From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] kernel/resource: Allow find_next_iomem_res() to exclude overlapping child resources
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 10:57:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210531095720.77469-4-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210531095720.77469-1-maz@kernel.org>
find_next_iomem_res() returns the first resource that matches the
input parameters (range, flags, desc). It however ignores any
sub-resource that may invalidate the usefulness of such resource.
Allow find_next_iomem_res() to filter out such sub-resources and
wire it into the callers. As nobody is interested in this type
of filtering yet, there shouldn't be any functional change.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
kernel/resource.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index ca9f5198a01f..0e4d2ca763cd 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -318,6 +318,42 @@ int release_resource(struct resource *old)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
+static int exclude_overlapping_child_res(struct resource *res,
+ struct resource *child)
+{
+ struct resource cursor = *res;
+
+ for (; child; child = child->sibling) {
+ if (!resource_overlaps(&cursor, child))
+ continue;
+
+ if (cursor.start < child->start) {
+ *res = (struct resource) {
+ .start = cursor.start,
+ .end = child->start - 1,
+ .flags = res->flags,
+ .desc = res->desc,
+ .parent = res->parent,
+ };
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This may result in a resource with a negative size
+ * at the very end of the loop.
+ */
+ cursor.start = child->end + 1;
+ }
+
+ if (cursor.start <= cursor.end) {
+ *res = cursor;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return -ENODEV;
+}
+
/**
* find_next_iomem_res - Finds the lowest iomem resource that covers part of
* [@start..@end].
@@ -330,6 +366,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
* @end: end address of same resource
* @flags: flags which the resource must have
* @desc: descriptor the resource must have
+ * @exclude_child_res: exclude parts of resource that have overlapping children
* @res: return ptr, if resource found
*
* The caller must specify @start, @end, @flags, and @desc
@@ -337,7 +374,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
*/
static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc,
- struct resource *res)
+ bool exclude_child_res, struct resource *res)
{
struct resource *p;
@@ -348,7 +385,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
return -EINVAL;
read_lock(&resource_lock);
-
+again:
for (p = iomem_resource.child; p; p = next_resource(p)) {
/* If we passed the resource we are looking for, stop */
if (p->start > end) {
@@ -378,6 +415,15 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
.desc = p->desc,
.parent = p->parent,
};
+
+ if (exclude_child_res &&
+ exclude_overlapping_child_res(res, p->child)) {
+ start = res->end + 1;
+ if (start >= end)
+ p = NULL;
+ else
+ goto again;
+ }
}
read_unlock(&resource_lock);
@@ -386,6 +432,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc,
+ bool exclude_child_res,
void *arg,
int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
{
@@ -393,7 +440,8 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
int ret = -EINVAL;
while (start < end &&
- !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc, &res)) {
+ !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc,
+ exclude_child_res, &res)) {
ret = (*func)(&res, arg);
if (ret)
break;
@@ -424,7 +472,7 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
int walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start,
u64 end, void *arg, int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
{
- return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, desc, arg, func);
+ return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, desc, false, arg, func);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(walk_iomem_res_desc);
@@ -440,8 +488,8 @@ int walk_system_ram_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
{
unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
- return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, arg,
- func);
+ return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE,
+ false, arg, func);
}
/*
@@ -453,8 +501,8 @@ int walk_mem_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
{
unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
- return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, arg,
- func);
+ return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE,
+ false, arg, func);
}
/*
@@ -475,7 +523,8 @@ int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
end = ((u64)(start_pfn + nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
while (start < end &&
- !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, &res)) {
+ !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE,
+ false, &res)) {
pfn = PFN_UP(res.start);
end_pfn = PFN_DOWN(res.end + 1);
if (end_pfn > pfn)
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] kernel/resource: Allow find_next_iomem_res() to exclude overlapping child resources
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 10:57:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210531095720.77469-4-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210531095720.77469-1-maz@kernel.org>
find_next_iomem_res() returns the first resource that matches the
input parameters (range, flags, desc). It however ignores any
sub-resource that may invalidate the usefulness of such resource.
