From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: "Sean Wang" <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
"Landen Chao" <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Vivien Didelot" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric Woudstra" <ericwouds@gmail.com>,
"René van Dorst" <opensource@vdorst.com>,
"Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@public-files.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 16:23:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210803082316.2910759-1-dqfext@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210802210006.fhmb5s6dsnziyk7d@skbuf>
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:00:06AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> So then change the port STP state only for FID 1 and resend. Any other
> reason why this patch series is marked RFC? It looked okay to me otherwise.
Okay, will resend with that change and without RFC.
By the way, if I were to implement .port_fast_age, should I only flush
dynamically learned FDB entries? What about MDB entries?
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: "Sean Wang" <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
"Landen Chao" <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Vivien Didelot" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric Woudstra" <ericwouds@gmail.com>,
"René van Dorst" <opensource@vdorst.com>,
"Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@public-files.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 16:23:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210803082316.2910759-1-dqfext@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210802210006.fhmb5s6dsnziyk7d@skbuf>
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:00:06AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> So then change the port STP state only for FID 1 and resend. Any other
> reason why this patch series is marked RFC? It looked okay to me otherwise.
Okay, will resend with that change and without RFC.
By the way, if I were to implement .port_fast_age, should I only flush
dynamically learned FDB entries? What about MDB entries?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: "Sean Wang" <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
"Landen Chao" <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Vivien Didelot" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric Woudstra" <ericwouds@gmail.com>,
"René van Dorst" <opensource@vdorst.com>,
"Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@public-files.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 16:23:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210803082316.2910759-1-dqfext@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210802210006.fhmb5s6dsnziyk7d@skbuf>
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:00:06AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> So then change the port STP state only for FID 1 and resend. Any other
> reason why this patch series is marked RFC? It looked okay to me otherwise.
Okay, will resend with that change and without RFC.
By the way, if I were to implement .port_fast_age, should I only flush
dynamically learned FDB entries? What about MDB entries?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-03 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-31 19:10 [RFC net-next v2 0/4] mt7530 software fallback bridging fix DENG Qingfang
2021-07-31 19:10 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-31 19:10 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-31 19:10 ` [RFC net-next v2 1/4] net: dsa: mt7530: enable assisted learning on CPU port DENG Qingfang
2021-07-31 19:10 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-31 19:10 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-02 13:07 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 13:07 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 13:07 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-31 19:10 ` [RFC net-next v2 2/4] net: dsa: mt7530: use independent VLAN learning on VLAN-unaware bridges DENG Qingfang
2021-07-31 19:10 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-31 19:10 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-02 13:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 13:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 13:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-31 19:10 ` [RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1 DENG Qingfang
2021-07-31 19:10 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-31 19:10 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-02 13:43 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 13:43 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 13:43 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 15:31 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-02 15:31 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-02 15:31 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-02 15:42 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 15:42 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 15:42 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 15:58 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-02 15:58 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-02 15:58 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-02 21:00 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 21:00 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 21:00 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-03 8:23 ` DENG Qingfang [this message]
2021-08-03 8:23 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-03 8:23 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-03 8:48 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-03 8:48 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-03 8:48 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-31 19:10 ` [RFC net-next v2 4/4] Revert "mt7530 mt7530_fdb_write only set ivl bit vid larger than 1" DENG Qingfang
2021-07-31 19:10 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-07-31 19:10 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-02 13:44 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 13:44 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 13:44 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 15:48 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-02 15:48 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-02 15:48 ` DENG Qingfang
2021-08-02 20:59 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 20:59 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-02 20:59 ` Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210803082316.2910759-1-dqfext@gmail.com \
--to=dqfext@gmail.com \
--cc=Landen.Chao@mediatek.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ericwouds@gmail.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=opensource@vdorst.com \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.