From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v13 05/11] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:56:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117145608.6781-6-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220117145608.6781-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Copy the task argument passed to arch_stack_walk() to unwind_state so that
it can be passed to unwind functions via unwind_state rather than as a
separate argument. The task is a fundamental part of the unwind state.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 3 +++
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 41ec360515f6..af423f5d7ad8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ struct stack_info {
* @kr_cur: When KRETPROBES is selected, holds the kretprobe instance
* associated with the most recently encountered replacement lr
* value.
+ *
+ * @task: Pointer to the task structure.
*/
struct unwind_state {
unsigned long fp;
@@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ struct unwind_state {
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
struct llist_node *kr_cur;
#endif
+ struct task_struct *task;
};
extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index b2b568e5deba..1b32e55735aa 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -33,8 +33,10 @@
*/
-static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state)
+static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
+ struct task_struct *task)
{
+ state->task = task;
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
state->kr_cur = NULL;
#endif
@@ -57,9 +59,10 @@ static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state)
* TODO: document requirements here.
*/
static inline void unwind_init_from_regs(struct unwind_state *state,
+ struct task_struct *task,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- unwind_init_common(state);
+ unwind_init_common(state, task);
state->fp = regs->regs[29];
state->pc = regs->pc;
@@ -71,9 +74,10 @@ static inline void unwind_init_from_regs(struct unwind_state *state,
* Note: this is always inlined, and we expect our caller to be a noinline
* function, such that this starts from our caller's caller.
*/
-static __always_inline void unwind_init_from_current(struct unwind_state *state)
+static __always_inline void unwind_init_from_current(struct unwind_state *state,
+ struct task_struct *task)
{
- unwind_init_common(state);
+ unwind_init_common(state, task);
state->fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(1);
state->pc = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0);
@@ -87,7 +91,7 @@ static __always_inline void unwind_init_from_current(struct unwind_state *state)
static inline void unwind_init_from_task(struct unwind_state *state,
struct task_struct *task)
{
- unwind_init_common(state);
+ unwind_init_common(state, task);
state->fp = thread_saved_fp(task);
state->pc = thread_saved_pc(task);
@@ -100,11 +104,11 @@ static inline void unwind_init_from_task(struct unwind_state *state,
* records (e.g. a cycle), determined based on the location and fp value of A
* and the location (but not the fp value) of B.
*/
-static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
- struct unwind_state *state)
+static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
{
unsigned long fp = state->fp;
struct stack_info info;
+ struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
/* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
@@ -176,8 +180,7 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
-static void notrace unwind(struct task_struct *tsk,
- struct unwind_state *state,
+static void notrace unwind(struct unwind_state *state,
bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data)
{
while (1) {
@@ -185,7 +188,7 @@ static void notrace unwind(struct task_struct *tsk,
if (!fn(data, state->pc))
break;
- ret = unwind_next(tsk, state);
+ ret = unwind_next(state);
if (ret < 0)
break;
}
@@ -232,11 +235,11 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
struct unwind_state state;
if (regs)
- unwind_init_from_regs(&state, regs);
+ unwind_init_from_regs(&state, task, regs);
else if (task == current)
- unwind_init_from_current(&state);
+ unwind_init_from_current(&state, task);
else
unwind_init_from_task(&state, task);
- unwind(task, &state, consume_entry, cookie);
+ unwind(&state, consume_entry, cookie);
}
--
2.25.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v13 05/11] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:56:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117145608.6781-6-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220117145608.6781-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Copy the task argument passed to arch_stack_walk() to unwind_state so that
it can be passed to unwind functions via unwind_state rather than as a
separate argument. The task is a fundamental part of the unwind state.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 3 +++
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 41ec360515f6..af423f5d7ad8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ struct stack_info {
* @kr_cur: When KRETPROBES is selected, holds the kretprobe instance
* associated with the most recently encountered replacement lr
* value.
+ *
+ * @task: Pointer to the task structure.
*/
struct unwind_state {
unsigned long fp;
@@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ struct unwind_state {
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
struct llist_node *kr_cur;
#endif
+ struct task_struct *task;
};
extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index b2b568e5deba..1b32e55735aa 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -33,8 +33,10 @@
*/
-static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state)
+static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
+ struct task_struct *task)
{
+ state->task = task;
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
state->kr_cur = NULL;
#endif
@@ -57,9 +59,10 @@ static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state)
* TODO: document requirements here.
*/
static inline void unwind_init_from_regs(struct unwind_state *state,
+ struct task_struct *task,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- unwind_init_common(state);
+ unwind_init_common(state, task);
state->fp = regs->regs[29];
state->pc = regs->pc;
@@ -71,9 +74,10 @@ static inline void unwind_init_from_regs(struct unwind_state *state,
* Note: this is always inlined, and we expect our caller to be a noinline
* function, such that this starts from our caller's caller.
*/
-static __always_inline void unwind_init_from_current(struct unwind_state *state)
+static __always_inline void unwind_init_from_current(struct unwind_state *state,
+ struct task_struct *task)
{
- unwind_init_common(state);
+ unwind_init_common(state, task);
state->fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(1);
state->pc = (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0);
@@ -87,7 +91,7 @@ static __always_inline void unwind_init_from_current(struct unwind_state *state)
static inline void unwind_init_from_task(struct unwind_state *state,
struct task_struct *task)
{
- unwind_init_common(state);
+ unwind_init_common(state, task);
state->fp = thread_saved_fp(task);
state->pc = thread_saved_pc(task);
@@ -100,11 +104,11 @@ static inline void unwind_init_from_task(struct unwind_state *state,
* records (e.g. a cycle), determined based on the location and fp value of A
* and the location (but not the fp value) of B.
