All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] driver core: Set DMA ownership during driver bind/unbind
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:24:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211115132442.GA2379906@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZJeRomcJjDqDv9q@infradead.org>

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 05:19:02AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:05:43AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > @@ -566,6 +567,12 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> >  		goto done;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (!drv->suppress_auto_claim_dma_owner) {
> > +		ret = iommu_device_set_dma_owner(dev, DMA_OWNER_KERNEL, NULL);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +	}
> 
> I'd expect this to go into iommu_setup_dma_ops (and its arm and s390
> equivalents), as that is what claims an IOMMU for in-kernel usage

If iommu_device_set_dma_owner(dev_a) fails changes dynamically
depending on what iommu_device_set_dma_owner(dev_b, DMA_OWNER_USER)
have been done.

The whole point here is that doing a
 iommu_device_set_dma_owner(dev_b, DMA_OWNER_USER)
needs to revoke kernel usage from a whole bunch of other devices in
the same group.

revoking kernel usage means it needs to ensure that no driver is bound
and prevent future drivers from being bound.

iommu_setup_dma_ops() is something done once early on in boot, not at
every driver probe, so I don't see how it can help??

Jason
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] driver core: Set DMA ownership during driver bind/unbind
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:24:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211115132442.GA2379906@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZJeRomcJjDqDv9q@infradead.org>

On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 05:19:02AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 10:05:43AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > @@ -566,6 +567,12 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> >  		goto done;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (!drv->suppress_auto_claim_dma_owner) {
> > +		ret = iommu_device_set_dma_owner(dev, DMA_OWNER_KERNEL, NULL);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			return ret;
> > +	}
> 
> I'd expect this to go into iommu_setup_dma_ops (and its arm and s390
> equivalents), as that is what claims an IOMMU for in-kernel usage

If iommu_device_set_dma_owner(dev_a) fails changes dynamically
depending on what iommu_device_set_dma_owner(dev_b, DMA_OWNER_USER)
have been done.

The whole point here is that doing a
 iommu_device_set_dma_owner(dev_b, DMA_OWNER_USER)
needs to revoke kernel usage from a whole bunch of other devices in
the same group.

revoking kernel usage means it needs to ensure that no driver is bound
and prevent future drivers from being bound.

iommu_setup_dma_ops() is something done once early on in boot, not at
every driver probe, so I don't see how it can help??

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-15 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-15  2:05 [PATCH 00/11] Fix BUG_ON in vfio_iommu_group_notifier() Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 01/11] iommu: Add device dma ownership set/release interfaces Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:14     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-16  1:57     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16  1:57       ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16 13:46       ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-16 13:46         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-17  5:22         ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-17  5:22           ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-17 13:35           ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-17 13:35             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-18  1:12             ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-18  1:12               ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-18 14:10               ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-18 14:10                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-18  2:39         ` Tian, Kevin
2021-11-18  2:39           ` Tian, Kevin
2021-11-18 13:33           ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-18 13:33             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-19  5:44             ` Tian, Kevin
2021-11-19  5:44               ` Tian, Kevin
2021-11-19 11:14               ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-19 11:14                 ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-19 15:06                 ` Jörg Rödel
2021-11-19 15:06                   ` Jörg Rödel
2021-11-19 15:43                   ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-19 15:43                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-20 11:16                   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-20 11:16                     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-19 12:56               ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-19 12:56                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 20:38   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-15 20:38     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16  1:52     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16  1:52       ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 02/11] driver core: Set DMA ownership during driver bind/unbind Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  6:59   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-15  6:59     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-15 13:20     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:20       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:38     ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-15 13:38       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 13:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:19     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:24     ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu [this message]
2021-11-15 13:24       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 15:37       ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 15:37         ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 15:56         ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-15 15:56           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 18:15           ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 18:15             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 18:35           ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 18:35             ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 19:39             ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-15 19:39               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 03/11] PCI: pci_stub: Suppress kernel DMA ownership auto-claiming Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:31     ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-15 13:31       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 15:14       ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 15:14         ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 16:17         ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-15 16:17           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 17:54           ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 17:54             ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 18:19             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 18:19               ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 18:44               ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 18:44                 ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 19:22             ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-15 19:22               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 20:58               ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 20:58                 ` Robin Murphy
2021-11-15 21:19                 ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-15 21:19                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15 20:48   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-15 20:48     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-15 22:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-15 22:17     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16  6:05     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16  6:05       ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 04/11] PCI: portdrv: " Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 20:44   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-15 20:44     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16  7:24     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16  7:24       ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16 20:22       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16 20:22         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-16 20:48         ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2021-11-16 20:48           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 05/11] iommu: Add security context management for assigned devices Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-16  7:25     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16  7:25       ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 06/11] iommu: Expose group variants of dma ownership interfaces Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15 13:27   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-15 13:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-16  9:42     ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-16  9:42       ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 07/11] vfio: Use DMA_OWNER_USER to declaim passthrough devices Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 08/11] vfio: Remove use of vfio_group_viable() Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 09/11] vfio: Delete the unbound_list Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 10/11] vfio: Remove iommu group notifier Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05   ` Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05 ` [PATCH 11/11] iommu: Remove iommu group changes notifier Lu Baolu
2021-11-15  2:05   ` Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211115132442.GA2379906@nvidia.com \
    --to=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.