From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: "Andy Gross" <agross@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@ti.com>,
"Stanimir Varbanov" <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] PCI: qcom: Add SM8450 PCIe support
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:00:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211210113031.GF1734@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211208171442.1327689-7-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 08:14:38PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On SM8450 platform PCIe hosts do not use all the clocks (and add several
> additional clocks), so expand the driver to handle these requirements.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 803d3ac18c56..ada9c816395d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 {
>
> /* 6 clocks typically, 7 for sm8250 */
> struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_7_0 {
> - struct clk_bulk_data clks[7];
> + struct clk_bulk_data clks[9];
> int num_clks;
> struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
> struct reset_control *pci_reset;
> @@ -196,7 +196,10 @@ struct qcom_pcie_cfg {
> const struct qcom_pcie_ops *ops;
> /* flags for ops 2.7.0 and 1.9.0 */
> unsigned int pipe_clk_need_muxing:1;
> + unsigned int has_tbu_clk:1;
> unsigned int has_ddrss_sf_tbu_clk:1;
> + unsigned int has_aggre0_clk:1;
> + unsigned int has_aggre1_clk:1;
> };
>
> struct qcom_pcie {
> @@ -1147,6 +1150,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_7_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_7_0 *res = &pcie->res.v2_7_0;
> struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> + unsigned int idx;
u32?
> int ret;
>
> res->pci_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pci");
> @@ -1160,18 +1164,22 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_7_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - res->clks[0].id = "aux";
> - res->clks[1].id = "cfg";
> - res->clks[2].id = "bus_master";
> - res->clks[3].id = "bus_slave";
> - res->clks[4].id = "slave_q2a";
> - res->clks[5].id = "tbu";
> - if (pcie->cfg->has_ddrss_sf_tbu_clk) {
> - res->clks[6].id = "ddrss_sf_tbu";
> - res->num_clks = 7;
> - } else {
> - res->num_clks = 6;
> - }
> + idx = 0;
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "aux";
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "cfg";
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "bus_master";
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "bus_slave";
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "slave_q2a";
> + if (pcie->cfg->has_tbu_clk)
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "tbu";
> + if (pcie->cfg->has_ddrss_sf_tbu_clk)
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "ddrss_sf_tbu";
> + if (pcie->cfg->has_aggre0_clk)
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "aggre0";
> + if (pcie->cfg->has_aggre1_clk)
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "aggre1";
> +
> + res->num_clks = idx;
res->num_clks = idx + 1?
Thanks,
Mani
>
> ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, res->num_clks, res->clks);
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -1510,15 +1518,27 @@ static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg ipq4019_cfg = {
>
> static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg sdm845_cfg = {
> .ops = &ops_2_7_0,
> + .has_tbu_clk = true,
> };
>
> static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg sm8250_cfg = {
> .ops = &ops_1_9_0,
> + .has_tbu_clk = true,
> .has_ddrss_sf_tbu_clk = true,
> };
>
> +/* Only for the PCIe0! */
> +static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg sm8450_cfg = {
> + .ops = &ops_1_9_0,
> + .has_ddrss_sf_tbu_clk = true,
> + .pipe_clk_need_muxing = true,
> + .has_aggre0_clk = true,
> + .has_aggre1_clk = true,
> +};
> +
> static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg sc7280_cfg = {
> .ops = &ops_1_9_0,
> + .has_tbu_clk = true,
> .pipe_clk_need_muxing = true,
> };
>
> @@ -1626,6 +1646,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sdm845", .data = &sdm845_cfg },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sm8250", .data = &sm8250_cfg },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sc8180x", .data = &sm8250_cfg },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sm8450", .data = &sm8450_cfg },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sc7280", .data = &sc7280_cfg },
> { }
> };
> --
> 2.33.0
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: "Andy Gross" <agross@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Andersson" <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@ti.com>,
"Stanimir Varbanov" <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] PCI: qcom: Add SM8450 PCIe support
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 17:00:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211210113031.GF1734@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211208171442.1327689-7-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 08:14:38PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On SM8450 platform PCIe hosts do not use all the clocks (and add several
> additional clocks), so expand the driver to handle these requirements.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 803d3ac18c56..ada9c816395d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 {
>
> /* 6 clocks typically, 7 for sm8250 */
> struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_7_0 {
> - struct clk_bulk_data clks[7];
> + struct clk_bulk_data clks[9];
> int num_clks;
> struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
> struct reset_control *pci_reset;
> @@ -196,7 +196,10 @@ struct qcom_pcie_cfg {
> const struct qcom_pcie_ops *ops;
> /* flags for ops 2.7.0 and 1.9.0 */
> unsigned int pipe_clk_need_muxing:1;
> + unsigned int has_tbu_clk:1;
> unsigned int has_ddrss_sf_tbu_clk:1;
> + unsigned int has_aggre0_clk:1;
> + unsigned int has_aggre1_clk:1;
> };
>
> struct qcom_pcie {
> @@ -1147,6 +1150,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_7_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_7_0 *res = &pcie->res.v2_7_0;
> struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> + unsigned int idx;
u32?