*/
-static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
- struct unwind_state *state)
+static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
{
unsigned long fp = state->fp;
struct stack_info info;
+ struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
/* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
@@ -176,8 +180,7 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct task_struct *tsk,
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
-static void notrace unwind(struct task_struct *tsk,
- struct unwind_state *state,
+static void notrace unwind(struct unwind_state *state,
bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *data)
{
while (1) {
@@ -185,7 +188,7 @@ static void notrace unwind(struct task_struct *tsk,
if (!fn(data, state->pc))
break;
- ret = unwind_next(tsk, state);
+ ret = unwind_next(state);
if (ret < 0)
break;
}
@@ -232,11 +235,11 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
struct unwind_state state;
if (regs)
- unwind_init_from_regs(&state, regs);
+ unwind_init_from_regs(&state, task, regs);
else if (task == current)
- unwind_init_from_current(&state);
+ unwind_init_from_current(&state, task);
else
unwind_init_from_task(&state, task);
- unwind(task, &state, consume_entry, cookie);
+ unwind(&state, consume_entry, cookie);
}
--
2.25.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-17 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <95691cae4f4504f33d0fc9075541b1e7deefe96f>
2022-01-17 14:55 ` [PATCH v13 00/11] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks madvenka
2022-01-17 14:55 ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:55 ` [PATCH v13 01/11] arm64: Remove NULL task check from unwind_frame() madvenka
2022-01-17 14:55 ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:55 ` [PATCH v13 02/11] arm64: Rename unwinder functions madvenka
2022-01-17 14:55 ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` [PATCH v13 03/11] arm64: Rename stackframe to unwind_state madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` [PATCH v13 04/11] arm64: Split unwind_init() madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` madvenka
2022-02-02 18:44 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-02 18:44 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03 0:26 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03 0:26 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03 0:39 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03 0:39 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03 11:29 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03 11:29 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-15 13:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 13:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 18:04 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-15 18:04 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-17 14:56 ` madvenka [this message]
2022-01-17 14:56 ` [PATCH v13 05/11] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state madvenka
2022-02-02 18:45 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-02 18:45 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-15 13:22 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 13:22 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-22 16:53 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-22 16:53 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-17 14:56 ` [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind() madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` madvenka
2022-02-02 18:46 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-02 18:46 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03 0:34 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03 0:34 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03 11:30 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03 11:30 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03 14:45 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03 14:45 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-15 13:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 13:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 18:12 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-15 18:12 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-07 16:51 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-07 16:51 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-07 17:01 ` Mark Brown
2022-03-07 17:01 ` Mark Brown
2022-03-08 22:00 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-08 22:00 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-09 11:47 ` Mark Brown
2022-03-09 11:47 ` Mark Brown
2022-03-09 15:34 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-09 15:34 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-10 8:33 ` Miroslav Benes
2022-03-10 8:33 ` Miroslav Benes
2022-03-10 12:36 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-10 12:36 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-16 3:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-03-16 3:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-08 14:44 ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-08 14:44 ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-08 17:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-08 17:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-10 17:42 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:42 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:33 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:33 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:45 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:45 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-17 14:56 ` [PATCH v13 07/11] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` [PATCH v13 08/11] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` [PATCH v13 09/11] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` [PATCH v13 10/11] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` [PATCH v13 11/11] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56 ` madvenka
2022-01-25 5:21 ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-25 5:21 ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-25 13:43 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-25 13:43 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-26 10:20 ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-26 10:20 ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-26 17:14 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-26 17:14 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-27 1:13 ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-27 1:13 ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-26 17:16 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-26 17:16 ` Mark Brown
2022-04-07 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/9] objtool: Parse DWARF Call Frame Information in object files madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/9] objtool: Generate DWARF rules and place them in a special section madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/9] dwarf: Build the kernel with DWARF information madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/9] dwarf: Implement DWARF rule processing in the kernel madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/9] dwarf: Implement DWARF support for modules madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 6/9] arm64: unwinder: Add a reliability check in the unwinder based on DWARF CFI madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 7/9] arm64: dwarf: Implement unwind hints madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 8/9] dwarf: Miscellaneous changes required for enabling livepatch madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 9/9] dwarf: Enable livepatch for ARM64 madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25 ` madvenka
2022-04-08 0:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-08 0:21 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-08 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-11 17:26 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-11 17:26 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-11 17:18 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-11 17:18 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-12 8:32 ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-12 8:32 ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-16 0:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-16 0:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-18 12:28 ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-18 12:28 ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-18 16:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-18 16:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-18 18:38 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-18 18:38 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
[not found] ` <844b3ede-eddb-cbe6-80e0-3529e2da2eb6@huawei.com>
2022-04-12 17:27 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-12 17:27 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-16 1:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-16 1:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-14 14:11 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-14 14:11 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-08 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 14:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-08 14:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-10 17:47 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:47 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-11 16:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-11 16:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-08 12:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 12:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-11 17:35 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-11 17:35 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220117145608.6781-6-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
--cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.