From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
bskeggs@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
jhubbard@nvidia.com, rcampbell@nvidia.com, jglisse@redhat.com,
hch@infradead.org, daniel@ffwll.ch, willy@infradead.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/8] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:49:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210330184903.GZ2356281@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326000805.2518-4-apopple@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:08:00AM +1100, Alistair Popple wrote:
> +static bool try_to_munlock_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long address, void *arg)
> +{
Is this function name right?
> + struct page_vma_mapped_walk pvmw = {
> + .page = page,
> + .vma = vma,
> + .address = address,
> + };
> +
> + /* munlock has nothing to gain from examining un-locked vmas */
> + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED))
> + return true;
> +
> + while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
> + /* PTE-mapped THP are never mlocked */
> + if (!PageTransCompound(page)) {
> + /*
> + * Holding pte lock, we do *not* need
> + * mmap_lock here
> + */
> + mlock_vma_page(page);
Because the only action this function seems to take is to call
*mlock*_vma_page()
> + }
> + page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
> +
> + /* found a mlocked page, no point continuing munlock check */
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * try_to_munlock - try to munlock a page
> * @page: the page to be munlocked
> @@ -1796,8 +1821,7 @@ bool try_to_unmap(struct page *page, enum ttu_flags flags)
> void try_to_munlock(struct page *page)
> {
But this is also called try_to_munlock ??
/**
* try_to_munlock - try to munlock a page
* @page: the page to be munlocked
*
* Called from munlock code. Checks all of the VMAs mapping the page
* to make sure nobody else has this page mlocked. The page will be
* returned with PG_mlocked cleared if no other vmas have it mlocked.
*/
So what clears PG_mlocked on this call path?
Something needs attention here..
Jason
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
bskeggs@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
jhubbard@nvidia.com, rcampbell@nvidia.com, jglisse@redhat.com,
hch@infradead.org, daniel@ffwll.ch, willy@infradead.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/8] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:49:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210330184903.GZ2356281@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326000805.2518-4-apopple@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:08:00AM +1100, Alistair Popple wrote:
> +static bool try_to_munlock_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long address, void *arg)
> +{
Is this function name right?
> + struct page_vma_mapped_walk pvmw = {
> + .page = page,
> + .vma = vma,
> + .address = address,
> + };
> +
> + /* munlock has nothing to gain from examining un-locked vmas */
> + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED))
> + return true;
> +
> + while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
> + /* PTE-mapped THP are never mlocked */
> + if (!PageTransCompound(page)) {
> + /*
> + * Holding pte lock, we do *not* need
> + * mmap_lock here
> + */
> + mlock_vma_page(page);
Because the only action this function seems to take is to call
*mlock*_vma_page()
> + }
> + page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
> +
> + /* found a mlocked page, no point continuing munlock check */
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * try_to_munlock - try to munlock a page
> * @page: the page to be munlocked
> @@ -1796,8 +1821,7 @@ bool try_to_unmap(struct page *page, enum ttu_flags flags)
> void try_to_munlock(struct page *page)
> {
But this is also called try_to_munlock ??
/**
* try_to_munlock - try to munlock a page
* @page: the page to be munlocked
*
* Called from munlock code. Checks all of the VMAs mapping the page
* to make sure nobody else has this page mlocked. The page will be
* returned with PG_mlocked cleared if no other vmas have it mlocked.
*/
So what clears PG_mlocked on this call path?
Something needs attention here..
Jason
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: rcampbell@nvidia.com, willy@infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
bskeggs@redhat.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v7 3/8] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:49:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210330184903.GZ2356281@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326000805.2518-4-apopple@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:08:00AM +1100, Alistair Popple wrote:
> +static bool try_to_munlock_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long address, void *arg)
> +{
Is this function name right?
> + struct page_vma_mapped_walk pvmw = {
> + .page = page,
> + .vma = vma,
> + .address = address,
> + };
> +
> + /* munlock has nothing to gain from examining un-locked vmas */
> + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED))
> + return true;
> +
> + while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
> + /* PTE-mapped THP are never mlocked */
> + if (!PageTransCompound(page)) {
> + /*
> + * Holding pte lock, we do *not* need
> + * mmap_lock here
> + */
> + mlock_vma_page(page);
Because the only action this function seems to take is to call
*mlock*_vma_page()
> + }
> + page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
> +
> + /* found a mlocked page, no point continuing munlock check */
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * try_to_munlock - try to munlock a page
> * @page: the page to be munlocked
> @@ -1796,8 +1821,7 @@ bool try_to_unmap(struct page *page, enum ttu_flags flags)
> void try_to_munlock(struct page *page)
> {
But this is also called try_to_munlock ??
/**
* try_to_munlock - try to munlock a page
* @page: the page to be munlocked
*
* Called from munlock code. Checks all of the VMAs mapping the page
* to make sure nobody else has this page mlocked. The page will be
* returned with PG_mlocked cleared if no other vmas have it mlocked.
*/
So what clears PG_mlocked on this call path?
