cristian Ciocaltea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210316041739.GC1798@thinkpad \
    --to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edgar.righi@lsitec.org.br \
    --cc=linux-actions@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.