All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
	sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v13 07/11] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:56:04 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117145608.6781-8-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220117145608.6781-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

Change the loop in unwind()
===========================

Change the unwind loop in unwind() to:

	while (unwind_continue(state, consume_entry, cookie))
		unwind_next(state);

This is easy to understand and maintain.

New function unwind_continue()
==============================

Define a new function unwind_continue() that is used in the unwind loop
to check for conditions that terminate a stack trace.

The conditions checked are:

	- If the bottom of the stack (final frame) has been reached,
	  terminate.

	- If the consume_entry() function returns false, the caller of
	  unwind has asked to terminate the stack trace. So, terminate.

	- If unwind_next() failed for some reason (like stack corruption),
	  terminate.

Do not return an error value from unwind_next()
===============================================

We want to check for terminating conditions only in unwind_continue() from
the unwinder loop. So, do not return an error value from unwind_next().
Simply set a flag in unwind_state and check the flag in unwind_continue().

Final FP
========

Introduce a new field "final_fp" in "struct unwind_state". Initialize this
to the final frame of the stack trace:

	task_pt_regs(task)->stackframe

This is where the stacktrace must terminate if it is successful. Add an
explicit comment to that effect.

Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h |  6 +++
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c      | 72 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index af423f5d7ad8..c11b048ffd0e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ struct stack_info {
  *               value.
  *
  * @task:        Pointer to the task structure.
+ *
+ * @final_fp	 Pointer to the final frame.
+ *
+ * @failed:      Unwind failed.
  */
 struct unwind_state {
 	unsigned long fp;
@@ -64,6 +68,8 @@ struct unwind_state {
 	struct llist_node *kr_cur;
 #endif
 	struct task_struct *task;
+	unsigned long final_fp;
+	bool failed;
 };
 
 extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index f772dac78b11..73fc6b5ee6fd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
 	bitmap_zero(state->stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES);
 	state->prev_fp = 0;
 	state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
+	state->failed = false;
+
+	/* Stack trace terminates here. */
+	state->final_fp = (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(task)->stackframe;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -97,6 +101,25 @@ static inline void unwind_init_from_task(struct unwind_state *state,
 	state->pc = thread_saved_pc(task);
 }
 
+static bool notrace unwind_continue(struct unwind_state *state,
+				    stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
+				    void *cookie)
+{
+	if (state->failed) {
+		/* PC is suspect. Cannot consume it. */
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	if (!consume_entry(cookie, state->pc)) {
+		/* Caller terminated the unwind. */
+		state->failed = true;
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return state->fp != state->final_fp;
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_continue);
+
 /*
  * Unwind from one frame record (A) to the next frame record (B).
  *
@@ -104,24 +127,26 @@ static inline void unwind_init_from_task(struct unwind_state *state,
  * records (e.g. a cycle), determined based on the location and fp value of A
  * and the location (but not the fp value) of B.
  */
-static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
+static void notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 {
 	unsigned long fp = state->fp;
 	struct stack_info info;
 	struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
 
-	/* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
-	if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
-		return -ENOENT;
-
-	if (fp & 0x7)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (fp & 0x7) {
+		state->failed = true;
+		return;
+	}
 
-	if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, &info))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, &info)) {
+		state->failed = true;
+		return;
+	}
 
-	if (test_bit(info.type, state->stacks_done))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (test_bit(info.type, state->stacks_done)) {
+		state->failed = true;
+		return;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * As stacks grow downward, any valid record on the same stack must be
@@ -137,8 +162,10 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 	 * stack.
 	 */
 	if (info.type == state->prev_type) {
-		if (fp <= state->prev_fp)
-			return -EINVAL;
+		if (fp <= state->prev_fp) {
+			state->failed = true;
+			return;
+		}
 	} else {
 		set_bit(state->prev_type, state->stacks_done);
 	}
@@ -166,8 +193,10 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 		 */
 		orig_pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(tsk, NULL, state->pc,
 						(void *)state->fp);
-		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(state->pc == orig_pc))
-			return -EINVAL;
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(state->pc == orig_pc)) {
+			state->failed = true;
+			return;
+		}
 		state->pc = orig_pc;
 	}
 #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
@@ -175,23 +204,14 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 	if (is_kretprobe_trampoline(state->pc))
 		state->pc = kretprobe_find_ret_addr(tsk, (void *)state->fp, &state->kr_cur);
 #endif
-
-	return 0;
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
 
 static void notrace unwind(struct unwind_state *state,
 			   stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie)
 {
-	while (1) {
-		int ret;
-
-		if (!consume_entry(cookie, state->pc))
-			break;
-		ret = unwind_next(state);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			break;
-	}
+	while (unwind_continue(state, consume_entry, cookie))
+		unwind_next(state);
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind);
 
-- 
2.25.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
To: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com,
	sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	madvenka@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: [PATCH v13 07/11] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:56:04 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220117145608.6781-8-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220117145608.6781-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>

Change the loop in unwind()
===========================

Change the unwind loop in unwind() to:

	while (unwind_continue(state, consume_entry, cookie))
		unwind_next(state);

This is easy to understand and maintain.

