All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Hellstrom Thomas <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>,
	Andi <andi.shyti@intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	Chris_intel_ID <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/gtt/xehpsdv: move scratch page to system memory
Date: Tue,  7 Dec 2021 22:21:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211207165156.31244-4-ramalingam.c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211207165156.31244-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com>

From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>

On some platforms the hw has dropped support for 4K GTT pages when
dealing with LMEM, and due to the design of 64K GTT pages in the hw, we
can only mark the *entire* page-table as operating in 64K GTT mode,
since the enable bit is still on the pde, and not the pte. And since we
we still need to allow 4K GTT pages for SMEM objects, we can't have a
"normal" 4K page-table with scratch pointing to LMEM, since that's
undefined from the hw pov. The simplest solution is to just move the 64K
scratch page to SMEM on such platforms and call it a day, since that
should work for all configurations.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c      |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c      | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c      |  3 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c       |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h       |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c |  2 ++
 6 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c
index 4a166d25fe60..c0d149f04949 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c
@@ -454,6 +454,7 @@ struct i915_ppgtt *gen6_ppgtt_create(struct intel_gt *gt)
 	ppgtt->base.vm.cleanup = gen6_ppgtt_cleanup;
 
 	ppgtt->base.vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ppgtt->base.vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 	ppgtt->base.vm.pte_encode = ggtt->vm.pte_encode;
 
 	err = gen6_ppgtt_init_scratch(ppgtt);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
index 95c02096a61b..b012c50f7ce7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
@@ -776,10 +776,29 @@ struct i915_ppgtt *gen8_ppgtt_create(struct intel_gt *gt,
 	 */
 	ppgtt->vm.has_read_only = !IS_GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915, 11, 12);
 
-	if (HAS_LMEM(gt->i915))
+	if (HAS_LMEM(gt->i915)) {
 		ppgtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_lmem;
-	else
+
+		/*
+		 * On some platforms the hw has dropped support for 4K GTT pages
+		 * when dealing with LMEM, and due to the design of 64K GTT
+		 * pages in the hw, we can only mark the *entire* page-table as
+		 * operating in 64K GTT mode, since the enable bit is still on
+		 * the pde, and not the pte. And since we still need to allow
+		 * 4K GTT pages for SMEM objects, we can't have a "normal" 4K
+		 * page-table with scratch pointing to LMEM, since that's
+		 * undefined from the hw pov. The simplest solution is to just
+		 * move the 64K scratch page to SMEM on such platforms and call
+		 * it a day, since that should work for all configurations.
+		 */
+		if (HAS_64K_PAGES(gt->i915))
+			ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+		else
+			ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_lmem;
+	} else {
 		ppgtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+		ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	}
 
 	err = gen8_init_scratch(&ppgtt->vm);
 	if (err)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
index cbc6d2b1fd9e..d85a1050f4a8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
@@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ static int gen8_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 		size = gen8_get_total_gtt_size(snb_gmch_ctl);
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 	ggtt->vm.lmem_pt_obj_flags = I915_BO_ALLOC_PM_EARLY;
 
 	ggtt->vm.total = (size / sizeof(gen8_pte_t)) * I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -1094,6 +1095,7 @@ static int gen6_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 	ggtt->vm.total = (size / sizeof(gen6_pte_t)) * I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	ggtt->vm.clear_range = nop_clear_range;
 	if (!HAS_FULL_PPGTT(i915) || intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(i915))
@@ -1146,6 +1148,7 @@ static int i915_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 		(struct resource)DEFINE_RES_MEM(gmadr_base, ggtt->mappable_end);
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	if (needs_idle_maps(i915)) {
 		drm_notice(&i915->drm,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
index 0dd254cb1f69..1428e2b9075a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ int setup_scratch_page(struct i915_address_space *vm)
 	do {
 		struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
 
-		obj = vm->alloc_pt_dma(vm, size);
+		obj = vm->alloc_scratch_dma(vm, size);
 		if (IS_ERR(obj))
 			goto skip;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h
index 51afe66d00f2..15b98321e89a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h
@@ -268,6 +268,8 @@ struct i915_address_space {
 
