Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] staging: vchiq: Move vchiq char driver to its own file

[Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin98@gmail.com>]

Hello Dan,

On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 12:56:09PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Ojaswin,
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ojaswin-Mujoo/vchiq-Patch-to-separate-platform-and-cdev-code/20210705-000124
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git 77ad1f0e99bd00af024e650b862cfda3137af660
> config: i386-randconfig-m021-20210705 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> smatch warnings:
> drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c:1235 vchiq_release() warn: argument 3 to %lx specifier is cast from pointer
> 
> vim +1235 drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c
> 
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1227  static int vchiq_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1228  {
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1229  	struct vchiq_instance *instance = file->private_data;
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1230  	struct vchiq_state *state = vchiq_get_state();
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1231  	struct vchiq_service *service;
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1232  	int ret = 0;
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1233  	int i;
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1234  
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04 @1235  	vchiq_log_info(vchiq_arm_log_level, "%s: instance=%lx", __func__,
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1236  		       (unsigned long)instance);
> 
> This should eventually be converted to %p so it doesn't defeat KASLR.
> (Not that we really care on raspberry pi, I think?)
Yes, that does seem right, however, this patchset only moves the code from
vchiq_arm.c to vchiq_dev.c and I've not really touched any of the
existing code itself (Except moving it to a new file which is why it shows up
in the patch). 

Hence, I'm not sure if this fix is in scope of this patchset. (I also
have a similar warning by kernel test robot here [1] which and I'm not
sure if I need to act upon). Maybe we can look at this in a separate
patch?

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/7/4/138
> 
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1237  
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1238  	if (!state) {
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1239  		ret = -EPERM;
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1240  		goto out;
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1241  	}
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1242  
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1243  	/* Ensure videocore is awake to allow termination. */
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1244  	vchiq_use_internal(instance->state, NULL, USE_TYPE_VCHIQ);
> 62b5eb4fdf3f5f Ojaswin Mujoo 2021-07-04  1245  
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> 

Thank you for looking into this,
Ojaswin