Something needs attention here..
Jason
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: rcampbell@nvidia.com, willy@infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
jglisse@redhat.com, bskeggs@redhat.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/8] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:49:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210330184903.GZ2356281@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210326000805.2518-4-apopple@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:08:00AM +1100, Alistair Popple wrote:
> +static bool try_to_munlock_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long address, void *arg)
> +{
Is this function name right?
> + struct page_vma_mapped_walk pvmw = {
> + .page = page,
> + .vma = vma,
> + .address = address,
> + };
> +
> + /* munlock has nothing to gain from examining un-locked vmas */
> + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED))
> + return true;
> +
> + while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
> + /* PTE-mapped THP are never mlocked */
> + if (!PageTransCompound(page)) {
> + /*
> + * Holding pte lock, we do *not* need
> + * mmap_lock here
> + */
> + mlock_vma_page(page);
Because the only action this function seems to take is to call
*mlock*_vma_page()
> + }
> + page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
> +
> + /* found a mlocked page, no point continuing munlock check */
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * try_to_munlock - try to munlock a page
> * @page: the page to be munlocked
> @@ -1796,8 +1821,7 @@ bool try_to_unmap(struct page *page, enum ttu_flags flags)
> void try_to_munlock(struct page *page)
> {
But this is also called try_to_munlock ??
/**
* try_to_munlock - try to munlock a page
* @page: the page to be munlocked
*
* Called from munlock code. Checks all of the VMAs mapping the page
* to make sure nobody else has this page mlocked. The page will be
* returned with PG_mlocked cleared if no other vmas have it mlocked.
*/
So what clears PG_mlocked on this call path?
Something needs attention here..
Jason
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-30 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-26 0:07 [PATCH v7 0/8] Add support for SVM atomics in Nouveau Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:07 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:07 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:07 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:07 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] mm: Remove special swap entry functions Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:07 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:07 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:07 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 18:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30 18:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30 18:38 ` [Nouveau] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30 18:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-26 0:07 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] mm/swapops: Rework swap entry manipulation code Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:07 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:07 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:07 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] mm/rmap: Split try_to_munlock from try_to_unmap Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 18:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-03-30 18:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30 18:49 ` [Nouveau] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30 18:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30 22:09 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 22:09 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 22:09 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 22:09 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 22:16 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 22:16 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 22:16 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 22:16 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 22:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30 22:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30 22:24 ` [Nouveau] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30 22:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30 22:43 ` John Hubbard
2021-03-30 22:43 ` John Hubbard
2021-03-30 22:43 ` [Nouveau] " John Hubbard
2021-03-30 22:43 ` John Hubbard
2021-03-30 22:56 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 22:56 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 22:56 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 22:56 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-31 3:56 ` John Hubbard
2021-03-31 3:56 ` John Hubbard
2021-03-31 3:56 ` [Nouveau] " John Hubbard
2021-03-31 3:56 ` John Hubbard
2021-03-31 4:09 ` John Hubbard
2021-03-31 4:09 ` John Hubbard
2021-03-31 4:09 ` [Nouveau] " John Hubbard
2021-03-31 4:09 ` John Hubbard
2021-03-31 4:15 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-31 4:15 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-31 4:15 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-31 4:15 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-31 11:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-31 11:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-31 11:57 ` [Nouveau] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-31 11:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-01 4:36 ` Alistair Popple
2021-04-01 4:36 ` Alistair Popple
2021-04-01 4:36 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-04-01 4:36 ` Alistair Popple
2021-04-01 19:21 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-01 19:21 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-04-01 19:21 ` [Nouveau] " Shakeel Butt
2021-04-01 19:21 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-03-26 0:08 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] mm/rmap: Split migration into its own function Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] mm: Device exclusive memory access Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-30 19:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30 19:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30 19:32 ` [Nouveau] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-30 19:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-31 12:59 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-31 12:59 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-31 12:59 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-31 12:59 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-31 13:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-31 13:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-31 13:18 ` [Nouveau] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-31 13:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-31 13:27 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-31 13:27 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-31 13:27 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-31 13:27 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-31 13:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-31 13:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-31 13:46 ` [Nouveau] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-31 13:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-01 0:45 ` Alistair Popple
2021-04-01 0:45 ` Alistair Popple
2021-04-01 0:45 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-04-01 0:45 ` Alistair Popple
2021-04-01 0:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-01 0:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-01 0:48 ` [Nouveau] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-01 0:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-01 2:20 ` Alistair Popple
2021-04-01 2:20 ` Alistair Popple
2021-04-01 2:20 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-04-01 2:20 ` Alistair Popple
2021-04-01 11:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-01 11:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-01 11:55 ` [Nouveau] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-01 11:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-03-26 0:08 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] mm: Selftests for exclusive device memory Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] nouveau/svm: Refactor nouveau_range_fault Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] nouveau/svm: Implement atomic SVM access Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` [Nouveau] " Alistair Popple
2021-03-26 0:08 ` Alistair Popple
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210330184903.GZ2356281@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.