Allow find_next_iomem_res() to filter out such sub-resources and
wire it into the callers. As nobody is interested in this type
of filtering yet, there shouldn't be any functional change.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
kernel/resource.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index ca9f5198a01f..0e4d2ca763cd 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -318,6 +318,42 @@ int release_resource(struct resource *old)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
+static int exclude_overlapping_child_res(struct resource *res,
+ struct resource *child)
+{
+ struct resource cursor = *res;
+
+ for (; child; child = child->sibling) {
+ if (!resource_overlaps(&cursor, child))
+ continue;
+
+ if (cursor.start < child->start) {
+ *res = (struct resource) {
+ .start = cursor.start,
+ .end = child->start - 1,
+ .flags = res->flags,
+ .desc = res->desc,
+ .parent = res->parent,
+ };
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This may result in a resource with a negative size
+ * at the very end of the loop.
+ */
+ cursor.start = child->end + 1;
+ }
+
+ if (cursor.start <= cursor.end) {
+ *res = cursor;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return -ENODEV;
+}
+
/**
* find_next_iomem_res - Finds the lowest iomem resource that covers part of
* [@start..@end].
@@ -330,6 +366,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
* @end: end address of same resource
* @flags: flags which the resource must have
* @desc: descriptor the resource must have
+ * @exclude_child_res: exclude parts of resource that have overlapping children
* @res: return ptr, if resource found
*
* The caller must specify @start, @end, @flags, and @desc
@@ -337,7 +374,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
*/
static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc,
- struct resource *res)
+ bool exclude_child_res, struct resource *res)
{
struct resource *p;
@@ -348,7 +385,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
return -EINVAL;
read_lock(&resource_lock);
-
+again:
for (p = iomem_resource.child; p; p = next_resource(p)) {
/* If we passed the resource we are looking for, stop */
if (p->start > end) {
@@ -378,6 +415,15 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
.desc = p->desc,
.parent = p->parent,
};
+
+ if (exclude_child_res &&
+ exclude_overlapping_child_res(res, p->child)) {
+ start = res->end + 1;
+ if (start >= end)
+ p = NULL;
+ else
+ goto again;
+ }
}
read_unlock(&resource_lock);
@@ -386,6 +432,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc,
+ bool exclude_child_res,
void *arg,
int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
{
@@ -393,7 +440,8 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
int ret = -EINVAL;
while (start < end &&
- !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc, &res)) {
+ !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc,
+ exclude_child_res, &res)) {
ret = (*func)(&res, arg);
if (ret)
break;
@@ -424,7 +472,7 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
int walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start,
u64 end, void *arg, int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
{
- return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, desc, arg, func);
+ return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, desc, false, arg, func);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(walk_iomem_res_desc);
@@ -440,8 +488,8 @@ int walk_system_ram_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
{
unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
- return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, arg,
- func);
+ return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE,
+ false, arg, func);
}
/*
@@ -453,8 +501,8 @@ int walk_mem_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
{
unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
- return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, arg,
- func);
+ return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE,
+ false, arg, func);
}
/*
@@ -475,7 +523,8 @@ int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
end = ((u64)(start_pfn + nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
while (start < end &&
- !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, &res)) {
+ !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE,
+ false, &res)) {
pfn = PFN_UP(res.start);
end_pfn = PFN_DOWN(res.end + 1);
if (end_pfn > pfn)
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] kernel/resource: Allow find_next_iomem_res() to exclude overlapping child resources
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 10:57:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210531095720.77469-4-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210531095720.77469-1-maz@kernel.org>
find_next_iomem_res() returns the first resource that matches the
input parameters (range, flags, desc). It however ignores any
sub-resource that may invalidate the usefulness of such resource.
Allow find_next_iomem_res() to filter out such sub-resources and
wire it into the callers. As nobody is interested in this type
of filtering yet, there shouldn't be any functional change.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
kernel/resource.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index ca9f5198a01f..0e4d2ca763cd 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -318,6 +318,42 @@ int release_resource(struct resource *old)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
+static int exclude_overlapping_child_res(struct resource *res,
+ struct resource *child)
+{
+ struct resource cursor = *res;
+
+ for (; child; child = child->sibling) {
+ if (!resource_overlaps(&cursor, child))
+ continue;
+
+ if (cursor.start < child->start) {
+ *res = (struct resource) {
+ .start = cursor.start,
+ .end = child->start - 1,
+ .flags = res->flags,
+ .desc = res->desc,
+ .parent = res->parent,
+ };
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This may result in a resource with a negative size
+ * at the very end of the loop.