New function unwind_continue()
==============================

Define a new function unwind_continue() that is used in the unwind loop
to check for conditions that terminate a stack trace.

The conditions checked are:

	- If the bottom of the stack (final frame) has been reached,
	  terminate.

	- If the consume_entry() function returns false, the caller of
	  unwind has asked to terminate the stack trace. So, terminate.

	- If unwind_next() failed for some reason (like stack corruption),
	  terminate.

Do not return an error value from unwind_next()
===============================================

We want to check for terminating conditions only in unwind_continue() from
the unwinder loop. So, do not return an error value from unwind_next().
Simply set a flag in unwind_state and check the flag in unwind_continue().

Final FP
========

Introduce a new field "final_fp" in "struct unwind_state". Initialize this
to the final frame of the stack trace:

	task_pt_regs(task)->stackframe

This is where the stacktrace must terminate if it is successful. Add an
explicit comment to that effect.

Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h |  6 +++
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c      | 72 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index af423f5d7ad8..c11b048ffd0e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ struct stack_info {
  *               value.
  *
  * @task:        Pointer to the task structure.
+ *
+ * @final_fp	 Pointer to the final frame.
+ *
+ * @failed:      Unwind failed.
  */
 struct unwind_state {
 	unsigned long fp;
@@ -64,6 +68,8 @@ struct unwind_state {
 	struct llist_node *kr_cur;
 #endif
 	struct task_struct *task;
+	unsigned long final_fp;
+	bool failed;
 };
 
 extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index f772dac78b11..73fc6b5ee6fd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ static void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
 	bitmap_zero(state->stacks_done, __NR_STACK_TYPES);
 	state->prev_fp = 0;
 	state->prev_type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
+	state->failed = false;
+
+	/* Stack trace terminates here. */
+	state->final_fp = (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(task)->stackframe;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -97,6 +101,25 @@ static inline void unwind_init_from_task(struct unwind_state *state,
 	state->pc = thread_saved_pc(task);
 }
 
+static bool notrace unwind_continue(struct unwind_state *state,
+				    stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
+				    void *cookie)
+{
+	if (state->failed) {
+		/* PC is suspect. Cannot consume it. */
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	if (!consume_entry(cookie, state->pc)) {
+		/* Caller terminated the unwind. */
+		state->failed = true;
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return state->fp != state->final_fp;
+}
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_continue);
+
 /*
  * Unwind from one frame record (A) to the next frame record (B).
  *
@@ -104,24 +127,26 @@ static inline void unwind_init_from_task(struct unwind_state *state,
  * records (e.g. a cycle), determined based on the location and fp value of A
  * and the location (but not the fp value) of B.
  */
-static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
+static void notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 {
 	unsigned long fp = state->fp;
 	struct stack_info info;
 	struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
 
-	/* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
-	if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
-		return -ENOENT;
-
-	if (fp & 0x7)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (fp & 0x7) {
+		state->failed = true;
+		return;
+	}
 
-	if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, &info))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp, 16, &info)) {
+		state->failed = true;
+		return;
+	}
 
-	if (test_bit(info.type, state->stacks_done))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (test_bit(info.type, state->stacks_done)) {
+		state->failed = true;
+		return;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * As stacks grow downward, any valid record on the same stack must be
@@ -137,8 +162,10 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 	 * stack.
 	 */
 	if (info.type == state->prev_type) {
-		if (fp <= state->prev_fp)
-			return -EINVAL;
+		if (fp <= state->prev_fp) {
+			state->failed = true;
+			return;
+		}
 	} else {
 		set_bit(state->prev_type, state->stacks_done);
 	}
@@ -166,8 +193,10 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 		 */
 		orig_pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(tsk, NULL, state->pc,
 						(void *)state->fp);
-		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(state->pc == orig_pc))
-			return -EINVAL;
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(state->pc == orig_pc)) {
+			state->failed = true;
+			return;
+		}
 		state->pc = orig_pc;
 	}
 #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER */
@@ -175,23 +204,14 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
 	if (is_kretprobe_trampoline(state->pc))
 		state->pc = kretprobe_find_ret_addr(tsk, (void *)state->fp, &state->kr_cur);
 #endif
-
-	return 0;
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
 
 static void notrace unwind(struct unwind_state *state,
 			   stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie)
 {
-	while (1) {
-		int ret;
-
-		if (!consume_entry(cookie, state->pc))
-			break;
-		ret = unwind_next(state);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			break;
-	}
+	while (unwind_continue(state, consume_entry, cookie))
+		unwind_next(state);
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind);
 
