All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
To: <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>,
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	<bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <kbuild-all@lists.01.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: mediatek: fix side effect of mt8195 sram power on
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220313000110.3869-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202203120056.qtDEVoye-lkp@intel.com>

Hi Tinghan,

>      418 |                           MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS);
>          |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                           MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS
>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:418:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c: In function 'mt8195_scp_stop':
>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:592:28: error: 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS'?
>      592 |                            MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS);
>          |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                            MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS

I tested this patch and it can should be caught by the
internal build test.

Could you do the test before submitting patches out?


Thanks,
Miles

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
To: <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>,
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	<bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <kbuild-all@lists.01.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: mediatek: fix side effect of mt8195 sram power on
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220313000110.3869-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202203120056.qtDEVoye-lkp@intel.com>

Hi Tinghan,

>      418 |                           MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS);
>          |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                           MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS
>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:418:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c: In function 'mt8195_scp_stop':
>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:592:28: error: 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS'?
>      592 |                            MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS);
>          |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                            MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS

I tested this patch and it can should be caught by the
internal build test.

Could you do the test before submitting patches out?


Thanks,
Miles

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
To: <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>,
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	<bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <kbuild-all@lists.01.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: mediatek: fix side effect of mt8195 sram power on
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220313000110.3869-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202203120056.qtDEVoye-lkp@intel.com>

Hi Tinghan,

>      418 |                           MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS);
>          |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                           MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS
>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:418:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c: In function 'mt8195_scp_stop':
>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:592:28: error: 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS'?
>      592 |                            MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS);
>          |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                            MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS

I tested this patch and it can should be caught by the
internal build test.

Could you do the test before submitting patches out?


Thanks,
Miles

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: mediatek: fix side effect of mt8195 sram power on
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 08:01:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220313000110.3869-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202203120056.qtDEVoye-lkp@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1022 bytes --]

Hi Tinghan,

>      418 |                           MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS);
>          |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                           MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS
>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:418:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c: In function 'mt8195_scp_stop':
>    drivers/remoteproc/mtk_scp.c:592:28: error: 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS'?
>      592 |                            MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_BITS);
>          |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |                            MT8195_L1TCM_SRAM_PDN_RESERVED_RSI_BITS

I tested this patch and it can should be caught by the
internal build test.

Could you do the test before submitting patches out?


Thanks,
Miles

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-13  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-11 12:30 [PATCH v2] remoteproc: mediatek: fix side effect of mt8195 sram power on Tinghan Shen
2022-03-11 12:30 ` Tinghan Shen
2022-03-11 12:30 ` Tinghan Shen
2022-03-11 13:05 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-03-11 13:05   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-03-11 13:05   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-03-14 11:15   ` Tinghan Shen
2022-03-14 11:15     ` Tinghan Shen
2022-03-14 11:15     ` Tinghan Shen
2022-03-11 16:57 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-11 16:57   ` kernel test robot
2022-03-11 16:57   ` kernel test robot
2022-03-13  0:01   ` Miles Chen [this message]
2022-03-13  0:01     ` Miles Chen
2022-03-13  0:01     ` Miles Chen
2022-03-13  0:01     ` Miles Chen
2022-03-14 11:12     ` Tinghan Shen
2022-03-14 11:12       ` Tinghan Shen
2022-03-14 11:12       ` Tinghan Shen
2022-03-14 11:12       ` Tinghan Shen
2022-03-11 23:56 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-11 23:56   ` kernel test robot
2022-03-11 23:56   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220313000110.3869-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com \
    --to=miles.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=tinghan.shen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.