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *
 		(*alloc_pt_dma)(struct i915_address_space *vm, int sz);
+	struct drm_i915_gem_object *
+		(*alloc_scratch_dma)(struct i915_address_space *vm, int sz);
 
 	u64 (*pte_encode)(dma_addr_t addr,
 			  enum i915_cache_level level,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c
index cc047ec594f9..32ca8962d0ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct i915_ppgtt *mock_ppgtt(struct drm_i915_private *i915, const char *name)
 	i915_address_space_init(&ppgtt->vm, VM_CLASS_PPGTT);
 
 	ppgtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	ppgtt->vm.clear_range = mock_clear_range;
 	ppgtt->vm.insert_page = mock_insert_page;
@@ -118,6 +119,7 @@ void mock_init_ggtt(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 	ggtt->vm.total = 4096 * PAGE_SIZE;
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	ggtt->vm.clear_range = mock_clear_range;
 	ggtt->vm.insert_page = mock_insert_page;
-- 
2.20.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Hellstrom Thomas <thomas.hellstrom@intel.com>,
	Andi <andi.shyti@intel.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	Chris_intel_ID <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/gtt/xehpsdv: move scratch page to system memory
Date: Tue,  7 Dec 2021 22:21:55 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211207165156.31244-4-ramalingam.c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211207165156.31244-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com>

From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>

On some platforms the hw has dropped support for 4K GTT pages when
dealing with LMEM, and due to the design of 64K GTT pages in the hw, we
can only mark the *entire* page-table as operating in 64K GTT mode,
since the enable bit is still on the pde, and not the pte. And since we
we still need to allow 4K GTT pages for SMEM objects, we can't have a
"normal" 4K page-table with scratch pointing to LMEM, since that's
undefined from the hw pov. The simplest solution is to just move the 64K
scratch page to SMEM on such platforms and call it a day, since that
should work for all configurations.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c      |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c      | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c      |  3 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c       |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h       |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c |  2 ++
 6 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c
index 4a166d25fe60..c0d149f04949 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen6_ppgtt.c
@@ -454,6 +454,7 @@ struct i915_ppgtt *gen6_ppgtt_create(struct intel_gt *gt)
 	ppgtt->base.vm.cleanup = gen6_ppgtt_cleanup;
 
 	ppgtt->base.vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ppgtt->base.vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 	ppgtt->base.vm.pte_encode = ggtt->vm.pte_encode;
 
 	err = gen6_ppgtt_init_scratch(ppgtt);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
index 95c02096a61b..b012c50f7ce7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c
@@ -776,10 +776,29 @@ struct i915_ppgtt *gen8_ppgtt_create(struct intel_gt *gt,
 	 */
 	ppgtt->vm.has_read_only = !IS_GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915, 11, 12);
 
-	if (HAS_LMEM(gt->i915))
+	if (HAS_LMEM(gt->i915)) {
 		ppgtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_lmem;
-	else
+
+		/*
+		 * On some platforms the hw has dropped support for 4K GTT pages
+		 * when dealing with LMEM, and due to the design of 64K GTT
+		 * pages in the hw, we can only mark the *entire* page-table as
+		 * operating in 64K GTT mode, since the enable bit is still on
+		 * the pde, and not the pte. And since we still need to allow
+		 * 4K GTT pages for SMEM objects, we can't have a "normal" 4K
+		 * page-table with scratch pointing to LMEM, since that's
+		 * undefined from the hw pov. The simplest solution is to just
+		 * move the 64K scratch page to SMEM on such platforms and call
+		 * it a day, since that should work for all configurations.
+		 */
+		if (HAS_64K_PAGES(gt->i915))
+			ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+		else
+			ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_lmem;
+	} else {
 		ppgtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+		ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	}
 