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-17 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <95691cae4f4504f33d0fc9075541b1e7deefe96f>
2022-01-17 14:55 ` [PATCH v13 00/11] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks madvenka
2022-01-17 14:55   ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:55   ` [PATCH v13 01/11] arm64: Remove NULL task check from unwind_frame() madvenka
2022-01-17 14:55     ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:55   ` [PATCH v13 02/11] arm64: Rename unwinder functions madvenka
2022-01-17 14:55     ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 03/11] arm64: Rename stackframe to unwind_state madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56     ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 04/11] arm64: Split unwind_init() madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56     ` madvenka
2022-02-02 18:44     ` Mark Brown
2022-02-02 18:44       ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03  0:26       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03  0:26         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03  0:39         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03  0:39           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03 11:29           ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03 11:29             ` Mark Brown
2022-02-15 13:07     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 13:07       ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 18:04       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-15 18:04         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 05/11] arm64: Copy the task argument to unwind_state madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56     ` madvenka
2022-02-02 18:45     ` Mark Brown
2022-02-02 18:45       ` Mark Brown
2022-02-15 13:22     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 13:22       ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-22 16:53       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-22 16:53         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind() madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56     ` madvenka
2022-02-02 18:46     ` Mark Brown
2022-02-02 18:46       ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03  0:34       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03  0:34         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03 11:30         ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03 11:30           ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03 14:45           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-03 14:45             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-15 13:39     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 13:39       ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 18:12       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-02-15 18:12         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-07 16:51       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-07 16:51         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-07 17:01         ` Mark Brown
2022-03-07 17:01           ` Mark Brown
2022-03-08 22:00           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-08 22:00             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-09 11:47             ` Mark Brown
2022-03-09 11:47               ` Mark Brown
2022-03-09 15:34               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-09 15:34                 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-10  8:33               ` Miroslav Benes
2022-03-10  8:33                 ` Miroslav Benes
2022-03-10 12:36                 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-10 12:36                   ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-03-16  3:43               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-03-16  3:43                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-08 14:44         ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-08 14:44           ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-08 17:58           ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-08 17:58             ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-10 17:42             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:42               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:33           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:33             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:45           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:45             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-17 14:56   ` madvenka [this message]
2022-01-17 14:56     ` [PATCH v13 07/11] arm64: Make the unwind loop in unwind() similar to other architectures madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 08/11] arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56     ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 09/11] arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56     ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 10/11] arm64: Introduce arch_stack_walk_reliable() madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56     ` madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56   ` [PATCH v13 11/11] arm64: Select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE madvenka
2022-01-17 14:56     ` madvenka
2022-01-25  5:21     ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-25  5:21       ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-25 13:43       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-25 13:43         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-26 10:20         ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-26 10:20           ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-26 17:14           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-26 17:14             ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-01-27  1:13             ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-27  1:13               ` nobuta.keiya
2022-01-26 17:16       ` Mark Brown
2022-01-26 17:16         ` Mark Brown
2022-04-07 20:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/9] objtool: Parse DWARF Call Frame Information in object files madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25     ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/9] objtool: Generate DWARF rules and place them in a special section madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25     ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/9] dwarf: Build the kernel with DWARF information madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25     ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/9] dwarf: Implement DWARF rule processing in the kernel madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25     ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/9] dwarf: Implement DWARF support for modules madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25     ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 6/9] arm64: unwinder: Add a reliability check in the unwinder based on DWARF CFI madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25     ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 7/9] arm64: dwarf: Implement unwind hints madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25     ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 8/9] dwarf: Miscellaneous changes required for enabling livepatch madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25     ` madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25   ` [RFC PATCH v1 9/9] dwarf: Enable livepatch for ARM64 madvenka
2022-04-07 20:25     ` madvenka
2022-04-08  0:21   ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/9] arm64: livepatch: Use DWARF Call Frame Information for frame pointer validation Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-08  0:21     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-08 11:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 11:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-11 17:26       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-11 17:26         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-11 17:18     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-11 17:18       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-12  8:32       ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-12  8:32         ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-16  0:56         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-16  0:56           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-18 12:28           ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-18 12:28             ` Chen Zhongjin
2022-04-18 16:11             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-18 16:11               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-18 18:38               ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-18 18:38                 ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
     [not found]       ` <844b3ede-eddb-cbe6-80e0-3529e2da2eb6@huawei.com>
2022-04-12 17:27         ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-12 17:27           ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-16  1:07       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-16  1:07         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-14 14:11     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-14 14:11       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-08 10:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 10:55     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 11:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 11:54       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 14:34       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-08 14:34         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-10 17:47     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-10 17:47       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-11 16:34       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-11 16:34         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-04-08 12:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-08 12:06     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-11 17:35     ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman
2022-04-11 17:35       ` Madhavan T. Venkataraman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220117145608.6781-8-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=sjitindarsingh@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.