+ */
+ cursor.start = child->end + 1;
+ }
+
+ if (cursor.start <= cursor.end) {
+ *res = cursor;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return -ENODEV;
+}
+
/**
* find_next_iomem_res - Finds the lowest iomem resource that covers part of
* [@start..@end].
@@ -330,6 +366,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
* @end: end address of same resource
* @flags: flags which the resource must have
* @desc: descriptor the resource must have
+ * @exclude_child_res: exclude parts of resource that have overlapping children
* @res: return ptr, if resource found
*
* The caller must specify @start, @end, @flags, and @desc
@@ -337,7 +374,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
*/
static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc,
- struct resource *res)
+ bool exclude_child_res, struct resource *res)
{
struct resource *p;
@@ -348,7 +385,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
return -EINVAL;
read_lock(&resource_lock);
-
+again:
for (p = iomem_resource.child; p; p = next_resource(p)) {
/* If we passed the resource we are looking for, stop */
if (p->start > end) {
@@ -378,6 +415,15 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
.desc = p->desc,
.parent = p->parent,
};
+
+ if (exclude_child_res &&
+ exclude_overlapping_child_res(res, p->child)) {
+ start = res->end + 1;
+ if (start >= end)
+ p = NULL;
+ else
+ goto again;
+ }
}
read_unlock(&resource_lock);
@@ -386,6 +432,7 @@ static int find_next_iomem_res(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
unsigned long flags, unsigned long desc,
+ bool exclude_child_res,
void *arg,
int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
{
@@ -393,7 +440,8 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
int ret = -EINVAL;
while (start < end &&
- !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc, &res)) {
+ !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, desc,
+ exclude_child_res, &res)) {
ret = (*func)(&res, arg);
if (ret)
break;
@@ -424,7 +472,7 @@ static int __walk_iomem_res_desc(resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
int walk_iomem_res_desc(unsigned long desc, unsigned long flags, u64 start,
u64 end, void *arg, int (*func)(struct resource *, void *))
{
- return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, desc, arg, func);
+ return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, desc, false, arg, func);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(walk_iomem_res_desc);
@@ -440,8 +488,8 @@ int walk_system_ram_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
{
unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
- return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, arg,
- func);
+ return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE,
+ false, arg, func);
}
/*
@@ -453,8 +501,8 @@ int walk_mem_res(u64 start, u64 end, void *arg,
{
unsigned long flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
- return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, arg,
- func);
+ return __walk_iomem_res_desc(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE,
+ false, arg, func);
}
/*
@@ -475,7 +523,8 @@ int walk_system_ram_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
end = ((u64)(start_pfn + nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
while (start < end &&
- !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE, &res)) {
+ !find_next_iomem_res(start, end, flags, IORES_DESC_NONE,
+ false, &res)) {
pfn = PFN_UP(res.start);
end_pfn = PFN_DOWN(res.end + 1);
if (end_pfn > pfn)
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-31 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-31 9:57 [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: Make kexec_file_load honor iomem reservations Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] arm64: kexec_file: Forbid non-crash kernels Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 19:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-31 19:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-31 19:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-06-01 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-01 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-01 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-06-04 16:20 ` James Morse
2021-06-04 16:20 ` James Morse
2021-06-04 16:20 ` James Morse
2021-05-31 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] kexec_file: Make locate_mem_hole_callback global Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-05-31 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] kernel/resource: Allow find_next_iomem_res() to exclude overlapping child resources Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] kernel/resource: Introduce walk_system_ram_excluding_child_res() Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: kexec_image: Restore full kexec functionnality Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-31 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: Make kexec_file_load honor iomem reservations Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-31 19:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-31 19:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-06-04 16:20 ` James Morse
2021-06-04 16:20 ` James Morse
2021-06-04 16:20 ` James Morse
2021-06-09 22:39 ` Moritz Fischer
2021-06-09 22:39 ` Moritz Fischer
2021-06-09 22:39 ` Moritz Fischer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210531095720.77469-4-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.