Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] staging: vchiq: Combine vchiq platform code into single file

[Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin98@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:22:51AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 04:58:21PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 12:49:35PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > Am 04.07.21 um 17:59 schrieb Ojaswin Mujoo:
> > > > Combine the vchiq platform initialization code into a single file by
> > > > merging vchiq_2835_arm.c into vchiq_arm.c
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin98@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/staging/vc04_services/Makefile        |   1 -
> > > >  .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c      | 564 ------------------
> > > >  .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c           | 549 +++++++++++++++++
> > > >  3 files changed, 549 insertions(+), 565 deletions(-)
> > > >  delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/Makefile b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/Makefile
> > > > index 0a04338fc962..1fd191e2e2a5 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/Makefile
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/Makefile
> > > > @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BCM2835_VCHIQ)	+= vchiq.o
> > > >  vchiq-objs := \
> > > >     interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.o  \
> > > >     interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.o \
> > > > -   interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.o \
> > > >     interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_debugfs.o \
> > > >     interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.o \
> > > >  
> > > ...
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> > > > index 0f2de571eba7..9057d01ffd48 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> > > > @@ -25,15 +25,32 @@
> > > >  #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/delay.h>
> > > >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > > > +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > > >  #include <soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h>
> > > >  
> > > >  #include "vchiq_core.h"
> > > >  #include "vchiq_ioctl.h"
> > > >  #include "vchiq_arm.h"
> > > >  #include "vchiq_debugfs.h"
> > > > +#include "vchiq_connected.h"
> > > > +#include "vchiq_pagelist.h"
> > > >  
> > > >  #define DEVICE_NAME "vchiq"
> > > >  
> > > > +#define TOTAL_SLOTS (VCHIQ_SLOT_ZERO_SLOTS + 2 * 32)
> > > > +
> > > > +#define MAX_FRAGMENTS (VCHIQ_NUM_CURRENT_BULKS * 2)
> > > > +
> > > > +#define VCHIQ_PLATFORM_FRAGMENTS_OFFSET_IDX 0
> > > > +#define VCHIQ_PLATFORM_FRAGMENTS_COUNT_IDX  1
> > > > +
> > > > +#define BELL0	0x00
> > > > +#define BELL2	0x08
> > > > +
> > > > +#define ARM_DS_ACTIVE	BIT(2)
> > > > +
> > > >  /* Override the default prefix, which would be vchiq_arm (from the filename) */
> > > >  #undef MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX
> > > >  #define MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX DEVICE_NAME "."
> > > > @@ -59,10 +76,542 @@ static struct vchiq_drvdata bcm2836_drvdata = {
> > > >  	.cache_line_size = 64,
> > > >  };
> > > >  
> > > > +struct vchiq_2835_state {
> > > > +	int inited;
> > > > +	struct vchiq_arm_state arm_state;
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +struct vchiq_pagelist_info {
> > > > +	struct pagelist *pagelist;
> > > > +	size_t pagelist_buffer_size;
> > > > +	dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> > > > +	enum dma_data_direction dma_dir;
> > > > +	unsigned int num_pages;
> > > > +	unsigned int pages_need_release;
> > > > +	struct page **pages;
> > > > +	struct scatterlist *scatterlist;
> > > > +	unsigned int scatterlist_mapped;
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +static void __iomem *g_regs;
> > > > +/* This value is the size of the L2 cache lines as understood by the
> > > > + * VPU firmware, which determines the required alignment of the
> > > > + * offsets/sizes in pagelists.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Modern VPU firmware looks for a DT "cache-line-size" property in
> > > > + * the VCHIQ node and will overwrite it with the actual L2 cache size,
> > > > + * which the kernel must then respect.  That property was rejected
> > > > + * upstream, so we have to use the VPU firmware's compatibility value
> > > > + * of 32.
> > > > + */
> > > > +static unsigned int g_cache_line_size = 32;
> > > > +static unsigned int g_fragments_size;
> > > > +static char *g_fragments_base;
> > > > +static char *g_free_fragments;
> > > > +static struct semaphore g_free_fragments_sema;
> > > > +static struct device *g_dev;
> > > > +
> > > > +static DEFINE_SEMAPHORE(g_free_fragments_mutex);
> > > > +
> > > > +static irqreturn_t
> > > > +vchiq_doorbell_irq(int irq, void *dev_id);
> > > > +
> > > > +static struct vchiq_pagelist_info *
> > > > +create_pagelist(char *buf, char __user *ubuf, size_t count, unsigned short type);
> > > > +
> > > > +static void
> > > > +free_pagelist(struct vchiq_pagelist_info *pagelistinfo,
> > > > +	      int actual);
> > > 
> > > please no forward declarations of these 3 functions. Put them into the
> > > right order instead ...
> > > 
> > > Since this patch is independent from the other ones from the series,
> > > maybe Greg can merg the rest of the series.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > Hello Stefan,
> > 
> > Thanks for the review. As for the forward declerations, sure I can fix
> > these 3 functions and send an independent patch for this.
> 
> Please fix up and resend the whole series properly so that I can apply
> them that way.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
Hello,

I have just sent a revised patchset with requested changes. [1]

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1465322/

Thank you,
Ojaswin