 	err = gen8_init_scratch(&ppgtt->vm);
 	if (err)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
index cbc6d2b1fd9e..d85a1050f4a8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
@@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ static int gen8_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 		size = gen8_get_total_gtt_size(snb_gmch_ctl);
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 	ggtt->vm.lmem_pt_obj_flags = I915_BO_ALLOC_PM_EARLY;
 
 	ggtt->vm.total = (size / sizeof(gen8_pte_t)) * I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
@@ -1094,6 +1095,7 @@ static int gen6_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 	ggtt->vm.total = (size / sizeof(gen6_pte_t)) * I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	ggtt->vm.clear_range = nop_clear_range;
 	if (!HAS_FULL_PPGTT(i915) || intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(i915))
@@ -1146,6 +1148,7 @@ static int i915_gmch_probe(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 		(struct resource)DEFINE_RES_MEM(gmadr_base, ggtt->mappable_end);
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	if (needs_idle_maps(i915)) {
 		drm_notice(&i915->drm,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
index 0dd254cb1f69..1428e2b9075a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.c
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ int setup_scratch_page(struct i915_address_space *vm)
 	do {
 		struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
 
-		obj = vm->alloc_pt_dma(vm, size);
+		obj = vm->alloc_scratch_dma(vm, size);
 		if (IS_ERR(obj))
 			goto skip;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h
index 51afe66d00f2..15b98321e89a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gtt.h
@@ -268,6 +268,8 @@ struct i915_address_space {
 
 	struct drm_i915_gem_object *
 		(*alloc_pt_dma)(struct i915_address_space *vm, int sz);
+	struct drm_i915_gem_object *
+		(*alloc_scratch_dma)(struct i915_address_space *vm, int sz);
 
 	u64 (*pte_encode)(dma_addr_t addr,
 			  enum i915_cache_level level,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c
index cc047ec594f9..32ca8962d0ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_gtt.c
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct i915_ppgtt *mock_ppgtt(struct drm_i915_private *i915, const char *name)
 	i915_address_space_init(&ppgtt->vm, VM_CLASS_PPGTT);
 
 	ppgtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ppgtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	ppgtt->vm.clear_range = mock_clear_range;
 	ppgtt->vm.insert_page = mock_insert_page;
@@ -118,6 +119,7 @@ void mock_init_ggtt(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct i915_ggtt *ggtt)
 	ggtt->vm.total = 4096 * PAGE_SIZE;
 
 	ggtt->vm.alloc_pt_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
+	ggtt->vm.alloc_scratch_dma = alloc_pt_dma;
 
 	ggtt->vm.clear_range = mock_clear_range;
 	ggtt->vm.insert_page = mock_insert_page;
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-07 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-07 16:51 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] Basic enabling of 64k page support Ramalingam C
2021-12-07 16:51 ` Ramalingam C
2021-12-07 16:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Add has_64k_pages flag Ramalingam C
2021-12-07 16:51   ` Ramalingam C
2021-12-08 12:43   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-12-08 12:59     ` Matthew Auld
2021-12-08 13:22       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-12-07 16:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915/xehpsdv: set min page-size to 64K Ramalingam C
2021-12-07 16:51   ` Ramalingam C
2021-12-08 12:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2021-12-07 16:51 ` Ramalingam C [this message]
2021-12-07 16:51   ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/gtt/xehpsdv: move scratch page to system memory Ramalingam C
2021-12-08 13:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2021-12-07 16:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: enforce min page size for scratch Ramalingam C
2021-12-07 16:51   ` Ramalingam C
2021-12-08 13:32   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2021-12-07 20:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Basic enabling of 64k page support Patchwork
2021-12-07 20:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-12-08  3:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-12-08 14:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: " Ramalingam C
2021-12-08 14:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/gtt/xehpsdv: move scratch page to system memory Ramalingam C
2021-12-08 16:11   ` Andi Shyti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211207165156.31244-4-ramalingam.c@intel.com \
    --to=ramalingam.c@intel.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@intel.com \
    --cc=chris.p.wilson@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.