> int ret;
>
> res->pci_reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pci");
> @@ -1160,18 +1164,22 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_7_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - res->clks[0].id = "aux";
> - res->clks[1].id = "cfg";
> - res->clks[2].id = "bus_master";
> - res->clks[3].id = "bus_slave";
> - res->clks[4].id = "slave_q2a";
> - res->clks[5].id = "tbu";
> - if (pcie->cfg->has_ddrss_sf_tbu_clk) {
> - res->clks[6].id = "ddrss_sf_tbu";
> - res->num_clks = 7;
> - } else {
> - res->num_clks = 6;
> - }
> + idx = 0;
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "aux";
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "cfg";
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "bus_master";
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "bus_slave";
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "slave_q2a";
> + if (pcie->cfg->has_tbu_clk)
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "tbu";
> + if (pcie->cfg->has_ddrss_sf_tbu_clk)
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "ddrss_sf_tbu";
> + if (pcie->cfg->has_aggre0_clk)
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "aggre0";
> + if (pcie->cfg->has_aggre1_clk)
> + res->clks[idx++].id = "aggre1";
> +
> + res->num_clks = idx;
res->num_clks = idx + 1?
Thanks,
Mani
>
> ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, res->num_clks, res->clks);
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -1510,15 +1518,27 @@ static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg ipq4019_cfg = {
>
> static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg sdm845_cfg = {
> .ops = &ops_2_7_0,
> + .has_tbu_clk = true,
> };
>
> static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg sm8250_cfg = {
> .ops = &ops_1_9_0,
> + .has_tbu_clk = true,
> .has_ddrss_sf_tbu_clk = true,
> };
>
> +/* Only for the PCIe0! */
> +static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg sm8450_cfg = {
> + .ops = &ops_1_9_0,
> + .has_ddrss_sf_tbu_clk = true,
> + .pipe_clk_need_muxing = true,
> + .has_aggre0_clk = true,
> + .has_aggre1_clk = true,
> +};
> +
> static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg sc7280_cfg = {
> .ops = &ops_1_9_0,
> + .has_tbu_clk = true,
> .pipe_clk_need_muxing = true,
> };
>
> @@ -1626,6 +1646,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sdm845", .data = &sdm845_cfg },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sm8250", .data = &sm8250_cfg },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sc8180x", .data = &sm8250_cfg },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sm8450", .data = &sm8450_cfg },
> { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sc7280", .data = &sc7280_cfg },
> { }
> };
> --
> 2.33.0
>
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-10 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-08 17:14 [PATCH v2 00/10] qcom: add support for PCIe0 on SM8450 platform Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] dt-bindings: pci: qcom: Document PCIe bindings for SM8450 Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-10 8:42 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-10 8:42 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-08 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp: Add SM8450 PCIe PHY bindings Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] dt-bindings: phy: qcom, qmp: " Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] phy: qcom-qmp: Add SM8450 PCIe0 PHY support Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] PCI: qcom: Remove redundancy between qcom_pcie and qcom_pcie_cfg Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-10 11:15 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-10 11:15 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-11 1:56 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-11 1:56 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] PCI: qcom: Add ddrss_sf_tbu flag Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-10 11:22 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-10 11:22 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-11 1:59 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-11 1:59 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-11 3:11 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-11 3:11 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-08 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] PCI: qcom: Add SM8450 PCIe support Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-10 11:30 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2021-12-10 11:30 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-11 2:01 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-11 2:01 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-11 3:07 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-11 3:07 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-08 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add PCIe0 PHY node Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-10 11:37 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-10 11:37 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-11 2:10 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-11 2:10 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: add PCIe0 RC device Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-08 17:14 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-10 12:06 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-10 12:06 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-12-11 2:24 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-11 2:24 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2021-12-12 21:34 ` Rob Herring
2021-12-12 21:34 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211210113031.GF1734@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=svarbanov@mm-sol.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.